.

Cash prize of 250 GBP - Dinghy Design Competition

  • 20 Apr 2021 20:22
    Reply # 10332360 on 10244154
    Deleted user
    Anonymous wrote:

    “Halibut Special”

    Now I got the idea to try a fully fanned 3-panel JR for Halibut, essentially the top-section of the sails I usually draw. I have found that the top section of my sails are so efficient that they deserve to be tried alone on such a little nutshell. This will give a sail of half-decent sail area, which will reef well in two stages. The running lines will just be the sheet, halyard and lazyjacks.

    The boom has been shortened to avoid sheet tangles, and the sheet goes to a boomkin long enough to sheet the reefed sail or bundle to the centreline.

    The procedure of stowing the sail should sound like this:

    • 1.      Let go the halyard to dump the sail into its lazyjacks.
    • 2.      Haul on the running lazyjacks to raise the sail bundle and pin it to the mast. Longish batten parrels make this possible. Cleat the tail of the lazy j. at the mast.
    • 3.      Bring the sheet inboard,  reeve it around the sail bundle and cleat it off on the mast.
    • 4.      Unstep and lower the mast.
    • 5.      The boomkin may be taken in at leisure.

    With a little practice, this should be doable within 60 seconds, which is the maximum I would tolerate.
    One may well row the boat with the mast erected and the sheet in place. When clear of the beech, the lazyjacks are cast off, the sail hoisted and then one is under way (.depending a bit of wind direction and choice of leeboard and rudder/steering oar...).

    I kind of like this rig.

    Arne



    Hello, Arne.

    I've been enthusiastically following this thread because it satisfies most of my more important requirements for a potential sailboat. I have a few questions, though, and a possible suggestion.

    Bear with me; I've never sailed anything, and sailing craft are still a bit mysterious to me, so my thinking may be way off. Anyway ...

    Regarding your point #2 above, it seems to me that the batten parrels would have to be absurdly long if the objective is to have them folded up parallel with the mast. My first inclination was to have one end of them detachable (an extra bit of work), but maybe you're not thinking of the whole package being a cylindrical roll (which would be nice). A narrow fan-fold, maybe? Also, would excessively long batten parrels give the sail assembly too much freedom of movement?

    Then it seems to me that if you could arrange for the mast to fold over, at some point above the shear line, all the other rigging could be just tidied up a bit but otherwise left in place. This would be the ultimate selling point for me: at the end of an excursion, I could reef and fold up the sail, fold the mast down, hang a flag on the end of it and load it into the bed of my pickup and drive off; no separate parts to handle. This is why I use a plastic kayak: shove it in the truck, strap it down, and go. If it becomes too much work, I wouldn't do it, which is partly why I haven't yet built a sailboat or considered buying one.

    Finally, in this particular configuration it makes me wonder if the boat would be underpowered. Its sail area is only 25+ square feet, and I know that PDRs typically carry over twice that. Maybe Halibut's hull shape makes up for that somewhat? I can't envision a way to substantially increase the sail area without doing something drastic, but I'd like to hear some thoughts on using a biplane rig.

    Last modified: 20 Apr 2021 20:25 | Deleted user
  • 20 Apr 2021 07:43
    Reply # 10330465 on 10211344
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    That's what I meant.

    I wasn't suggesting chine runners, I was suggesting the mini-bilge keels which David Th's boat has.


    Addition: the guy who wrote that article David T refers to has over-promoted chine runners in the past, in my opinion, and I would not take it too seriously. in fact, apart from the Paradox and its little sister, not much is known about the concept, which may well be in the "too good to be true" category.

    I would not suggest chine runners (see HFJY34 thread)- my previous post was merely to ask what David and Arne and others think about the "bilge runners", or "little bilge keels" if you will,  which David has found successful on his new catamaran. I was wondering if they would present noticeable drag when rowing.

    Last modified: 20 Apr 2021 09:05 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 20 Apr 2021 07:37
    Reply # 10330463 on 10329746
    Graeme wrote:

    Would something like this, on Halibut or the mini-SIBLIM  be worth a try?

    This is David Th's bilge runner (see HFJY34 thread)

    It doesn't take all that much to get a dinghy to go to windward.

    For a SibLim 2.3m, that is principally a rowing tender that's occasionally sailed - yes, that's worth considering.

    For a SibLim 4m, that is principally a sailing boat for junkets and open boat cruising - I'm not so sure. It seems that chine runners work on boats of a certain type and with certain proportions - long, narrow and deep, with a rectangular midship section. David's are really mini bilge keels, which are a different thing and need to be designed differently. 

  • 20 Apr 2021 07:26
    Reply # 10330457 on 10211344
    Arne wrote:

    PS 19.4.2021

    I will complete the plans for Halibut in due course, but I will not bother with participating in the design competition. Spring is here, and it’s time to make my Ingeborg ready for sailing. I’ve received the first Covid vaccine shot, so I will rather focus on ‘real life’ again. Designing dinghies was well and fine during the lock-down, but is off less interest now. Besides, I am reluctant to compete with an untried boat.
    I wish you good luck with your entries.

    A.

    I'm of a similar view. I'm into my countdown to go cruising at the end of the month, and busy with antifouling and storing up. Maybe when I return at the end of summer, I'll do more on the SibLim 4m as a Junket boat, because that's the real need, not a sub-8ft tender, and it's the only way that I'm going to get a SibLim of my very own. Like Arne, I wouldn't want others to think of building something that I hadn't at least modelled at reduced size myself, and I don't think it was a good scheme to make this a competition anyway.

    Last modified: 20 Apr 2021 07:38 | Anonymous member
  • 20 Apr 2021 00:43
    Reply # 10329746 on 10211344
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Would something like this, on Halibut or the mini-SIBLIM  be worth a try?

    This is David Th's bilge runner (see HFJY34 thread)

    It doesn't take all that much to get a dinghy to go to windward.

    Last modified: 20 Apr 2021 05:30 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 11 Apr 2021 23:06
    Reply # 10300147 on 10211344
    Deleted user

    There are countless dinghy designs out there.... I'm sure there are improvements to be made, but the most important outcome here is a compelling and simple junk rig template for a dinghy, and Arne's Halibut JR seems to be that.  The instant reefing, and the ability to braille it to the mast for removal makes for a nice package. 

    I look at that truncated bottom panel, and I ask myself if perhaps the next level so to speak would be to make the bottom panel triangular by ending the luff at the forward end of the second batten, and lengthening the foot of the sail while eliminating the boom altogether.  The lazy jacks would attach to the end of the second batten, and each panel would be 2M to the side.   The first two reefs would be normal junk rig reefs into the lazy jacks, and the third would be fathering the bottom panel and tying it to the bundle.   This would put the reefed sail above a rower's head.  The second batten would be the boom.   A "loose footed junk rig".  


         At age 12, I instigated the building of 14 skin on frame canoes in the school shop when I bought a Trailcraft 17' canoe kit and asked to build it in school shop.  We duplicated all the pieces and built 14 of them that year.  Our "canoe factory" made the newspaper.   I'd love to see something similar with junk rigged dinghies, but I think 8' is a bit on the small size for sailing fun.   It's  more than possible to build a simple sailing dinghy 10' long and keep the basic weight down to around 50 lbs.   Make it simple, sexy, and inexpensive to build. Every kid's dream is to sail off to that far wooded point in the distance, that small island, the other side of the lake where nobody else goes, and explore isn't it ;-)


  • 09 Apr 2021 11:56
    Reply # 10290636 on 10211344
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Deviding the JRA dinghy project into two steps.

    Now it looks to me that the discussion around the 2.4m JRA dinghy has completed a full circle. I and others started with suggesting rowing-only tenders. I then added a dead simple downwind sail, but with no board or rudder planned for it. Then came the junk rig demand, and the 3-panel sail for Halibut was introduced. At the same time, the lines of Halibut were adjusted for better stability. After many words written around the bow-board, leeboards, fixed keel and, finally, the usefulness of a rig at all, we are now back on the rowing tender.

    Here is what I will do:
    Step One:
    I will present the Halibut design with the cb. slot fitted from Day One. I will then suggest that you build it with the slot in (easier during building than retrofitting it), and then go rowing in it.

    Step Two:
    If the desire arises for sailing Halibut, the rig, rudder and bow-board can be constructed and fitted to complete the project.

    Arne

    PS 19.4.2021
    I will complete the plans for Halibut in due course, but I will not bother with participating in the design competition. Spring is here, and it’s time to make my Ingeborg ready for sailing. I’ve received the first Covid vaccine shot, so I will rather focus on ‘real life’ again. Designing dinghies was well and fine during the lock-down, but is off less interest now. Besides, I am reluctant to compete with an untried boat.
    I wish you good luck with your entries.

    A.


    Last modified: 19 Apr 2021 10:18 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 09 Apr 2021 09:15
    Reply # 10290141 on 10211344
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    No David, I expressed that poorly. Not talking about skin on frame (I've never even seen one) or super light weight. By referring to Annie's dinghy I was more referring to its "niceness" in relation to being dragged on its skegs.

    A JRA dinghy such as Arne's Halibut should be easy to carry that way. 8' is about the limit, unless you are tall. You stand it on its transom, snuggle the small of your back into the thwart, reach up with your hands to the forward thwart - and lean forward/straighten your legs, and you can waddle along no problem. The weight is not much of a problem and its easy to put down. Its more a question of your reach. Easier than trying to get a miniature curragh  onto your back, I should think, although I've never seen one of them either. I'm only average strength - less these days.

    Last modified: 09 Apr 2021 09:41 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 09 Apr 2021 08:45
    Reply # 10290094 on 10211344
    (If it were lightly and nicely built, like Annie’s FanTan, I think I would rather carry it on my back like a turtle, which is easy and often done here.)

    We're straying into "The Ideal Tender" territory here, rather than "JRA tender designed to sail under JR" territory. But yes, a dinghy that weighs the bare minimum is best carried coracle- or curragh-fashion, on the back. When I had a miniature curragh, 2.65m long x 1m beam, I could very easily swing it up onto my back by grasping the thole pins. A skin-on-frame boat makes a very satisfactory lightweight rowing or paddling tender, but perhaps not a sailing tender.


  • 09 Apr 2021 08:29
    Reply # 10290055 on 10211344
    We have to ask why a tender should be sailed at all. In my experience it is mainly for fun, will take place mainly in the sheltered waters of an anchorage, often involving children, and where  I live, almost certainly off a gently shelving beach.

    Indeed we do have to ask. It's not because sailing is the best way of propelling a yacht's tender when it is acting in its main role of conveying crew and stores between mothership and shore. Rowing a dinghy is better for moving a heavy load to windward, and paddling a kayak is better for making a lot of distance to windward. That being so, I tend to agree with the concept of providing a tender with means for sailing to and fro across the wind for fun in the manner of a sailboard, which generally only has skegs. Twin skegs on a tender would seem to answer well enough. 

    Samuel Johnson wasn't a small boat sailor, but if he had been, he might have chosen a different simile here:

    Boswell: I told him I had been that morning at a meeting of the people called Quakers, where I had heard a woman preach.  Johnson: "Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all."
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software