New sail plans for Shoestring

  • 07 Nov 2014 09:47
    Reply # 3144524 on 3138921
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Yes, I guessed that I would err on the safe side. At which heeling angle does the boat have max righting moment? Those 160degress must have been the capsize point , for sure?

    Arne 

    PS: Anyway, if we plan the mast with a strength factor of 2.5, with Mr=2600kpm, the breaking moment of the CF mast could be reduced to 6500kpm (from my pessimistic 9000kpm).

    Last modified: 07 Nov 2014 09:51 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 07 Nov 2014 09:36
    Reply # 3144523 on 3138921
    Hello again Arne, Yes, I gave you a bit of extra work. I dug out a copy of the hand drawn curve. You are bang on. According to the drawing, with 2 tonne keel and 5 tonnes total displacement, the righting moment is 2.6kpm and 160 degrees of heel...not that I want to be there!
  • 06 Nov 2014 21:31
    Reply # 3144276 on 3138921
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Thank you Roger.
    With those data in place, it should be possible to guess the righting moment of the Underwood 33 within about 20% accuracy.

    With a decent ballast ratio of 2000kg/4500kg = 44%, but with a quite shallow draught of 1.0m, I would guess that the righting lever is hardly longer than 1/5 of the beam of the boat (probably a bit shorter).

    That is, Lr = Beam/5 = 3.4m/5 = 0.67m

    Then the righting moment,
    Mr = Displacement x Lr
    = 4500kg x 0.67m = 3015kpm, or rather, the righting moment,
    Mr will sit somewhere between 2400kpm and 3600kpm (+/-20%).

    Then it is the question of strength factor, depending on the kind of sailing one has in mind. As I did in an earlier posting, I suggest that the actual breaking moment of the mast should be between 3.0 x Mr for ocean voyaging, down to 2.0 x Mr for lighter coastal work.

    Those numbers were with a spruce mast in mind. I think that one can cut these factors a bit lower when using aluminium poles or carbon masts (provided that the mast builder knows his/her stuff). The reason for me reasoning like this is that the lighter CF and AL masts put much less peak stress on themselves (whipping) as the boat is rocking and rolling in a seaway. Maybe the strength factors 3.0 and 2.0 could be reduced to 2.5 and 1.5 on CF masts.

    The strongest CF mast should then  -  at strongest version  -  have a breaking moment
    Mb = 3600kpm x 2.5 = 9000kpm

    I realise that I am on thin ice on this matter of strength factor. Anyone would be. The only way to collect some real data on this, would be to fit pressure sensors with logging capacity on either the mast partner(s) or the mast step(s).

    Cheers, Arne

    PS: Roger, could it be that Gary Underwood already has worked out the curve of the righting lever (righting arm)?

     

    Last modified: 07 Nov 2014 11:58 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 06 Nov 2014 19:49
    Reply # 3144170 on 3143664
    Arne Kverneland wrote:

    It would be useful to know the beam and draught as well. I have tried in vain to find the specs of the Underwood 33 on the web.

    Arne

    Arne

    Let me see if I can get hold of them for you.

  • 06 Nov 2014 18:07
    Reply # 3144083 on 3138921

    Hi Peter,

    No, I've done a brief search in Aus but too many outlets and didn't have the time to study all of them. That's a good help. Shipping would be a lot cheaper than from the US or Europe.

    Thank you

  • 06 Nov 2014 18:02
    Reply # 3144079 on 3138921
    Thanks for the reminder Arne.

    The Beam is 3.4 metres

    Draft is 1.0 metres

    LWL 10.0 metres

    LOA 10.5 metres

  • 06 Nov 2014 12:16
    Reply # 3143684 on 3140922
    Anonymous
    Roger Scott wrote:

    Hi Arne,

    .. I am also thinking of a CF mast in the current position without a tabernacle. In that case the LAP would be 10.5 meters.

    Roger

    Hi Roger,

    as you are considering CF masts, have you ever tried the following website?

    http://www.harryproa.com/index.php/carbon-masts

    They are situated in AUS and claim to manufacture CF masts at very reasonable prices.

    Hope this is helpful.

    Cheers
    Peter


  • 06 Nov 2014 09:41
    Reply # 3143664 on 3140922
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
    Roger Scott wrote:

    Hi Arne,

    Displacement is around 4.5 tonnes empty and 5.5 tonnes loaded, ballast is 2 tonnes and with a tabernacle mast LAP would be 9.5M max. I am also thinking of a CF mast in the current position without a tabernacle. In that case the LAP would be 10.5 meters.

    Roger


    It would be useful to know the beam and draught as well. I have tried in vain to find the specs of the Underwood 33 on the web.

    Arne

  • 05 Nov 2014 09:44
    Reply # 3140932 on 3138921

    Hi David,

    I am always open for ideas. Yes, I was looking at Poppy today in issue 65. It looks good. I'll need to study up though.

    I had a chat to local boat builder today as well. He thinks CF is the way to go and recommended looking up Nigel Iren's luggers with CF masts. A 70kg mast sounds attractive. Easy to rake, shift position or even lift out, but still considering the loss of weight aloft and how it might affect moment. No decisions yet!


  • 05 Nov 2014 09:27
    Reply # 3140922 on 3138921

    Hi Arne,

    Displacement is around 4.5 tonnes empty and 5.5 tonnes loaded, ballast is 2 tonnes and with a tabernacle mast LAP would be 9.5M max. I am also thinking of a CF mast in the current position without a tabernacle. In that case the LAP would be 10.5 meters.

    Roger

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software