Junk rigged Wayfarer dinghy

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 24 Jul 2018 09:05
    Reply # 6395074 on 6394430

    Hi,  

    David Doran here.  Just to clarify a point,  I have not done that much sailing yet in my Wayfarer conversion, so my conversion maybe not the best example to use. 

     Also, my sail area is approx 10.5 SqM versus 13.5 SqM for the Bermudan rig so it it going to be less stressed anyway.   

    I ended up with the mast in exactly the same position as the original Bermudan with a steel tabernacle fitting into the original GRP tabernacle and tapering outward above the deck to the size required for the 3" mast and extending above the deck for 0.5M.  I actually used a piece of box section steel which I tapered down to fit into the GRP tabernacle.   

    The entire 5M Aluminium tube is above deck level.  The tabernacle is held in place by 3 short shrouds to the original forestay fitting and 2 U-bolts which I bolted through the sidedecks which I reinforced underneath. I built up in front of the mast foot using timber and used the original backstop pin in the original mast foot track.  

    My current sail balance in front of the mast is 29% sail area and the split and I think that for more positive feathering, which is more essential in an unballasted dinghyy than a keelboat, I will build another jiblet panel to bring that down to 25%.

    Though I have to say that when I did manage to keep the centreboard fully down when going upwind (it had a non-functioning friction brake), the boat balance was very good,  the tiller was only a couple of degrees off central and I could almost sail it hands-free.  

    As soon as the board slipped back up a bit,  I needed much more tiller to keep it in a straight line,  so the hull balance/mast postion seems fine.  

    I built the rig the size I did because I need a shorter mast to get under a bridge.

    It's too early yet for me to say how truly successful my conversion is.  I've only sailed solo in it and need to do more sailing until I am fully satisfied that it is safe to carry a passenger with the setup I have.  Health and Safety and all that.  



    Best of luck with the build.  Dave.   




    Last modified: 24 Jul 2018 09:15 | Anonymous member
  • 24 Jul 2018 08:27
    Reply # 6395024 on 6395002
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
    Martin wrote:

    Thanks for the response!

    I know David Doran used 3" x 10swg for his Wayfarer dinghy without issues so far.

    I would guess that a Wayfarer is similar enough to an OsloDinghy for our purposes to be a good model. 3 1/2" x 10swg would give a yield moment of around 3000Nm so that is probably the optimal tube so far. These tubes are not expensive so I can try it and see how it goes - I won't be loading it up much anyway.

    Arne - the figures I've got are 260MPa for the breaking stress, 170MPa for the yield stress. I'm using yield stress in my calculations. Is that the right thing to do?

    I'll post more as the design progresses.

    Thanks again,

    Martin

    Yes, I too use yield strength. That's why I found the 170MPa to not fit with the data I have on the 6082-T6 alloy. 

    Arne



    Last modified: 24 Jul 2018 08:42 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 24 Jul 2018 07:00
    Reply # 6395002 on 6394430

    Thanks for the response!

    I know David Doran used 3" x 10swg for his Wayfarer dinghy without issues so far.

    I would guess that a Wayfarer is similar enough to an OsloDinghy for our purposes to be a good model. 3 1/2" x 10swg would give a yield moment of around 3000Nm so that is probably the optimal tube so far. These tubes are not expensive so I can try it and see how it goes - I won't be loading it up much anyway.

    Arne - the figures I've got are 260MPa for the breaking stress, 170MPa for the yield stress. I'm using yield stress in my calculations. Is that the right thing to do?

    I'll post more as the design progresses.

    Thanks again,

    Martin

  • 24 Jul 2018 00:04
    Reply # 6394773 on 6394430
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Martin,

    I once had a 5.5m/200kg Oslodinghy, Broremann.
    The first mast for her was 70mm spruce. This bent more than I appreciated, so I reefed to save the mast rather than to save the boat. Then I had a new mast made, 5.3m long and 90mm at partners. This weighed 10kg. It stood very well up to the sail pressure with hardly any bend in it at all. I didn’t have crews hiking out, but I think she could at least have one big bloke on the rail, in addition to little me.
    Theoretically the thinnest mast had a breaking moment of 153kp (ca. 1500Nm).
    The thickest mast was calculated to 327kpm (ca. 3000Nm)

    My guess is that the Wayfarer should not load the rig much more than the Oslodinghy did.

    About the aluminium tubes you describe:
    It is said to be 6082-T6 with a yield strength of 170MegaPascal(?).
    Something must be wrong here.
    Either the tubes are not  6082-T6, because that has a yield strength of 240-250MPa, or
    or it is 6082-T6 aluminium, but then the tubes would be stronger than in the table.

    Now I double-checked  the 60 x 3mm tube and its strength fits with the yield strength of 170MPa.

    Your calculation of righting moment , 2500Nm looks reasonable, but since it is not a round-the-world-boat, maybe you should lower the safety factor to around 3500Nm?

    An alternative, if you cannot get the 6082 T6, alloy is to build a wooden mast from two standard, clear 2 x 4” spruce planks. That could well be the cheapest and easiest way. Paint it with 2-pot polyurethane paint or varnish, and it will last well.

    Arne


    Last modified: 24 Jul 2018 00:05 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 23 Jul 2018 23:20
    Reply # 6394693 on 6394430

    Remember when comparing mast weight you are comparing a free standing mast with no wire rigging to a bermudan mast with a lot of wires attached, they form part of the weight that you are comparing to. The wire can often almost double the total weight of the rigged mast compared to the bare spar.

    All the best with the project, David.



  • 23 Jul 2018 22:13
    Reply # 6394516 on 6394430

    I've just one piece of empirical evidence to offer. The JRA used to own a Selway Fisher Highlander 18, Ariel, somewhat larger, and with water ballast. As far as I recall, it came with a 4" x 10swg mast as used with the original lug rig, and that was reused when it was converted to junk rig. From memory, it was fine with that mast, and the previous owner had done some quite exposed passages in the Bristol .Channel. 

  • 23 Jul 2018 21:32
    Message # 6394430

    I'm trying to get a handle on the feasibility of converting a Wayfarer dinghy to junk rig. I know this has been done before - thanks for the help everyone! - but I'd like to go through the full exercise anyway.

    The profile seems to work very nicely with a copy-and-paste of Slieve's Poppy Split Junk rig. I haven't tweaked it in any way but as a starting point it looks good. I think it will be possible to mount the mast just aft of the bermudan mast so I don't need to make any irreversible changes to the hull.

    The current sticking point is the mast section. People hike out on dinghies to keep them upright, and on the Wayfarer there could be heavy people on the rail. This is potentially a big righting moment for the mast to cope with.

    To try to get a handle on this I've taken some cross-sectional drawings and played with them. Best guess is that with two people on the rail (150kg total) righting moment at 30 degrees is about 2500Nm. Since this doesn't take acceleration into account, nor buckling of the mast wall, the 2x safety factor suggested by Arne seems about the minimum possible. Thus the mast needs to resist a bending moment of over 5000Nm before yield.

    These are some figures for Aluminium tube in 6082 T6 from Aluminium Warehouse:


    Density kg/m3 2720



    Yield stress 170000000



    Max stress 270000000









    D2 (OD) (mm) t (thickness) (mm) D1 (ID) (mm) Wt for 5m (kg) Yield moment (Nm)
    60 x 3 60 3 54 7.31 1,240
    60 x 5 60 5 50 11.75 1,866
    60 x 10 60 10 40 21.36 2,893
    2 ½ x 16swg 63.5 1.626 60.248 4.30 810
    2 ½ x 10swg 63.5 3.251 56.998 8.37 1,499
    2 ½ x 3/16 63.5 4.7625 53.975 11.95 2,043
    3 x 16swg 76.2 1.626 72.948 5.18 1,182
    3 x 10swg 76.2 3.251 69.698 10.13 2,216
    3 ¼ x 10swg 82.55 3.251 76.048 11.01 2,626
    3 ½ x 16swg 88.9 1.626 85.648 6.06 1,624
    3 ½ x 10swg 88.9 3.251 82.398 11.90 3,072
    3.5 x ¼ 88.9 6.35 76.2 22.40 5,397
    4 x 16swg 101.6 1.626 98.348 6.95 2,136
    4 x 10swg 101.6 3.251 95.098 13.66 4,069
    4 x ¼ 101.6 6.35 88.9 25.84 7,243
    4 ¼ x 10swg 107.95 3.251 101.448 14.54 4,619
    4 ½ x 10swg 114.3 3.251 107.798 15.42 5,205
    4 ½ x ¼ 114.3 6.35 101.6 29.29 9,363
    5 x 10swg 127 3.251 120.498 17.19 6,482
    5 x ¼ 127 6.35 114.3 32.73 11,757
    6 x 10swg 152.4 3.251 145.898 20.72 9,454

    4 1/2" x 10swg (114mm x 3.25mm) seems about the minimum required. This is also about right for the slenderness factor. Downside is that it will be much heavier than I'd like - maybe double the bermudan mast even without a wooden topmast.

    Does this sound like I'm on the right track?

    Thanks!

    1 file
<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software