In the 1964 OSTAR, Blondie Hasler & Jester finished in 37 days and 22 hours. In the book "Single Handed" in 1984, Libby Purves calls this a “startling aberration; seven or eight weeks is nearer the mark”. This struck me as an odd comment, given that the only other time registered by Hasler and Jester in this race, four years earlier, was also less than seven weeks (just).
Hasler improved on his 1960 time by 22%. Chichester improved his in Gypsy Moth III by 26%, and Lacombe, though in another (very similar) boat by 37%. These greater improvements were not flagged by Ms. Purves as aberrant. The chapter quoted deals principally with Jester in the hands of Mike Richey, who was noted for his indifference to ‘the race’, being content to spend time navigating across the ocean in a leisurely fashion, within the race structure (see Graham Cox's excellent HoF article).
So, what do we think? Is this a further example of a knee-jerk prejudice against the funny little junk-rigged vessels? Or simply the confusion of the subsequent uncompetitive nature of Mike Richey with that of Jester? Or am I just becoming paranoid?