Some thoughts on Fantail's next sail...

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 
  • 11 Oct 2016 23:18
    Reply # 4301133 on 4298851
    Anonymous
    Arne Kverneland wrote:

    Could I suggest you open a new topic  -  something like "A new rig for Annie"? Both the Fantail  and the Annie project is big enough to deserve their own thread.

    Arne

    Hi Arne

    Moved to 'A new rig for Annie' as requested, kind regards

    Andrew

  • 10 Oct 2016 15:10
    Reply # 4298851 on 4278178
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Could I suggest you open a new topic  -  something like "A new rig for Annie"? Both the Fantail  and the Annie project is big enough to deserve their own thread.

    Arne

  • 10 Oct 2016 12:29
    Reply # 4298643 on 4278178

    Bryan, that is very instructive information, and most eloquently put!! And yes, we do put aesthetics quite high on the list. I agree with you totally about the look that Footprints has. She is a terrific looking boat and I think Annie would suit the sail plan as she does. As do Fantail, Weaverbird and quite a few others. It's a subtle thing, but an important one.

    Because the sling point is where it is, presumably this is what allows you to sweep the sail across the mast when off the wind and I wonder if, with other sail plans that have the sling point closer to the throat, this is more strenuous on the rig or maybe just inadvisable? With potentially 56sqm of sail we'd need to be careful about that.

    ...... I've been interrupted and may have forgotten something that I wanted to write. meantime, thanks a lot!

    Cheers, Pol.

  • 10 Oct 2016 06:16
    Reply # 4298409 on 4298165
    Deleted user
    Bryan Tuffnell wrote:

    I was lucky enough to get a few hours' sailing on Footprints, who is much more of a sailor's boat - she's the excitable puppy with the full bladder straining her leash. Footprints seemed much more responsive to sail set, and when bearing away, David would use a running tack parrel to draw the sail across the mast in order to relieve tiller pressure. Footprints' hull is very different to Fantail's.

    To my eyes, Footprints' sail puts her in the running for the most attractive boat I have seen. Her Fantail sail just looks right to me, and seems to compliment the plumb bow. Your boat is gorgeous, and perhaps aesthetics may play a role in your choice of rig?

    Aw shucks, such compliments - it's enough to make a girl like Footprints blush!!

    The choice of sail is really thanks to David Tyler and his design, and the choice of sail cloth colour, but yes, it all does go together very well. As to performance I think that is a result of a reasonably generous sail area, minimising weight as much as I can, Gary Underwood's great design, and probably my 50 plus years of sailing experience and growing years of experience with the rig and knowing how far I can push things.


    Last modified: 10 Oct 2016 07:05 | Deleted user
  • 10 Oct 2016 01:06
    Reply # 4298165 on 4297677
    Deleted user
    POL BERGIUS wrote:

    If mast position does become an issue with the fan-shaped sail, am I right in thinking that an "Arne type" planform would give me more latitude in mast positioning?

    Pol, others will be far more qualified than I am to answer this, but it was instructive for me to compare Fantail with Footprints, given that they have the same sail.

    Fantail has a broad groove; she is the family pet settled comfortably by the fire with her eyes shut, not caring that the kids are pulling her ears... her helm stays cheerfully balanced on all points and can be left alone for perhaps a minute at time, she is totally insensitive to trim and would, I'm sure, tolerate a reasonable misplacement of the mast without grumbling. Any time Fantail loses that easy-going, I'm-in-my-happy-place feeling, it's time to reef.

    I was lucky enough to get a few hours' sailing on Footprints, who is much more of a sailor's boat - she's the excitable puppy with the full bladder straining her leash. Footprints seemed much more responsive to sail set, and when bearing away, David would use a running tack parrel to draw the sail across the mast in order to relieve tiller pressure. Footprints' hull is very different to Fantail's, and would be much more sensitive to mast placement.

    To my eyes, Footprints' sail puts her in the running for the most attractive boat I have seen. Her Fantail sail just looks right to me, and seems to compliment the plumb bow. Your boat is gorgeous, and perhaps aesthetics may play a role in your choice of rig?

    Last modified: 10 Oct 2016 06:44 | Deleted user
  • 09 Oct 2016 12:42
    Reply # 4297695 on 4278178

    I think that, at 600sq', Annie is quite sensibly and conservatively rigged compared with her working ancestors which would have "enjoyed" much more skilled crews than I who were used to working their engineless boats as extensions of themselves. Given a junk rig, I wonder how much canvas they'd have hoisted?!

  • 09 Oct 2016 12:35
    Reply # 4297677 on 4278178
    Hi David and Bryan, Thanks for your comments. I am a fan of Tystie, Fantail and Footprints! Oh and Lakatao!

    David I havent received the drawing by email yet, even in my spam locker. But I recall your comment that the fantail form would suit a boat up to 28', and our Annie is 29'6" and possibly at 6 (or maybe 6.5) tons a bit heavier than you might have envisaged when you made that statement? But now you mention the Weaverbird's taller rig... I'm interested in  a higher A/R sail as I can see that should make it easier to handle. I also like any improvements to windward if they don't come at too high a cost in other directions. And the mast positioning is a little tricky with Annie with some bits possibly in the way, so I require the CE to be quite well forward. A higher A/R rig is consistent with that need - great. But, the mast will be timber, as timber masts are part of my business. Should I be a bit worried about a 12 or 13m lap?!

    You are both dead right about being careful with fitting a rig that suits another boat so ideally. David if you don't think I'm pushing the LAP too much would you be able to copy me your expanded Weaverbird rig please? I'd very much like to see where that will put the mast position.

    If mast position does become an issue with the fan-shaped sail, am I right in thinking that an "Arne type" planform would give me more latitude in mast positioning? Which sail is easier to make may well come into the equation too.

    Thanks again, Pol.


  • 09 Oct 2016 09:18
    Reply # 4297625 on 4297389
    Bryan Tuffnell wrote:Pol, it might be worth noting that among the many compromises in the new design, the sail has been drawn to use Fantail's existing mast, battens and yard. With the freedom of a blank slate other choices could have been made, that ultimately suit your boat better.
    I echo that. Fantail's sail was a response to a particular set of requirements, including the mast placement, aft of the sleeping cabin and therefore forward raked.

    I now prefer a higher AR. If I scale Weaverbird's sail up to 56 sq m, I get a LAP of 13.5m, a batten length of 5.4m and a yard length of 4m; that will make for a much more manageable sail, which becomes an important factor to consider in larger sizes of sail. Thinking in practical terms, it's worth keeping in mind that the GRP tube that I prefer is available in 6m lengths. That would lead me towards designing a sail for you that had 6m battens, based on Weaverbird's sail.

  • 08 Oct 2016 22:42
    Reply # 4297389 on 4278178
    Deleted user
    Pol, it might be worth noting that among the many compromises in the new design, the sail has been drawn to use Fantail's existing mast, battens and yard. With the freedom of a blank slate other choices could have been made, that ultimately suit your boat better.
  • 08 Oct 2016 21:53
    Reply # 4297375 on 4297368
    POL BERGIUS wrote:Thanks very much Chris. And thanks also, David. Annie's s/a with tops' l is just over 600 sqft or 56 sqm. I'm thinking either the fantail or Arne's modified HM will produce just as much or more drive upwind if given the required cambered panels. It would be great to get a scaled up version, thank you! Pol.
    Pol, I've emailed the drawing to you. It's just a little larger than the fantail sail I used on Tystie, so it's possible, but I wonder whether it's a good idea to go this big. Footprints has the other big fantail sail, at 53 sq m, and this might well be considered to be the sensible top limit of size for this design. 
<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software