Excessive Electronic Media Exposure

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 29 Jan 2018 19:31
    Reply # 5707743 on 5681480
    Deleted user

    Hi Martin. I I'm pleased that sites like Facebook, Twitter etc are coming in for so much criticism and investigation these days. They have their uses, sure, but some of them are becoming too big for their boots. Its only through their support and use by so many billions of people that they make so much money and wield so much influence. There's a lot of research now showing how bad it is to be too hooked on such social networks. Only today in the 'i' newspaper there was a fascinating article about how many young people of 15-25 prefer chatting with 'friends' online than face to face, avoiding the latter like the plague.

  • 16 Jan 2018 18:51
    Reply # 5685984 on 5681480
    Deleted user

    Well Annie and everybody, I never thought I would create such interest so thank you for all your comments. It's so reassuring to know that I'm not the only grumpy old man or woman. I think I have caught up with the idea that there is "an off switch", e.g. very useful to use the mute button when "watching the tele", a little more testing though when wading through "print "media .

      So it seems the big social media companies are not the most popular corporate beings at the moment and it is nice to be comfortably, but not too comfortably, anonymous on the internet.

    Rodney.

  • 15 Jan 2018 19:46
    Reply # 5684275 on 5681480
    Deleted user

    I’m glad to see that some of us don’t like or use Facebook. One channel of communication works best for me, life’s too short to dedicate too many hours to tablets and mobile phones. I take David’s point about arrivals and departures, but we have the Cruisers Forum for that. Shame it hardly ever gets used these days.

    Last modified: 15 Jan 2018 19:47 | Deleted user
  • 14 Jan 2018 14:49
    Reply # 5682153 on 5681480

    "each to their own" is part of the equation. The other part is that different platforms work well for one thing, but not necessarily well for another. For me, Facebook works best for social chat with family and friends. In the OCC,  and also for us, I believe, it works best for social chat and announcements of arrivals and departures, and for sharing snippets of news that are of interest to sailors. Measured debating of weightier topics works better on the fora. I'm glad that we established, early on, a tone of friendly, civilised and useful debate here. I dropped in on another FB sailing group recently, found that there was too much pointless chat from "keyboard sailors" for my liking, and soon dropped out. Each to their own.

  • 13 Jan 2018 23:56
    Reply # 5681708 on 5681480

    Rodney - it's not mandatory, you know. ;-)  There's also a junk rig group on Yahoo.  If you already have a Facebook account, I guess you can join or follow the Facebook group.  If you haven't, you won't.  The little bit I've seen of Facebook is enough to put me off - even following the latest postings seems disorganised - so I don't have an account.  Nor do I visit the yahoo group.  As you say, this website is enough for many of us.

    I guess I'm a grumpy old woman.

  • 13 Jan 2018 23:41
    Reply # 5681685 on 5681480

    Some of us junkies are just insatiable!  And perhaps it casts the net a bit wider, for those who are not JRA members.  Some of these non-members may even be encouraged to join us.

  • 13 Jan 2018 20:27
    Reply # 5681518 on 5681480
    Anonymous

    Rodney

    Many of your fellow 'grumpy old men', as well as their more enthusiastic counterparts, have commented on the development of this group here and here.

    Not being a Facebook user myself I was not filled with enthusiasm at the suggestion, but I believe it has proven its worth as an alternative to a conventional website such as this one in bringing together enthusiasts and encouraging discussion of all things junk.

    Chris

  • 13 Jan 2018 19:15
    Message # 5681480
    Deleted user

    I have just discovered that there is an "International Facebook Junk Rig group". Why are not we satisfied with the JRA website? Why should we have to wade through yet more elelectronic media diarrhoea? How many apps does one have to post on or read to have adequate/excessive media exposure? I feel the JRA site covers all the things that Facebook, Twitter and etc do without the commerciality of advertisements etc. How restful.

    Over the years I have so much enjoyed the humour (unrivalled) and technical expertise and knowledge published on this site that I do not understand the need for yet more exposure. I feel very cosy on the JRA website. I suppose it's a question of "each to their own" or am I just becoming a grumpy old man?

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software