If I may be allowed as Chairman to speak on behalf of all members, I feel sure that we are all grateful to the those who have tackled this business, apparently so competently.  Thank you Brian, Lesley and Malcolm who have driven this and to the others who have contributed ideas and proof read drafts. 

I have read the briefing note and the notice and, to me, who knows very little if anything about all this, it all reads very well. 

I would feel comfortable that this work demonstrates, at least to me, that we are taking all reasonable steps to demonstrate our duty of care to visitors to the site and hence our compliance with our legal requirements. 

I can offer no useful criticism or improvements.  (There is an extra full stop at the end of the section on Third Parties!) 

However, I would still urge others to do as Brian asks, ie actually read the briefing note and notice and offer any comments or further suggestions.  The use of many eyes and brains may help and will certainly be appreciated.  A significant number of members (and all committee members!) signing up to this work will help to demonstrate our intention to meet our legal requirements. 

A roll call of committee members:

Brian and Lesley were deeply involved in the drafting of the documents, so can be assumed to be in approval. 

Edward, Sally, David, Lynda, Annie and I have now commented on the documents and, subject to very minor suggested amendments which do not alter the meaning of the text, have all supported them. 

That is all committee members.  Thank you all.  

Provided amendments between this draft and the final text are those suggested above or similar minor amendments of grammar, spelling, typos etc that do not alter the meaning of the text then we can reasonably assume that the final documents are approved by all of the committee. 

The documents can or indeed should be considered 'live documents' subject to amendment as or when changes in circumstances dictate.  I would request that the Webmaster(s) kindly keep a watching brief. 

However, I see no reason for the committee to revisit this unless or until significant amendments are required.