John wrote: The closest term that I know of that fits is batten.
Yes, I think I have to accept that. The clincher for me is that the term "batten" has been used for these spars since the late 1800s, as we know now thanks to the material you have referred us to. As Annie also points out, it's the accepted terminology within the junk rig world. I think I will continue to use the term "boomlet" on the odd occasion when it is convenient to emphasise their special function which is unique to the Chinese lug sail. The terms "yard" and "boom" need no discussion, of course.
Thanks also for your valuable links to the early junk rig derivatives in your other post: "Junk rig design and construction for trailerable boats and dinghies". You have probably seen Kevin Cardiff's article in the JRA Magazine #95 (July 2024) entitled "The Earliest Known Junks in the UK and Ireland" and it is possible there will be more following in the next issue of the magazine.
I personally think we have developed some improvements to these early rigs, but all developments owe something to what went before - and sometimes good ideas can be forgotten - we can always learn from history.
I stand by my definition of "Junk rig" as: "To be a correctly classified as a Chinese lug it must reef and hand in the unique Chinese way, and to do that there must be some form of the three basic elements: boomlets, sheetlet spans and lifts." as being the the most useful in today's world of sailing rig design, but I am sure it can be improved upon.
However, your approach, based on the early form of construction of the sail must also have merit, and resonates somewhat with Arne's approach to making a modern junk sail.
Terminology serves best as a communication tool, rather than as a subject of debate.
Thanks again for the interesting links and some fresh thinking.
PS what is the source for the second of your two attached images? (The first is obviously Worcester - the second?)
Here is an interesting one, a net fishing boat from 中国海洋渔船图集 China Offshore Fishing Atlas