RE adding JR Vocab to Wikipedea:
I'm hesitant about this. Wikipedea has its own standards and criteria for entries, many of which are designed to exclude special interests. JRA does have special interests, which may conflict, at least to some degree.
For example, one of the JRA purposes for the Vocabulary is to establish standard terms. This would be a goal incompatible with Wikipedea neutrality guidelines.
What I'd suggest is creating our own Vocabulary (and/or other resources) and adding a link on the Wikipedea article under 'external links'. This maintains our freedom to tailor it to our perspective and needs, while making it available to the public through that portal.
The Vocabulary could then be in any web accessible format, including wiki.
RE wiki environment for document development:
Again, I'm impressed by the approach and its results.
The theory is that, as any authorized member can (reversibly) modify the collaborative document at any time, a form of natural selection improves the document in step-wise fashion.
What amounts to a forum is associated with each document for discussion, and the history of revisions is always available for back-tracking. Thus editorial corrections, wording improvements, expansions and additions can (at best) be made by members whenever a problem is noted, without further oversight.
In practice, an editor (or group) is likely a good idea, to step in and arbitrate when spirited counter-edits get going. This is something that can occur in communities whose members espouse strong opinions. 8)
RE my involvement:
I'd be happy to collate the Vocab document, and add in any additions through March 2014. I'll need an administrator to work with me a bit via email, to get me up to speed (Would that be you, Brian? Or Lesley?).
Once a JRA wiki environment has been set up (I can't do that due to poor connectivity) - assuming that's the direction taken - I can transfer it from it's present form into a wiki, so long as it's within that same timeframe.
Dave Z