Slieve McGalliard wrote:
... As planned, it should be easier for Edward to use as the blade will swing out of the water and cause no drag nor manoeuvring problems while berthing which an auxiliary rudder might. It should be more than powerful enough, even with a fairly small vane.
Perhaps I'm using the exercise to ward off Alzheimer's, if it's not too late.
Cheers, Slieve.
Slieve,
I can't help feeling that both you and David Tyler are spending lots of energy on reinventing something that already works splendidly. Btw, the short tiller of that aux. rudder could easily be linked to the main tiller when the windvane is disconnected, and then one would have super harbour manoeuvreability, even in astern. The fact that one locks the main rudder with the vane in use, solves any course stability issues without needing to be clever. Windvane designs tend to be clever enough as they are.
Arne
PS: this reminds me a bit about aeroplane designers in the thirties who spent lots of ingenuity on designing flying wings. They made it, sort of, but getting the things stable , safe and CG-forgiving (before fly-by-wire) proved to be next to impossible, so the concept was dropped (until the B2-bomber).