SibLim update

  • 22 Aug 2018 13:41
    Reply # 6633805 on 4315719

    Time a new Topic heading?  I guess this subject will continue to run.

    Don't suppose I will ever get as far as NZ, but intrigued by the discussion.

    So, can you sail in NZ inshore waters without Cat 1?  Where do inshore waters end...if it is at the 12m limit, then just have to hope that you are not caught passing into international waters....Though of course when you come back they will get you!

    I assume one country can impose any law it likes on visiting yachts once inside the 12m limit? 

  • 22 Aug 2018 13:39
    Reply # 6633804 on 4315719

    To add a little more perspective to the New Zealand position with regard to CAT 1. From New Zealand the nearest adjacent country is about 1,000 miles across some often rough seas. In England it is 21 miles across the Dover straits. It takes a very different level of equipment and experience to go foreign from New Zealand than it does from England. Most countries in Europe the Baltic, The Mediterranean and the Caribbean are within a few miles of adjacent countries and can be accessed by trips that are little more than a day sail. New Zealand has brought in CAT 1 to try to stop the idiots who want to embark on a 1,000 mile offshore journey with inadequate experience and equipment. Unfortunately this creates the situation where those with the experience and knowledge are forced to comply with the expensive and at least partially, heavy handed and bureaucratic CAT 1 requirements. As usual the idiots spoil it for the rest of us.

  • 22 Aug 2018 10:14
    Reply # 6633572 on 4315719

    The point here is that no individual government has total jurisdiction over its citizens in International Waters, or the High Seas, as the NZ government is claiming to do. Inside NZ territorial waters, its citizens may be expected to abide by its laws, rules and regulations, and if the NZ government wishes to specify equipment that SibLim must carry, it is entitled to do so. Once they sail outside of NZ territorial waters, its citizens are entitled to do as they please, subject only to the international Law of the Sea. SibLim is entitled to sail to Fiji carrying only such equipment as the owner and skipper shall see fit. 

    In the field of merchant shipping, the SOLAS Convention applies, and lays down safety standards for 99% of commercial shipping. It is an international maritime treaty. Fair enough.

    In the field of leisure boating, there is no such international treaty. The NZ government takes too much upon itself. When it tried to impose Cat 1 on foreign-flagged yachts, there was an international furore, and it was forced to withdraw. Even the authoritarian USA government imposes safety regulations on yachts, including foreign-flagged yachts, but recognises that its jurisdiction stops at the twelve mile limit.

    Last modified: 22 Aug 2018 12:25 | Anonymous member
  • 22 Aug 2018 08:15
    Reply # 6633476 on 6585365
    David Thatcher wrote:If you are prepared to look past the whole thing about 'I am told I must have'

    That's the whole point, David. I'm not prepared to look past the compulsion.  The real point is that I don't care whether the gear is good or bad, useful or a damn nuisance: my fundamental objection is that someone insists that I put certain pieces of equipment on my boat regardless of my opinion.  And, I repeat, I don't wish to communicate with other people at sea - by radio or by telephone.


    Would you like someone to come into your home, examine your preparations in case of earthquake; walk around the house telling you to move this, rehang that, alter the other because in their opinion it could constitute a hazard; ask you daughter to recite what she needs to do in an earthquake; go through your supplies and tell you that you have too much of this and insufficient of that?  Well, you are very safety conscious, perhaps you would, but I know I wouldn't and nor would most people.  To me, the Cat 1 requirement is the same thing.  I believe that I have considered what I'm doing and prepared myself adequately.  I dare say most people in NZ think the same about their earthquake preparations, if they've thought about them at all. 

    I checked the price of the Part B New Zealand registration. It has gone up from $500 odd dollars in 2013 to $1100 now. I think that is very unreasonable. How can there be $1100 of paperwork involved?! But for sailing offshore a boat needs to have registration, so it might still be the best option for us living in NZ. A friend registered his yacht with a certain yacht club in Germany which gives German registration. I no longer have the details but it worked for him. Oddly enough he still took most of the safety equipment including a Sat-phone on a purely voluntary basis. He did not take a life raft because his boat was a multihull and reasonably unsinkable. When I cruised offshore on my Searunner trimaran I took a life boat rather than a raft, and that had Cat 1 approval.

    How is the boat coming on?

    The cost of registration is ludicrous.  It's essentially a tax on what are perceived to be wealthy yachtsmen. And unfortunately, most of them are these days, because the idea of sailing in a boat under 40 feet is unthinkable.

    Your friend, taking most of the 'safety' equipment simply goes to back up my argument: it's not whether or not you want the stuff, it's being told that you have to take it that grates.  The confiscating of your responsibility and autonomy: the antithesis of what long-distance sailing is supposed to be about.  But your final paragraph also shows up how ludicrous Cat 1 is: "He did not take a life raft because his boat was a multihull and reasonably unsinkable", you say.  And obviously this was accepted.  What about if he had a fire on board?

    I rest my case m'lud.

    The boat moves slowly due to the amount of head scratching about the saloon/galley details that has been going on. I  think I've worked out most of my solutions, now, but I've been spending a fair bit of time running round looking at stuff and waving a tape measure around.  I've also been painting and varnishing.  I'll do an update on Sunday.

  • 21 Aug 2018 06:53
    Reply # 6585365 on 6583607
    Deleted user
    Annie Hill wrote:Actually, this discussion isn't that much off topic, because SibLim in many ways, represents everything I feel about sailing.

    My fundamental objection to "Cat 1" is, as David W says, that it's all about rescue: it's not about safety.  I don't want to be rescued and I don't want the Government to assume that I do. 


    Actually no, Cat 1 is not all about Rescue, it is very much about properly prepared boats and sailors sailing safely offshore so the need of rescue is minimised as much as is humanly possible. Yes, it is true that a couple of life rings and associated equipment are not going to be much use for the solo sailor as he or she falls overboard and watches the boat sail over the horizon, but somewhere/sometime you are going to take other people out sailing, so at least one of those life rings could possibly come in handy sometime.

    If you are prepared to look past the whole thing about 'I am told I must have' to 'the benefits of the Cat 1 requirements it is hard to see it being unreasonable. It is about ensuring your boat is suitable for offshore voyaging, Having the means to prevent someone falling overboard, or if that should happen having a means of rescue. Having bilge pumps to cope with a possible influx of water. Having suitable storm sails. Having a secondary means of steering should your rudder fail. A first Aid kit to deal with potential medical emergencies. We already had a good First Aid kit. For Cat 1 we purchased some extra bandages and dressings, and got the required drugs under prescription from our Doctor at something like $3 an item. Some of those required drugs turned out to be very handy in places like the Solomon Islands where access to drugs we needed was very limited otherwise. We had to be prepared for emergencies so I put together a set of emergency procedures which we have laminated and displayed at our chart table as a quick reference. I also have a laminated plan of the boat showing where various items of safety equipment are located. That way if something happens to me Alison can find the information she needs. 

    I used to think the four required buckets were a bit over the top, but then when you loose a bucket overboard, and then need a couple of buckets for the on-board laundry process, all of a sudden four buckets is not too many. One of my buckets was accepted as part of the number even though it was currently used to store the composting medium for our toilet, so that was a pretty reasonable approach by the safety inspector. You also do not have to carry an SSB radio. A Sat-phone is an acceptable alternative, and much more useful than an SSB.

    I checked the price of the Part B New Zealand registration. It has gone up from $500 odd dollars in 2013 to $1100 now. I think that is very unreasonable. How can there be $1100 of paperwork involved?! But for sailing offshore a boat needs to have registration, so it might still be the best option for us living in NZ. A friend registered his yacht with a certain yacht club in Germany which gives German registration. I no longer have the details but it worked for him. Oddly enough he still took most of the safety equipment including a Sat-phone on a purely voluntary basis. He did not take a life raft because his boat was a multihull and reasonably unsinkable. When I cruised offshore on my Searunner trimaran I took a life boat rather than a raft, and that had Cat 1 approval.

    How is the boat coming on?




    Last modified: 22 Aug 2018 04:24 | Deleted user
  • 20 Aug 2018 10:34
    Reply # 6583680 on 6583641
    Anonymous wrote:

    Well argued, Annie. 

    The UK must be one of the few countries left where registration, and equipment carried, are entirely at the owner's discretion. The RNLI will advise on "rescue" and "safety" equipment that they think a boat ought to carry, but that's all it is - advice. Not a heavy handed Nanny State that thinks it knows best. 

    We need registration, not for our own country's uses, but for other countries, when we visit, to be able to see a document that establishes the boat's nationality, as they need to see a passport to establish our own. That's all, and it was worth £25 over five years for me to get an SSR number for Weaverbird, so that I can visit the Republic of Ireland, should I wish to do so. It wouldn't be worth more.


    I've looked into several of the foreign flag options.  The problem with UK SSR is that even if you are a UK National or EU passport holder (Brexit notwithstanding) is that you have to lived for 180 days per year at the UK address you domicile on your SSR application when you attempt to register your boat initially.  That counts me out. Probably counts the likes of Annie out too as she has been too long out of the country...though there might be sneaky ways around it like using a family member's name and address.

    Guernsey is better but more expensive.  You need a Tonnage survey, and three Bills of Sale going back a couple owners previous to the person you bought the boat off, although in Annies case a new build would get around that.
    You then get 10 years and and get to fly the Red ensign or the Guernsey flag itself if you wish, and only a small renewal fee to boot. THe initial fee though works out about the same as NZ when you factor in the cost of the Tonnage survey.  For me, as I could not supply the most recent bill of sale,, let alone the two previous, they could not register my boat and turned me down.

    I'm currently investigating Malaysian flag, but I still need the current bill of sale, which I don't have.  I might be able to track down the previous owner and get him to fill one out.  It's something I didn't think about when I bought the boat. I just shook his hand and put the money in his Bank account...a very Kiwi way of doing things.

    If I end up registering with NZ, then ship my boat overseas then the NZ Cat 1 does not apply.  There is no law to stop me registering here in NZ and starting a voyage from overseas by the way.  But if I am sailing from NZ, under a NZ boat reg, then there is absolutely no way around Cat 1.

      


    Last modified: 20 Aug 2018 10:57 | Anonymous member
  • 20 Aug 2018 09:04
    Reply # 6583641 on 4315719

    Well argued, Annie. 

    The UK must be one of the few countries left where registration, and equipment carried, are entirely at the owner's discretion. The RNLI will advise on "rescue" and "safety" equipment that they think a boat ought to carry, but that's all it is - advice. Not a heavy handed Nanny State that thinks it knows best. 

    We need registration, not for our own country's uses, but for other countries, when we visit, to be able to see a document that establishes the boat's nationality, as they need to see a passport to establish our own. That's all, and it was worth £25 over five years for me to get an SSR number for Weaverbird, so that I can visit the Republic of Ireland, should I wish to do so. It wouldn't be worth more.

  • 20 Aug 2018 08:46
    Reply # 6583607 on 4315719
    Actually, this discussion isn't that much off topic, because SibLim in many ways, represents everything I feel about sailing.

    My fundamental objection to "Cat 1" is, as David W says, that it's all about rescue: it's not about safety.  I don't want to be rescued and I don't want the Government to assume that I do. 

    The filter I would choose, assuming that evolution in action is considered unacceptable, is that if you have a radio you carry full insurance.  If you don't you - literally - sink or swim according to your capacity to learn in a hurry. 

    And I don't want a life raft.  If my big boat has sunk, I'm damn sure it's not going to be much fun in a little one.  Moreover, the kindest and most broad minded of inspectors is not going to pass my 5ft dinghy as a life raft.  And I don't want to convert a boat into one and then have something that is to heavy for me to carry up the beach on my own.

    Regulations have to complied with?  Why do we need the regulations in the first place, is my question.  Lots of countries manage perfectly well without them.  All I'm asking for is to be left in peace to do my own thing, without inconveniencing others.

    I used to have third party insurance, but now it's almost as much as full insurance.  So I've built a light, small boat that, handled with care, can't really do too much damage.

    I should like to do as i did when I was 20, hoist my country's ensign on the back of my totally unsuitable boat, and sail off on an adventure.  But I can't, because the authorities in this country control my sailing offshore far more carefully than they control me on the road, where someone dies just about every day.

    I don't want to talk to people ashore when I'm at sea and I don't want them to talk to me.  What's the point of being alone on the ocean if you still have an umbilical attaching you to the land? 

    I don't want to burden my boat with man overboard equipment when I sail single-handed.

    I don't want anyone else telling me how I should fit out my boat.  Sailing is one of the last truly free adventures on the planet.  Or should be.  What difference does it make to Kiwi bureaucrats if I sail off and don't arrive anywhere?  They should be happy that they won't have to pay my pension or end-of-life medical bills.

    This is my thread: these are my thoughts.  I don't expect people to agree with me in the 21st century, but I do expect to be allowed to live my own life the way I want to, as long as it's not adversely affecting other people.

  • 19 Aug 2018 21:00
    Reply # 6582959 on 6582258
    Anonymous wrote:

    Just a question from an ignorant:

    Can you have the boat un-registered, and in case of yes, what waters can one use it in?

    Arne


    Yes, if you don't want to sail to another country then you can leave boat unregistered.  Actually, if you only want to sail in NZ then you don't need any boat papers what so-ever, save a minimum of 3rd party insurance if you want to stay at marinas'.

    Its only when you want to sail to another country that the red tape kicks in.

    You never know Arne, I may be putting my Contessa on a freighter and start my future voyage from Europe in the years ahead, if this Cat 1 stuff proves all too much.  It  actually would be the 'Classic' passage for a small yacht that doesn't go around Cape Horn, i.e Europe, West Indies, Panama, South Pacific, NZ - and actually has a lot of appeal to me.  You never know.  I'd certainly like to see how she sails against Ingeborg being a close sister ship.

    For now though (when I finally launch!), I will be pottering around NZ waters, zooming past Siblim, Sweet Thursday, and Le Cardin Bleu in the Tall Ships regattas and junkettes...!!?? ...well that might be a stretch as they are all superior sailors to moi who is still very green at all this.

    Last modified: 19 Aug 2018 21:13 | Anonymous member
  • 19 Aug 2018 10:28
    Reply # 6582258 on 4315719
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Just a question from an ignorant:

    Can you have the boat un-registered, and in case of yes, what waters can one use it in?

    Arne

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software