Do we have a scantling for battens guide on cambered rigs yet?

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 28 Apr 2014 01:54
    Reply # 1544085 on 1541618
    I managed to bend one of my battens a couple of months ago.  It might have been while I was trying to get to windward in F6, or it might have been a few hours later, when the bolt holding the main halliard block sheered, and I had to raise the sail via the burgee block.  This batten that the running LHP attached to it and went via two blocks to the deck.  There were really heavy loads on the line and I didn't like it a bit.  I managed to straighten the batten and, after some experimentation,  am now running the LHP from the same batten, but only once around the mast.  The load is considerably reduced, I only have only one  creased panel (second from bottom), and am much happier with the set up.

    The batten in question is alloy: 38.1 dia x 1.42 wall 6063 H8
  • 25 Apr 2014 03:08
    Reply # 1543191 on 1542743
    Deleted user
    Arne Kverneland wrote:..

    I think that from now on, I will let the “default” position of the halyard’s slingpoint be about 3 – 5% aft of the yard’s midpoint. To achieve this, the mast must be long enough, so the halyard will not point over 30° away from the mast, with the sail fully hoisted.


    Yes, I will try this on the foresail. Thanks.
    I think the batten bent while going downwind, probably pushed it too hard, had a couple unpleasant gybes too.
  • 24 Apr 2014 14:35
    Reply # 1542822 on 1542743
    Arne Kverneland wrote:... I tried tying the halyard a bit aft of the middle of the yard. This seems to have these benefits:

    1.       The sail is immune to dropping the peak when hoisting or reefing the sail.

    2.       With the aft-set slingpoint the need for high control forces in the YHP and THP will be reduced. Maybe this could ease the loads on batten no 2, or?

     

     

    I think that from now on, I will let the “default” position of the halyard’s slingpoint be about 3 – 5% aft of the yard’s midpoint. To achieve this, the mast must be long enough, so the halyard will not point over 30° away from the mast, with the sail fully hoisted.

     

     

    Cheers, Arne

    Yes, I've tried this, too. I have a span on the yard, to which the halyard block is tied, so it's easy to do. Unfortunately my mast is not long enough to move the attachment point very far, but I do think it reduces peaking-up loads on a high-peaked sail.
  • 24 Apr 2014 09:07
    Reply # 1542743 on 1541618
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Batten loads  - and about moving the slingpoint aft

    Reading through this thread confirms my belief that it is not easy to make a general formula to find the right strength of battens.

     

    It surprises me to read how Gary King bent his battens at the mast. My experience is that the battens seems to struggle mostly in the mid section.  David Thatcher’s idea with hybrid wood-aluminium is interesting. Since the wood is in the fwd end, it will not suffer high peak loads at gybing.

     

     

    One thing I learned from sailing my latest boat, Frøken Sørensen, last summer: Since I was more generous with mast length this time, I tried tying the halyard a bit aft of the middle of the yard. This seems to have these benefits:

    1.       The sail is immune to dropping the peak when hoisting or reefing the sail.

    2.       With the aft-set slingpoint the need for high control forces in the YHP and THP will be reduced. Maybe this could ease the loads on batten no 2, or?

     

     

    I think that from now on, I will let the “default” position of the halyard’s slingpoint be about 3 – 5% aft of the yard’s midpoint. To achieve this, the mast must be long enough, so the halyard will not point over 30° away from the mast, with the sail fully hoisted.

     

     

    Cheers, Arne

    Last modified: 24 Apr 2014 10:26 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 23 Apr 2014 22:56
    Reply # 1542588 on 1542242
    Deleted user
    Gary King wrote:Just had a read of Oscar's batten DB and I'm speechless. Ashiki has the strongest battens yet only hers bent. I don't know what to make of that..
    Maybe everyone else has T6.
    Maybe Oscar's database has some errors in it! That's why we need a few other members to rubber stamp it before we make it 'official'. Like Annie and others did for the mast database, details of which can be found in the same Join In forum. 

    Last modified: 23 Apr 2014 22:57 | Deleted user
  • 23 Apr 2014 21:39
    Reply # 1542571 on 1542242
    Deleted user
    Gary King wrote:Just had a read of Oscar's batten DB and I'm speechless. Ashiki has the strongest battens yet only hers bent. I don't know what to make of that..
    Maybe everyone else has T6.

    The three alloy battens on Footprints are T5. I am amazed that after two years including our voyage to New Caledonia that we have not had any issues with them. The battens are 60mm diameter with from memory a  1.5 mm wall thickness. I have 5m of alloy batten with an extra 1.5m of cedar extension on the fwd end making a total batten length of 6.5m. The battens have survived numerous crash gybes plus the rigors of two ocean crossings.
  • 23 Apr 2014 11:52
    Reply # 1542242 on 1541618
    Deleted user
    Just had a read of Oscar's batten DB and I'm speechless. Ashiki has the strongest battens yet only hers bent. I don't know what to make of that..
    Maybe everyone else has T6.
    Last modified: 23 Apr 2014 11:53 | Deleted user
  • 23 Apr 2014 11:03
    Reply # 1542233 on 1541618
    Deleted user
    To answer Gary's original question and get back on topic, the answer is Yes, try the Batten Spec Database in the Join In 'JRA & Members' Projects' forum here.

    I'm not sure that this project has got as far as it's coordinator Oscar would wish. It can be a little tough beavering away at that kind of stuff. Perhaps others would, like Paul Thompson, try to help via that thread?
    Last modified: 23 Apr 2014 22:50 | Deleted user
  • 23 Apr 2014 10:11
    Reply # 1542224 on 1542081
    Deleted user
    Graham Cox wrote:PS: I am no longer moderating this forum as I have been having some health problems.  I think Brian is doing it again.
    Hi Graham. I mentioned that in the relevant Join In forum thread, but forgot to mention it here. Apologies. Here's wishing you well. I have really appreciated your help, all the articles you've written and the many Really Useful posts. I'm trying to keep an eye on all the forums again now, until Paul takes over May 3rd-ish. Cheers.
  • 23 Apr 2014 02:31
    Reply # 1542133 on 1541810
    Deleted user
    David Tyler wrote:What's the temper of the alloy, Gary? I suspect it's T5, which is all I could buy in Oz, and that let me down, too, whereas T6 shouldn't/wouldn't have done.

    Yep, they're T5. Can't do much about it, since the batten sleeves wouldn't accept larger size. :(

    Not good news Graham. Wish you a healthy recovery!
    Last modified: 23 Apr 2014 02:33 | Deleted user
<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software