Alan
I am with David Webb that end plates will help, no matter what rudder foil you go for. This has been tried by me and many others ( a Phil Bolger idea), and it really cuts the turning radius with such a lo-AR rudder. Make the end-plate with a ‘wing span’ of some 50-70% of the chord. In your case, I also suggest you add a similar ‘cavitation plate’ just below the waterline.
As for foil shape, it depends: If you have filled up the propeller aperture with deadwood, so there is no gap between keel and rudder, there will be little help in making any fancy rudder section. If you on the other hand have built the original space between keel and rudder, I suggest a NACA 00-series section with 15% thickness to chord, that is 125.7mm or 4.95 inches thickness - if you keep the chord of 33 inches. These blunt sections are not prone to stalling. We built one such spade rudder for a 34’/4ton boat here and gave it 18% balance. We gave it over 17% thickness to make room for the rudder stock (freestanding). That rudder ensured powerful steering with light tiller forces.
Now I twisted that rudder foil into one with 15% thickness and 33” chord, and added the numbers at each station. Showing a resolution of 0.1 mm is a bit overkill. Be happy if you approach 1mm resolution.
Cheers,
Arne
PS: Just for the cause of science, I suggest you make the new rudder's profile and size as close as possible to the original.
