Very high-AR sail

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 02 Nov 2017 07:16
    Reply # 5497609 on 5491319
    Annie Hill wrote:
    Jami Jokinen wrote:Actually I was hoping to be able to use batten length of 3000mm (because the al-tubes in Finland are sold as 6000mm). That would make some 2.2 or more, I suppose (SA of 24-25 sqm). This might be too optimistic, though. 

    I don't suppose bamboo grows very well in Finland?
    No, according to my knowledge as a biologist. But then again, one could always start cultivating it... :D
  • 01 Nov 2017 20:25
    Reply # 5491319 on 5490380
    Jami Jokinen wrote:Actually I was hoping to be able to use batten length of 3000mm (because the al-tubes in Finland are sold as 6000mm). That would make some 2.2 or more, I suppose (SA of 24-25 sqm). This might be too optimistic, though. 

    I don't suppose bamboo grows very well in Finland?
  • 01 Nov 2017 19:59
    Reply # 5491037 on 5271357

    The problem with a high AR sail is that the upper parts of the sheet are pulling very strongly downwards, in the athwartships plane as well as the fore and aft plane, if you don't do something to improve the angle between sail and sheet. This pull has to be matched by an equally strong pull on the LHP, if the sail is not to set with distortion and creases.

    This question of what is a satisfactory sheeting arrangement is very subjective. If you get three different sailors to try an anti-twist single sheet on a high AR sail, with the deck blocks on the centreline, you might get three different answers:

    "It's fine, I'm happy with it"
    "It's not perfect, but I can live with it"
    "It's not good enough, I should try to find something better".

    If you're really going for AR = 2.2, then I think you should start with an upper and a lower sheet, with the deck blocks central, and see what you think. Sheeting from the weather side always adds complication, and only you can decide whether that complication is justified by lower loads on the LHP and an easier sail to set.

  • 01 Nov 2017 19:12
    Reply # 5490380 on 5485060
    Actually I was hoping to be able to use batten length of 3000mm (because the al-tubes in Finland are sold as 6000mm). That would make some 2.2 or more, I suppose (SA of 24-25 sqm). This might be too optimistic, though. 
  • 01 Nov 2017 12:30
    Reply # 5485060 on 5271357
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Jami,

    if it is the AR=2.10 rig in your album, that you are thinking of, then I think the Johanna-sheeting should be ok. You may not be able to sheet the furled bundle to the centre line, but you should be able to sheet a deeply-reefed sail for full close-hauled sailing.

    Plan B, if the space is on the short side, is to have a separate upper lower sheet. Better that than a sheet track, in my opinion.

    Arne

  • 01 Nov 2017 08:36
    Reply # 5482924 on 5276697
    David Tyler wrote:

    In the athwartships plane, I would just say that the top  of a high sail really needs to sheeted to weather (however you do it), or you won't get full value in terms of windward ability from that height, and I would have to question the wisdom of making it so high.

    You don't think Arne's "Johanna-type sheeting" is enough to control the upper part as such?


  • 26 Sep 2017 05:37
    Reply # 5279469 on 5271357

    The Stellrechts' 'Flutterby' is in the upper reaches of aspect ratio and SA to Diplacement. While they were considering their sails' geometry, I remember, they looked forward to light-air goodness and reefing routinely for stronger breezes. I believe they're pleased... worth talking to them probably.

    Cheers, Kurt

  • 25 Sep 2017 21:52
    Reply # 5278944 on 5276697
    David Tyler wrote:
    Richard Brooksby wrote:

    Roughly what angle of sheet is too steep, in your experience(s)?

    It's difficult to put a numerical value on this as it depends on one's tolerance of sheet hangups. My tolerance may be different from yours, and may indeed vary from day to day.
    10° + S/4 - 4C/2 where S = hours of sleep, C = cups of coffee. I'm aware this can go negative if I drink too much coffee.
    Last modified: 25 Sep 2017 21:53 | Anonymous member
  • 24 Sep 2017 13:41
    Reply # 5276697 on 5275829
    Richard Brooksby wrote:

    Roughly what angle of sheet is too steep, in your experience(s)?

    It's difficult to put a numerical value on this as it depends on one's tolerance of sheet hangups. My tolerance may be different from yours, and may indeed vary from day to day.

    In the fore and aft plane, we can say that a minimum of 10 degrees between leech and upper shet is a reasonable figure, and of course, if the top sheeted batten is extended, this helps enormously.

    In the athwartships plane, I would just say that the top  of a high sail really needs to sheeted to weather (however you do it), or you won't get full value in terms of windward ability from that height, and I would have to question the wisdom of making it so high.

  • 24 Sep 2017 04:31
    Reply # 5276517 on 5271357

    Richard,

    A little data to relate to your question, and David's answer:

    mehitabel's foresail has AR 2.2 and in profile, sail centred, the sheet is 12 degrees forward of vertical, to the top batten. I'd move the sheet base aft if the mainmast weren't there, but it works very well as is, and I'm glad not to have double sheets.

    For a Hasler-McLeod Coromandel's sheet I measure ~16 degrees to the top sheeted batten, and you know that rig.

    Kurt

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software