.

Harvest - 56' Aluminium Conversion

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 18 Oct 2025 10:15
    Reply # 13553572 on 13551368
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    David T has some good points.

    Frankly, my pottering about in protected or half-protected waters tells nothing about how it will work offshore.

    However, many others have made long voyages with cambered panel sails. Alan in Zebedee did it both under flat sails and cambered ones, and I never heard any regrets from him. In addition, Pete Hill and Linda C.-G. in Kokachin did the big Atlantic tour, and it appears that Kokachin's windward performance was good indeed, and handling of the sails offshore was not  that hard either.

    I may have been jabbering too much about windward performance. The cambered junk rig also adds a lot more brute power when pointing at any angle from a broadish to a close reach.  That video clip of Ingeborg on a beam-to-broad reach tells a lot:

    IF Ingeborg

    The wind here is only 10knots, or 12 at most. There is no way Ingeborg would have jogged along at 6-6.5kts under a flat sail.

    Another reminder: In Stavanger there was for over 20 years the 49ft, 25ton (70+37sqm) Samson, with a long keel and fixed 3-blade propeller. That vessel sailed smartly, even in lightish winds. If you bother with reading Slieve McGalliard’s report from the Stavanger rally in 2004 (Magazine Jan 2005), you will see for yourselves.

    Cheers from the Wheelchair Admiral
    (.. hopefully on crutches from next week…),

    Arne


    Last modified: 18 Oct 2025 15:55 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 17 Oct 2025 16:13
    Reply # 13553337 on 13551368

    Just a little more, to address the "robustness" issue: I think it's self-evident that a sail intended for 500 miles per annum inshore need not be so robustly built as a sail intended for the 10,000 miles per annum of a 3 year circumnavigation. But really, the amount of camber, or the lack of it, is irrelevant. A well made sail is a well made sail whatever its 2D or 3D geometry.

  • 17 Oct 2025 12:35
    Reply # 13553249 on 13551368

    I would agree with David Tyler's assessment, and it certainly is what I took as given in my comments about flat-cut sails - that their disadvantages are less significant when sailing offshore, especially if one is sailing predominantly in tradewind routes, or aboard heavy, beamy, long-keeled yachts, as I do.  Given my experience, first with a cambered sail, then with a flat-cut one on Arion, I am keenly aware of the loss of performance when I switched to the flat-cut sail, when I was inshore.  I only did it because I could not find a sailmaker in Sydney willing to make me a cambered junk sail.  I only found ONE sailmaker willing to make me a flat-cut sail!  Arion was not a windward flyer in open water, due to the heavy, beamy hull, and the cambered sail did not make a lot of difference once there were developed wind waves well forward of the beam in open waters.

    Nonetheless, I will be fitting a cambered sail on Arion II when I convert in a year or so, despite the boat being in the heavy-displacement, long-keeled category, because I enjoy sailing smartly when inshore, plus, if the cambered sail is set up correctly, I find it offers no disadvantage offshore.

    Nonetheless, people like Shirley Carter continue to demonstrate that flat-cut sails are good enough for open-ended cruising (where you don't have a schedule), if you have a laid-back enough mindset!  I still think Kurt jon Ulmer of mehitabel fame, has a point!

    Last modified: 17 Oct 2025 12:36 | Anonymous member
  • 16 Oct 2025 22:47
    Reply # 13553110 on 13552097
    Arne wrote:

    FLAT?

    For some reason, over the years, this ‘truth’ has established itself that flat junksails are better suited for offshore or long distance sailing than those with cambered panels. Somehow they are being regarded as more robust. I don’t buy this truth.

    I don't think that's correct, Arne. I would put it that flat sails are at less of a disadvantage offshore, and particularly for the sort of downwind or reaching passages that most of us who aimed at comfortable long distance cruising would hope for. But not that they're better. Indeed, when I think of the passages that I made going from New Zealand to Alaska, with a lot of upwind work, I'd not have enjoyed it with a flat sail. Anyone doing the Jester Challenge, or any similar transatlantic race, had better have a good windward rig as well. Put simply, flat sails are less good but it doesn't matter so much, when most of the miles are offshore and cruising downwind.  

    [edit] And also, that flat sails are less troublesome and less labour intensive to set well on a long passage, when the amount of energy expended by the crew matters more than it does on a short day sail.   

    Last modified: 17 Oct 2025 09:27 | Anonymous member
  • 16 Oct 2025 22:03
    Reply # 13553086 on 13551368

    Thank you Arne, one day when we need to refresh the reg I may get cambered sails however for now since these were done prior to my takeover of the project I will just have to make do. 

    I noticed the flag in the video. Great demonstration by the way, very neat. Our first big trip will be up towards your direction from Cardiff to Copenhagen in August. I am sure those North Westerly Winds will put those sails to a good test (not that I will ever intend to catch them). 

  • 14 Oct 2025 13:34
    Reply # 13552097 on 13551368
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    FLAT?

    For some reason, over the years, this ‘truth’ has established itself that flat junksails are better suited for offshore or long distance sailing than those with cambered panels. Somehow they are being regarded as more robust. I don’t by this truth.

    My very first, professionally made junksail, was flat. Although it was big, at 32sqm on a 1400kg boat, that sail turned my Malena into a lame duck at any winds before the beam.

    Moreover, several panels tended to flutter at the leech and ‘buckle’ at the luff of a couple of panels. This fluttering is no good in the long run if one plans for sailing into the blue.

    (One quick fix could be to stitch on a stout boltrope along the luff and leech, made from rope or webbing).

    Over to the sails with cambered panels:

    Apart from the big improvement in performance, these sails have also proved to be very quiet. The luff and leech stand taut and almost never flutter. This is most visible on the lightly cambered top panels. These panels set beautifully with no hint of fluttering leech. Even the slack, baggy panels behave themselves when the sail is being luffed, as on this little clip.

    IF Ingeborg

    The only real drawback with the cambered panel sail is that it takes a bit brainwork to figure out how to shape each batten panel to achieve the desired camber.

    Sooo, next time, Dara…

    Anyway,

    Good luck!

    Arne


    Last modified: 14 Oct 2025 15:48 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 14 Oct 2025 12:16
    Reply # 13552076 on 13551814
    Dara wrote:
    Grahamwrote:

    I'd say they were flat-cut.  Given the displacement of the boat and the relatively small sail area (It feels weird to say that about an 80 sq m mainsail, but it is a very big vessel!), I think it will need to motorsail to windward in winds under 15-20 knots, so the flat-cut sails won't be too much of a disadvantage, and will be quite adequate from a close reach to a broad reach.  I look forward to seeing and hearing more about this boat's sailing trials.  It looks like a comfortable ocean cruiser!


    Graham, you are spot on. The battens are made from fibreglass and stretch out the sail. It was designed as a flat cut sail. 

    We will have to see how she performs in a few weeks when we do the first sea trial. On the one hand, this boat is primarily made and being refitted for long distance cruising rather than racing. Due to the size and weight it will never catch enough air with this Sq m of sail to gain impressive speeds, and we will likely need to use the engine if sailing close to windward or in light breezes. 

    On the other hand, the total sail area is the same as the original Bermudan rig with the main and genoa as far as I understand so it may perform better than expected. Harvest is an interesting underwater shape with a good balance between performance and comfort. On the motor, it feels like handling a boat much smaller in size. 


    I think she will make a fine bluewater cruiser, where it usually is not profitable sail closer to the wind than 60°, not if your boat is of moderately-heavy displacement, no matter what the rig.  If the sail area is around the same as the bermudan original, you can expect good performance off the wind, probably better than you would with a bermudan rig.  I have converted a boat from bermudan rig before and that was my experience.
  • 13 Oct 2025 15:38
    Reply # 13551814 on 13551577
    Anonymous wrote:
    Anonymous wrote:

    Just out of curiosity: are (or will be) the sails cambered?

    I'd say they were flat-cut.  Given the displacement of the boat and the relatively small sail area (It feels weird to say that about an 80 sq m mainsail, but it is a very big vessel!), I think it will need to motorsail to windward in winds under 15-20 knots, so the flat-cut sails won't be too much of a disadvantage, and will be quite adequate from a close reach to a broad reach.  I look forward to seeing and hearing more about this boat's sailing trials.  It looks like a comfortable ocean cruiser!


    Graham, you are spot on. The battens are made from fibreglass and stretch out the sail. It was designed as a flat cut sail. 

    We will have to see how she performs in a few weeks when we do the first sea trial. On the one hand, this boat is primarily made and being refitted for long distance cruising rather than racing. Due to the size and weight it will never catch enough air with this Sq m of sail to gain impressive speeds, and we will likely need to use the engine if sailing close to windward or in light breezes. 

    On the other hand, the total sail area is the same as the original Bermudan rig with the main and genoa as far as I understand so it may perform better than expected. Harvest is an interesting underwater shape with a good balance between performance and comfort. On the motor, it feels like handling a boat much smaller in size. 


  • 12 Oct 2025 20:35
    Reply # 13551650 on 13551368

    That's true. A big ship.

  • 12 Oct 2025 14:24
    Reply # 13551577 on 13551559
    Anonymous wrote:

    Just out of curiosity: are (or will be) the sails cambered?

    I'd say they were flat-cut.  Given the displacement of the boat and the relatively small sail area (It feels weird to say that about an 80 sq m mainsail, but it is a very big vessel!), I think it will need to motorsail to windward in winds under 15-20 knots, so the flat-cut sails won't be too much of a disadvantage, and will be quite adequate from a close reach to a broad reach.  I look forward to seeing and hearing more about this boat's sailing trials.  It looks like a comfortable ocean cruiser!
<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software