Anonymous wrote:
* it has a drop keel, not a swing keel. It's about 350kg and about 2m deep when fully lowered.
So you should be able to get a reasonable idea of what the bottom profile would be like with the keel down. Good.
* the tabernacle (if I've got the terminology correct) consists of a "frame" bolted to the top of the boat into which the mast fits and is held in place with a pin. As far as I can tell there is no further support under the cabin roof for the tabernacle. If it's of any use, the mast sits immediately in front of the keel casing.
A lot of stayed masts use a part of the interior as mast support. A bulkhead or post or something so that as the standing rigging pulls the mast down there is something to push up on it as well. While it might be possible to use a stayed mast with a junk rig, it would loose a lot of it's downwind ability or require a head sail to make up for it, similar to the 42ft gazelle junk schooner. However, normally a tabernacle has a part of it go all the way down to the keel for a free standing mast that allows the junk rigged sail to go abeam or beyond. This requires the mast or tabernacle to go through the deckhead (cabin roof) and attach to the keel. The keel anchors the mast and the partners at the deckhead hold it centred and at the desired fore and aft angle (can be vertical but may slant slightly forward). You do not _have_ to use a tabernacle to have a junk rig but it does allow easier lowering the mast for transport on a trailer boat. It depends on the weight of the mast, if it is light enough you can lift it by hand to vertical and lower it through a hole to the keel, you don't need a tabernacle but really, anything bigger than a dinghy and that starts to get pretty hard.
* as far as balance goes, I'm a very new sailor, so I don't know enough to tell you how it's balanced! Sometimes I think it has weather helm ... then other times it has lee helm ... all of which is probably because we have our sails arranged very inexpertly!
I'm at the same phase. This summer is supposed to be our learning to sail it as it is summer before I start cutting holes. We've enjoyed playing with the the foresail so far, next is the main and then both together. I suspect we may end up with the same rig still next summer as I get into the planning and parts procuring phase. Or maybe we will run no poles for a season as I have seen three or four other "sailboats" doing. It would be nice to make as much use as we can through this process. It's all very easy to say I will change the rig next year but just as easy for timing to slip. I do have a trailer in the yard I want to get rid of but I am realizing it is probably long enough for long pole transport, so I guess I will keep it for a while yet. It is becoming more apparent that I will be close to solo sailing, so the simplicity of the junk rig is becoming more appealing all the time. Also, getting rid of the shrouds will mean I can even walk on deck to the bow without gymnastics (bad ones at that).
Things seem to have changed as the junk rig has progressed. It used to be that the centre of lateral resistance (CLR) was used and the centre of effort CE or Centre of area CA(more correctly) was placed about 10% of the waterline forward of the CLR. With cambered sails with more "lift" it seems that generally farther forward is recommended, in fact close to the CA of the original sail seems to be the recommendation now. This is more so with a fin keel rather than a long keel. So knowing what the stock CA of the original sail was seems to be more important that the CLR. On my boat, for example, the CA is almost 20% forward of the CLR and from what I have read, it is a well balanced sail rig as is. (several owners seem to agree anyway and I have read no accounts of poor balance)