David Tyler wrote:
Bryan, you're 180 degrees wrong about the geometry. This servo worked on Tystie, too well. It is one of the cornerstones of servo pendulum design that when the servo tiller is pulled out one way, the servo blade follows it out the same way, thus putting in the necessary negative feedback. So, if the servo tiller is facing forwards, it must be below the power axis.
Darn, that's twice now! David, I understand that the servo blade and its tiller must operate in the same sense to damp its response and limit it's actions.
Where I'm confused is when the boat yaws. Say the stern yaws to port. The servo would sense this, swinging to starboard and correctly turning the tiller to starboard if left to itself. However, because the rudder isn't fully balanced it senses the yaw, and turns the tiller and by extension swings the servo. But, because the vane is doing its job it has also sensed the yaw to to port and has tumbled to starboard, holding the servo tiller, so the angle of attack on the servo is now acting against the desired starboard swing of the servo, trying to turn it to port instead, positively coupling to the original yaw to port. If this happens, this action would compete with the correct function of the unit as a whole. In other words, does feedback from the rudder moving due to yaw, which Fantail's does, damp the servo's yaw response (out of existence, possibly)? Does this make sense? This is what I really want to be wrong about, because the solution to that would be to put the servo tiller above the pendulum axis (or reverse its direction), which would compete with the servo's need for damping.
I'll try both shifting the tiller attachment point and the bungee - thanks guys.
Here's that photo:
http://www.junkrigassociation.org/Sys/PublicProfile/30361922/Photo/
61733681/61733710/0?dh=0&cppr=0