This matter of the facemask’s usefulness (or lack of it) seems to have grown out of its original frame.
Since I am the one who was dumb enough to open this topic, I want to clarify a little.
As I wrote in my original write-up:
· Making one’s own facemask was to avoid that hospitals run short of masks (or because they already had taken over all of the professional ones).
· The main way of avoiding spreading the virus, is keeping a distance to others.
· I only recommend using the facemask for the short period of time when we need to do some shopping (once a week?). The mask will not be saturated by water in just 20 minutes.
· The mask is meant to protect others from the wearer, not the other way around. It has been found that many don’t get any symptoms, but can still infect others.
· When donning the mask at entering the shop , the mask is clean, with next to no virus or bacteria (right from the hot steam- iron)
Simple as that - I just want to reduce the likelihood of infecting others.
It has been argued that if one is sneezing or coughing, one should stay away, and if one is not sneezing, one doesn’t need the mask. I am not so sure about that. Anyone who has been out in really frosty weather, knows that our breath suddenly becomes visible: Moist condensates and freezes, so we can see it. It is this moist and droplets which I want to stop with my mask.
In addition to my first test to blow out a lighter’s flame, held in front of the mask (the flame hardly moved), I did another test yesterday:
Standing in front of a mirror, about 10-15cm away from it, I breathed (panted), and dew formed on the mirror, as expected. I then repeated the exercise with the mask on. The result was that no dew formed on the mirror.
I therefore conclude that wearing a clean and dry homemade facemask, worn for a short period of time, will be better in protecting the surrounding people, than not wearing that mask.
Arne