Damage to Arion's sail

  • 03 Nov 2015 19:45
    Reply # 3614435 on 3607013
    Arne: yes, my sail has a webbing boltrope all round (such as you use, these days).  I think that what happened when I hauled on my original luff-hauling parrel system, was that by pulling the battens at the luff of the sail together, it tensioned the leech, and in spite of the boltrope and there not being much camber in the upper panels, somehow stress was transferred to the cloth forward of the leech and along the yard.  The leech has never flogged and the cloth that was damaged is no more exposed to sun than the rest of the sail.

    By and large, I've decided I'm not that fond of Odyssey or the similar cloths.  I'm going back to good old acrylic for SibLim's sail and the hell with the chafe!

    I agree with you about high aspect ratio.  I've always preferred it, but on the other hand, I like a short mast, too.  When I was designing my rig for Fantail, I was persuaded by the fact that 5m alloy tubes were available, that using these was a good plan.  (Ever the thrifty soul, I didn't want to waste the alloy by cutting them short).  While Fantail sails very well and the sail is fine to handle, I am going back to HAR for my next sail.  It's horses for courses and, there being so few junks being actively sailed and even fewer people reporting on their experiences, we are still all learning.  Thank heavens for these fora where our experiences can be shared in 'real time' rather than via four-monthly magazines.

    David (Kiwi).  When I spoke to the Odyssey people, they told me that the shiny side was supposed to go away from the sun!

    Graham - sorry to hear about your issues and I know that cold feeling of horror only too well.  I don't think Odyssey is ripstop - I could easily extend the tears in the damaged section of my sail.  However, the patches seem to have done the job.  If you want to repair your sail without taking it off the mast, I recommend having your lazy jacks set up so that you can lower the sail onto the deck.  (You may need to cast off the mast lift, too.)  This makes it a lot easier to work on and you can pull battens part way out if needs be. 

    I've used contact adhesive before now, for patches.  Two drawbacks: it's often a dark colour and shows up on a light sail and/or darkens over time.  It makes sewing, later, very hard work.

  • 02 Nov 2015 21:15
    Reply # 3612247 on 3607013
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Patching smaller holes.
    Could it be an idea to use contact adhesive? That stuff lets one fit a patch without needing pressure at all, and it doesn’t get brittle either. I guess I would glue the uncoated sides to each other, if I had a choice. I believe that would give better grip and the out-facing, coated sides would then provide the UV-protection.

    Corner patches on a junk sail.
    Ok, ok, as said, it may be a good idea to fit patches to the peak and even the throat, but so far, my use of stout boltropes (rope or 50mm webbing) have worked well enough for my fair-weather sailing. However, I simply see no point is fitting them to the tack and clew (those corners down at the boom). My very first junksail, made by Lucas, had four king size corner patches with huge hydraulic-pressed eyelets. For a whole summer, I sailed with the clew tied to the boom with only one single whipping twine (waxed, if you need to know). It never broke  -  long before it saw any serious load, I had reefed away that panel.

    What did break, on the other hand, was the closed, aft end of the batten pockets: Within the five first hours of sailing, all the battens had come poking out. The sailmakers clearly had no clue on where the loads went in junk sails in those days...

    Arne

     

    Last modified: 02 Nov 2015 21:16 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 02 Nov 2015 19:19
    Reply # 3612032 on 3607013

    Like Arne, I favour adding a wide doubler to the luff and leech, to add to the weight and to slow down the rate of fluttering. I increase the width of this doubler in the top panel, to add extra strength.

    Unlike Arne, I think that there is a very strong reason to add graduated corner patches, of increasing size, particularly to the peak of the sail, where all the vertical loads are concentrated, but also to the throat area. I believe that the breakdown that both Annie and Graham are seeing is due to overloading of the Odyssey cloth, rather than UV damage. My current sails are of Mustang cloth, but I've used Top Gun for the yard pocket. Sufficient doubling of the Odyssey in the top panel should be enough, but there might be an argument for using heavier cloth here instead.

    For repairing small holes, I glue on patches with clear polyurethane. In Australia, there's Selleys Polyurethane Bond, in other countries "Seam Grip" can be found in camping stores. Dampen the sail, apply urethane to the patch, and use a hot iron to press the patch on against a firm flat piece of wood. That way, the urethane sets in minutes, sufficiently well to be handled, but leave the sail undisturbed for a day before hoisting again. 

  • 02 Nov 2015 03:55
    Reply # 3610537 on 3607013

    I've now sewn a patch on either side of the sail.  It is the roughest looking patch you could ever imagine, but I think it will hold and I'll put some more, smaller, stitches in when I get some more sail thread tomorrow.  On reflection, I am impressed that the hole in the sail did not get any bigger than the damaged area, despite sailing 35 miles in 20 knot winds.  I had earlier noted that my offcuts of Odyssey were resistant to tearing, ripstop, as Arne calls it.  The rest of the sail looks a bit scuffed and faded in places but I can find no other areas that I can tear with my fingers, so I'm opting for the chafe theory, probably caused by the sail being pinched between the yard and the preventer.  Arne's idea of false vertical seams makes sense to me for an offshore sail, though if the material is not going to tear if it gets a hole in it then perhaps it is not necessary. 

    I have found another tiny hole in the second panel up but am just going to watch it, partially  to see what it does and partly because it is in the middle of the panel, and working on it would require taking the sail off, with all the hassle that entails.  If I did have to nominate one thing about junk rigs I don't like, it would be the difficulty of working on the sail when furled.  At least you can usually wait until you get to port before taking the sail off.  I wouldn't fancy my chances sailing with a big hole in my genoa or bermudian mainsail.  I am always amused by photos of ocean-going Chinese junks with sails full of holes, and I remember Annie writing about making long passages in Badger with holes in the sails so big you could climb through them!

    I'd be interested in hearing about people's experiences with repairing junk sails.  Is there an easier way than taking the sail off the mast, removing the spars and taking the sail ashore or into the cabin, assuming you are not just repairing the luff or leach?

  • 01 Nov 2015 01:32
    Reply # 3609355 on 3607013

    The shape of La Chica's is neither van Loan nor Hasler McLeod but a hybrid. The body is standard but for the top panels the angle of the peak is altered so that the mid point of the yard falls under the halyard block. The reason for this being variable is because the sails have different amounts of balance (the amount that the sail projects forward beyond the mast), in general, the more balance you have, the lower the peak angle and the less balance you have the higher the peak angle. If you get this point right, the sails essentially position them selves. Get it wrong and you can really struggle. I learnt this the hard way when I did the rig for Carl Bostek's Aphrodite. The sails are also of moderate aspect ratio which also helps them set better. One change I did make last summer was (on the main sail) to move the standing part of the halyard 10% of the yard length aft. This has resulted in the peaking action of the halyard being strong that the THP has become redundant. I have not removed it yet but it now does nothing and I will remove it this summer. I will also be doing the same to the foresail.

    As for the construction, the luff has 4 layers of reinforcing at 200mm and 100 mm plus all the corners. The leach has six layers at 300, 200 and 100. This summer will be our third year and so far no issues what so ever. The cloth is Mustang which is coated on both sides and is slightly heavier than Odyssey III but is otherwise a similar material. The sails are built using the "shelf foot" method.

  • 31 Oct 2015 10:24
    Reply # 3608758 on 3607013
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Graham,
    I am glad to read that the damage in your sail seems to be limited to a spot near the peak.

    Frankly, I think that fitting reinforcing patches on the corners of junksails is waste of time and money, maybe with the exception of the peak, which takes by far the highest load of all the corners.

    If I were to beef up a sail (during construction) to make it last longer, I would rather double the cloth along the full length of the luff and leech, at a width of, say 2-300mm or thereabouts. This would partly be done for strength, but maily to make the edges of the sail stiffer and heavier, and thus less prone to flogging. In addition, this would ensure that both sides of the sail would have the sun-stopping coating in these areas.

    You suggest you will make the next sail from vertical panels to avoid having panels ripped from luff to leech. I would say that with any rip-stop-woven cloth, like that of Odyssey or Malena’s and Johanna’s blue nylon cloth, such a rip can hardly happen. However, if you have to do something to restore peace of mind, I would rather suggest that you on each panel sew on three 10-15mm wide strips of webbing, thus making “false vertical seams”. Thrust me, these will be just as strong, or stronger that using true vertical panels, and the webbing will go on a lot faster.

    Switching from eyelets to sewn on hoops sounds good. I have only good experience with that.

    Good luck!

    Arne

     

  • 31 Oct 2015 08:33
    Reply # 3608681 on 3607013

    Well, I made it to Broken bay, 35 miles in a 20 knot following wind and 2 metre seas.  As expected, my homeward bound stitches failed due to the weakness of the surrounding cloth and a hole about 300mm x 75mm appeared, but my very strong boltrope/ leech tabling held the sail together and the sail did not tear right across, as I feared it might. 

    The good news is that this appears to be the only seriously weak patch in the sail, an area of about 400mm x 100mm, near the leech, just below the peak, so I won't have to scrap the sail after all!  Just a panic attack when it happened at dusk yesterday, on the eve of a passage.  It may be caused by the tension on the THP, but I'd be surprised if it is, as my Arne type sail does not seem to have very high loads on the THP and my top panels are almost flat cut. 

    It looks like chafe, but that is also puzzling as there are lots of other places in the rig, such as where the sail is pinched between the mast and the battens, which I have always worried about but which seem fine.  I have been wrapping a preventer around the bundle near that point and hauling the sail bundle outboard when at anchor, tensioning it against the sheet, to stop the bundle squeaking against the mast when rolling in a swell (don't you hate that!) and also to expose the solar panels.  Perhaps this has somehow pinched the sail and worn that patch tissue thin.  Whatever, I will just glue a big patch on either side and carry on. 

    I am pleased to say that the rest of the sail appears to have plenty of life in it.  Odyssey is a light, stretchy material and my cambered panels set nicely in a light breeze, but I have had trouble with eyelets pulling out if it and a few straight-stitched seams pulling apart.  I have reinforced these areas with extra stitching and it seems to hold together. (Next time I'll use strops instead of eyelets).

    For offshore work I'd like a sail with vertical, triple stitched seams and good reinforcing patches.  That way, if you get a few holes here and there they won't matter.  With my sail, where each panel is made up from one piece of cloth, if you do get a hole it can take out the whole panel.  I like 5 oz Dacron, as it is strong and chafe resistant, but I have read that it is more subject to chafing where it is pinched on a junk rig than softer materials.  I am still a babe in the woods with this rig, so don't have any firm opinions.  I do have a beautifully built flat Dacron sail on board which I will probably refit if my cambered sail falls to bits, which would give me some experience with this material.  But I love the performance of my cambered sail so won't change it unless I have to.

  • 30 Oct 2015 22:05
    Reply # 3608294 on 3607013
    Deleted user

    So far no sign of any damage on 'Footprints' sail which is constructed from proper sail cloth, and I have done a lot of miles since fitting the sail 4 years ago. I wonder if the awning type fabrics are not really built to take heavy loads, unlike sail cloth which is designed for loads. Another potential problem with some awning fabrics when used for sails is that the fabric only has a UV protective coating on one side which is intended to be the 'up' side when used in cover applications. When I purchased the fabric for my sail cover the salesperson made it very clear to be that if I did not have the coated side of the fabric facing up I could expect only a very short lifespan from the fabric. 

    Last modified: 30 Oct 2015 23:58 | Deleted user
  • 30 Oct 2015 21:34
    Reply # 3608284 on 3607013
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Could I ask both of you, Annie and Graham , if your sails have a strong load-bearing boltrope all around them? If yes, I struggle with seeing how the luff (now throat) hauling parrel could overload the sail cloth. To me it appears that the THP/YHP combination (plus a light help from the Hong Kong parrels) simply offload the sailcloth when set up. My sailing has been too easy and coastwise to be any proof why my present sails have not had these problems.

    When my Malena's three top panels finally started to fall apart, in 2009, I am pretty sure it was a combination of sunshine and flogging that caused it to happen. I never covered the sail (but tied up the bundle after each sail), while the new owners, since 2000 never tied up the sail either.

    Arne


    PS: Malena during the rally in 2010, with holes in the 3 upper panels. I remember the cloth, once very soft, now felt stiff and paper-like on the worn places. That sail lasted for 15 years, but at 59deg north and in gentle coastal sailing I bet even that nylon canvas would last 3 - 5 times as long as in Australia.

    PPS: Annie, I think the main reason for the light loads on sails like Badger's sail much comes from them being of high aspect ratio. That puts the CG of each sail closer to the mast and the parrels forces needed are light. My sail on Broremann (AR=2.15) was by far the most well-behaved I have had, despite it being set with a 70 degree yard and only about 10% balance.

    Last modified: 30 Oct 2015 21:54 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 30 Oct 2015 21:05
    Reply # 3608267 on 3607013
    I discovered something similar with Fantail's sail about 18 months ago and posted about it on the sail material posting, if my memory serves.  At the time, I thought it was sun damage, but having removed the sail and inspected (and repaired it), I now reckon the damage was cause by the severe loadings imparted to a cambered sail from the running luff parrel.  I think it puts the cloth in the upper leach and part of the head of the sail under tension, stressing the fibres and weakening the cloth.  That's my theory, anyway.  The rest of the sail is just fine.  In your case, you can simply put patches in way of the weakened cloth, the job on as some routine maintenance that will regularly be required.  You have, after all, had quite a few miles from the sail already.

    One of the sails on La Chica, although fitted with running luff parrels, doesn't require them to get the shape, which is more of a Van Loan sail plan.  Having discussed these issues with David, this is the shape I am going for on SibLim, with the added proviso that I am going to make as many scale models as required, until I get them to set without the need for any running luff parrel.

    One of the things I really, really loved about Badger's rig was the fact that the loads were so light.  I don't think heavily loaded lines should be a part of junk rig, personally, and will do all that is required (short of going back to a flat sail) to eliminate them.

    Last modified: 30 Oct 2015 21:06 | Anonymous member
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software