PBO Junk Rig article

  • 06 Jan 2015 22:32
    Reply # 3182473 on 3045049

    Dave Doran wrote, "As long as it doesn't carry more than the total sail area allowed to a Bermudan rigged boat, (ie, Mainsail, Genoa and Spinnaker), why not allow it to carry more sail than the upwind sail area allowed to a Bermudan rigged boat which has an additional sail to help it downwind?"

    Oh Dave, if only life was that simple, but it ain't. The racing handicapping systems are built around the Bermudan rig. They place such high penalties on quadrantal sails that no-one uses them. They do not acknowledge the existence of 'foreign' rigs like Lateen or junk rig, and we are very lucky that the Island Sailing Club who organise the Round the Island Race have developed a watered down handicap system that allows owners to measure their own boats and apply for a simplified handicap. These handicaps are not particularly accurate as some owner seem to have elastic tape measures and very questionable weighing systems, and I suppose the entrants accept this as it would become expensive/ impractical to tighten the system up. Even with this simplified system the junk rig isn't really covered. When I first approached the club they filed Poppy as 'too difficult' to handicap, but they eventually accepted that I wanted to be compared with the standard Bermudan rig with the same area of full main and about a No.2 roller Genoa as that was the area of my rig, and that is what they kindly gave me.

    I understand there are handicap systems that rate a Bermudan rig as slower overall when it carries a spinnaker and faster when raced without. There seems to be no sense in handicapping, and that there is no room in racing for the junk rig. If racing is your interest then you have to have a Bermudan rig. If you want a sensible rig then you have a good junk rig, and ignore the racing boys. All this still leaves us with the problem of comparing rig performance.

    On Poppy I have found no need to have more sail area than that based on full Bermudan main and No.2 roller Genoa. In 4 knots of wind I can sail at 2 knots in any direction, when the Bermudan boats are almost stationary in the water. What more do I need?

    Cheers, Slieve

  • 06 Jan 2015 15:38
    Reply # 3181963 on 3045049

    Hi,

    Apologies for not have spotted this Thread. It took some time before I got my handicap. The authorities in Norway had to consult the IOC about a single sail rig, (Uno rig) to get the handicap right. As the X-99 got a worse handicap With New rules, my Uno rig got a fairly good one: 0.911 for a fully crewed boat, and 0.902 when shorthanded. I have spent some time refining the sail and Learning to sail With good results. This year I have won 3 races, one 2nd Place, and at the advent seilasen,(the Wind not favorable), I got a 5th Place, beaten by a J-24, an Albin Express, another Express and a J-24 all sailed by Higly capable crews using spinnakers, even for short runs, when able to do so. All in all: I am quite pleased With the results gotten in 2014. The most pleasing was keeping up With a Humpfreys 30 With vater ballast tanks, loosing only 15 minutes in a 7 hours upwind sail. The skipper used to sail in the 6,5 class. The normal sail on an X-99 is 62m2. With Genoa 2, the areal is 52m2. My sail is 55m2. Boats not using spinnakers are eaten raw!

    Ketil  

    Last modified: 06 Jan 2015 15:41 | Anonymous member
  • 06 Jan 2015 13:24
    Reply # 3181883 on 3045049

    Most Club races have a cruiser class, which is 'white' sails only.  JR should be reasonably competitive hear, especially as the BM often do not have the latest high tech sails.  It is also the cruiser folk that are natural JR converts.  So get out and show 'em.

    cheers  Mark

  • 06 Jan 2015 12:40
    Reply # 3181870 on 3181792
    Deleted user
    David Doran wrote:The Junk Rig doesn't have specialised upwind and downwind sails, just a sail.
    There is nothing to prevent a junk-rig sailor from carrying an extra sail for sailing downwind and/or in light airs. The Chinese all along the coast did just that with all sorts of jibs, square tops'ls and fisherman-style sails.My boat China Girl carries a single junk sail of around 330 sq ft on a 24ft waterline and 5 ton displacement.

    She also carries a cruising chute of 700 sq ft which can be used to great effect in winds anywhere aft of the beam up to around F3. The head is hauled to the masthead on a spare halyard, the tack is attached to a retractable  square-section aluminium sprit, and the clew to a slim whisker pole whose heel steps on the mast. The sheet runs via a deck block and deck cleat to the cockpit.

    It is easily launched & handled and a delight to use in light airs. Admittedly it requires work on the foredeck to launch and furl, but in the light conditions in which it is used this is not too much of a drawback. At F3 and upwards one has to watch the loads at the masthead of an unstayed rig - the mast begins to bend alarmingly. With this proviso, it is a great supplement to the main sail, more than trebling the total sail area.


    Last modified: 06 Jan 2015 12:42 | Deleted user
  • 06 Jan 2015 09:34
    Reply # 3181815 on 3045049
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Dave,
    The point you highlight is the same which I put weight on: The ability to tune the camber of the Bermuda sails underway will give them a big advantage. In addition, most racing classes let you carry many sails on board and change to the one that fits the conditions best. In other words, these boats frequently carry (and pay for) more than twice the area that they actually set at one time. For this reason, the junkrig will rarely shine in a race fleet of Bm-rigged boats, in particular not if the race is over a triangular course. There you start at the lee mark and finish at the weather mark, which suits the Bm-rigs well. Remember also that the modern Bm-mainsails, with their big roach and almost square tops, are in a different performance league than those of the seventies and before. Therefore, one cannot expect that any of the present versions of JR will have better aerodynamics than modern Bm sails.

    I think most readers of that article in PBO will interpret David Harding’s message as the JR may be easily handled, but speed-wise it is still a sitting duck, compared to the Bm rig”. Worse: They will be right, as long as the junk-rigged boats race to the sail-area restricting rules.

    Therefore, I keep preaching this gospel: Forget about the racing rules that favour the Bm rig. Pile on enough sail area to let you run fast downwind, and give the sail moderate camber, say 6 to 10%, to go well to windward without being overpowered too easily. The result is that you frequently will be spotted, charging along at full speed. This will turn necks and make people and reconsider.

    Cheers, Arne

    (Now, back to work  -  only one more panel to cut out...)

     

  • 06 Jan 2015 08:41
    Reply # 3181794 on 3045049
    Apologies for the lack of formatting in the below post.>>> It was laid out better until it posted onto the website.
  • 06 Jan 2015 08:37
    Reply # 3181792 on 3045049
    Just a thought. Bermudan rigged boats generally allow a much larger downwind sail (the spinnaker, which could double or more, total sail area) in addition to the upwind sail area specified in the rules. So the total sail area allowed to sail around the entire race course is far larger than just its upwind sail area. The Junk Rig doesn't have specialised upwind and downwind sails, just a sail. Could it be argued that, as the only purpose of sailboat racing is to get around the entire race course as fast as possible using the suite of available sails, the junk rig boat is being unfairly penalised by not being allowed to carry enough of its own style of sail area to compete on the entire race course in its own manner? As long as it doesn't carry more than the total sail area allowed to a Bermudan rigged boat, (ie, Mainsail, Genoa and Spinnaker), why not allow it to carry more sail than the upwind sail area allowed to a Bermudan rigged boat which has an additional sail to help it downwind? I appreciate that the ISA rules are designed principally with Bermudan rigs in mind. Generally speaking, more upwind sail area is only useful in lighter winds anyway, as in many situations, the extra sail area of a Junk Rig simply becomes too powerful as the wind increases and would have to be reefed down. Might it be worth discussing the point with the Round the Island or other race committees? Purely with the interests of advancing the development of sailing? David.
    Last modified: 06 Jan 2015 08:50 | Anonymous member
  • 06 Jan 2015 07:05
    Reply # 3181779 on 3045049

    Apologies for joining in late, and thank you to Chris G. for directing me here from a more recent, related topic.

    I would be especially interested to hear thoughts on Mr. Harding's comment:

    Junks are unable to vary their draught or camber like a Bermudan rig, so in that respect they’re at a significant disadvantage. Greater control of twist, however, might make a big difference.

    This puts me in mind of Mr. Reddish's theory of the relationship among canted battens, twist and horizontal airflow, and their effect on draught (especially in fanned sails). Our own, flat-cut sails perform at their best with varying amounts of twist, particularly when the leech conforms to a smooth curve (no kinks).

    I do notice in the article photos that little twist has been induced.

    Dave Z
  • 18 Aug 2014 20:30
    Reply # 3077559 on 3045049
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    No problem, Edward ;-).

    What about having the extra cruising panel(s) on Amiina (not allowed when racing) made in a contrasting colour and just keep it/them furled away when racing?

    As for Marie G's data; Ketil can speak for himself. I haven't been much into the Marie G conversion  -  at least until recently: A while ago we had a sail together and afterwards I made a draft for a new 7-panel sail. This is a bit lower and broader, with an AR=2.00. The sail plan shows about how I think such a sail should be rigged these days: The slingpoint on the yard is moved about 5% aft of the middle of the yard, and the allowed angle of the halyard is up to 30 degrees from vertical. That decides the height of the mast.

    Arne

  • 18 Aug 2014 17:56
    Reply # 3077480 on 3076261
    Deleted user
    Arne Kverneland wrote:
    Edward Hooper wrote:
    Hei Arne,  Will your 26' Marieholme  IF have your normal oversized rig, or will you go with exactly the same sail area as your friend's race tuned Nordic Folkboat?  

    Likewise has Ketil kept the same sized rig as the other X boats, or gone 20% larger?


    Overseize rig?
    I cannot remember having fitted an oversize rig, only a couple of oversize masts. Sails can be reefed down, but masts cannot.

    In fact the LAP of Johanna’s mast is about exactly the same as that of Jester. The fact that Johanna can set 48.4m2versus Jesters 22, only shows that I made good use of Johanna’s short mast.

    Ingeborg, the IF, will have a 35.2m2 sail, set on a mast with a total length of 9.7m. That area is the same as mainsail plus Genoa 1 on the Bermuda rig. This gives a moderate SA/disp ratio of 21.1.

    I must be getting older...

    Cheers,
    Arne

    Apologies re 'oversized', I chose the word in haste and it was inappropriate.  May I say that I entirely agree with your philosophy that JR rigs can afford to carry 20/30%  more canvass, because of the ease and simplicity of reefing.  In general I am happy to keep with Van Der Stadts original design of 220 sq.ft., but the handicap penalty in something like the Round the Island race is prohibitive.

    You have not said how Ketil handles his handicap issues.  It would be helpful to know.

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software