.

Converting a 40ft Offshore

  • 10 Oct 2025 04:00
    Reply # 13550977 on 13545697
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Mark, I think there might be an error here.


    Have you calculated the centre of area correctly for each of the junk sails?  doesn't look quite right. In each case, the centre of area should be on a vertical line which goes through the midpoint of the boom. (That's the quick and easy way we do it for junk sails). It doesn't matter about where it is on the sail, up or down, all that matters is the position of that vertical line. The fore-sail centre looks incorrect to me.

    I have marked the two lines (A and B) where they should be on your diagram ( but only roughly, I am eye-balling off the screen, just to show you the idea, You will need to check the accuracy.

    Now, the next thing you must do is calculate the resultant of these two centres. It looks to me as though you have just chosen the midpoint of the two, but that would be incorrect. The position on a line between the two centres is not the mid point, but a point which takes into account, in a proportional way, the AREA of each of the two sails.

    I don't know the two areas - the fore sail is smaller in area than the aft sail, I can see that, so straight away I know that the combined centre will not be at the midpoint of the two component vertical lines.


    Here's how you do it. Let us say the aft sail is 120 sq m and the fore sail is 80 sq m (just to give a simple example, with simple numbers.) Add the two areas together and we get a total of 200 sq m.  The aft sail is thus 120/200 = 3/5 of the total area. And the fore sail is thus 80/200 = 2/5 of the total area.

    Suppose the distance between those two vertical lines (representing the two centres) is 4.5m, just to use an easy number.  Then the resultant centre will need to be at a point which divides the 4.5m into proportions 3/5 and 2/5  (not half way). It will be biased towards the larger of the two areas, so it will be 2/5 of the distance from the aft centre.

    (ie 3/5 x 4.5 = 2.7) 

    and, just to check, 3/5 of the distance from the fore centre.

    (ie 2/5 x 4.5 = 1.8)

    So, the resultant line divides the 4.5 into 2.7 and 1.8    -    not half way.



    Note, I assume you have the area of the mains'l and genoa of the original rig, and have found their geometric centres correctly. It looks as though you have. But again, unless the two sails happen to have equal areas, the resultant CoE will not be midway between them, but in a position proportional to their respective areas with the bias towards the larger of the two sails, same as above. Check you have done that correctly then do your superposition of the junk rig as above.


    Forgive me if you already know all that, but it does look a bit as though your diagram might have been incorrect.

    Last modified: 10 Oct 2025 23:57 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 09 Oct 2025 23:59
    Reply # 13550944 on 13545697

    I have drawn a plan over the original sail plan and worked out the 

    CLR using a method I found on the forum . 

    Also I found information on the forum of someone using the same light poles, so apparently they are good. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. 

    1 file
  • 08 Oct 2025 00:06
    Reply # 13550059 on 13545697
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The idea looks good to me. Presumably you have the resultant geomtric centre of the sails in the correct place.

    The usual thing for a two-masted SJR seems to be to have the forward sail SJR and the aft sail contiguous (for different reasons than your's, actually, which are soon gong to be put to the test - but your reasons sound good.)

    You may also want to look at Paul's post (1st October, in the Tyvek and other building wraps for experimental sails thread) and you will see a two-masted SJR in which both sails are SJR. So far it's looking like a good combination).


    Anyway, your proposal looks good too, and it will give an excellent chance to compare the characteristics of the two types of sail, in respect to running rigging, setting and handling. I would be keen to see a report on that later.

    Also I am keen to see what Arne thinks about your proposal, as no doubt you will be too.

    I have no doubt, size of fore sail will affect the helm balance of the boat - whether helpful or not will depend on your geometric (CoE) balancing correctly with the original designed sail plan. You don't show those centres on your diagram, so no-one can comment. Make sure you have done those calculations before settling on a final sail plan, and post them for comment, or check with Arne if you haven't already done so.



    Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 00:17 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 07 Oct 2025 15:06
    Reply # 13549810 on 13545697

    Hello all.

    I'm getting a bit anxious as time is running out. 

    I only last night found Arne's paper about rigging a schooner, 

    I'm sorry I didn't find it sooner.

    I have drawn a plan using a SJR on the forward mast position , because 1/3 of the sail i forward of the mast, giving me space for the sheeting. In hindsight I could have made it bigger. Will the size help balance the boat.

    Using Arne's rig aft because it has less sail area forward. 

    Your thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated. 

    Mark 


    1 file
  • 05 Oct 2025 07:39
    Reply # 13549155 on 13545697
    Anonymous wrote:

    This is posted on behalf of Mark Shrosbree, a, old JRA member who has just rejoined:

    Hello. My name is Mark Shrosbree and I have just become the proud owner of a 40ft Offshore ,that I would like to covert to a junk rigged schooner.

    I crossed the Atlantic and have sailed 9000 miles in Cielo a 32ft junk,with a sail i built using Arne's plans off this site.

    The problem is that the placement of the masts is not really adjustable without compromising the interior . The forward mast can be placed 1.2m from the bow will have to remain where the mast is now, maybe 200mm aft of this position. Can this work?  Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

    Also,  is there a member who is knowledgeable about using street lamp poles as masts?

    No experience, but i found a aluminium street lamp poles . I begin early next month to make alterations

    Jacques 


    1 file
  • 01 Oct 2025 14:00
    Reply # 13547852 on 13545697

    Thank you. 

    I don't have any sophisticated equipment and I'm using a cell phone. 

    I hope this is what you wanted.

    The mast position at the bow would be doable at 3 or 4ft to the mast center. 

    The main where it is now, or a foot aft should also be easily done. 

    I hope this helps .

    1 file
  • 30 Sep 2025 18:42
    Reply # 13547523 on 13545697
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Mark,

    I suggest you present the forum with the sailplan. Draw in a horizontal line with the boat’s length, and do also draw in the distance from the bow to the centre of the mast position(s). Without these positions, it is next to impossible to give any qualified help

    Good luck!

    Cheers from my wheelchair,

    Arne


    Last modified: 30 Sep 2025 18:43 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 28 Sep 2025 08:34
    Reply # 13546656 on 13545697

    Well, if you can get an offset mainmast back to the middle of the LWL, then certainly a schooner rig is possible. The poles sound good, but I've never come across any with more than ¼" wall thickness. Even if they are only ¼", they will carry a 500 sq ft mainsail and a 250 sq ft foresail, so I reckon this is a viable scheme.

  • 28 Sep 2025 01:38
    Reply # 13546639 on 13545697

    Thank you kindly for your insight. 

    I really have my heart set on a schooner. 

    I was reading a post where the  mast was offset from center,

    if this is possible the main mast could come back about a meter

    and would be about 200mm from center. 

    I have the possibility of getting street lamp poles, made from 6063 T4

    With a 10" 250mm base tapered to approximately 150mm and 8 to 10mm

    Thickness.  There's also some broken poles ,that could be inserted to strengthen the bury.

    If more information is needed please let me know. 

    Thanks 

  • 26 Sep 2025 14:30
    Reply # 13546188 on 13545697

    We aren't really given enough to go on, here, but with the boat tour video on https://svonelife.com/theboat/ to help, I'd be looking at a ketch rather than a schooner, with a mizzen mast at the forward end of the stern cabin, and a mainmast somewhere between the V berths. The mizzen sail would probably be quite small, about 20% of the total area, and would act as the first one or two reefs.

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software