Minimalistic cruising multihulls

  • 05 Dec 2018 21:05
    Reply # 6947470 on 6886625
    Deleted user

    Going with the idea of using a wishbone boom and luff spar rig on a free standing mast (as above) on a Kohler Eco 6,  does strike me as a possibility.

    Structural changes to accomodate the mast, might include changing out the daggerboard for a kick-up board on the centre line, and still save most of the accomodation space and layout.

    Only a cursory look at at the Eco 6 material (available on the net) has led to this thinking, but as an alternative to stepping twin masts, I think it would be worth pursuing in depth, because  both the daggerboard's vulnerability to strike damage ( unless a foam packed collision box is included) and the space robbing twin masts are asking for improvement.

    Last modified: 05 Dec 2018 21:10 | Deleted user
  • 04 Dec 2018 04:35
    Reply # 6944438 on 6943895
    Deleted user
    Jeremy Walker wrote:

    Drawing is representative of a 16 footer  rather than the 12 f'ter spoken about before, and an extra sail panel has been added along with the extra length.

    Headsail on opposite tack to the main is to prevent obscuring of some lines, and other drawn lines are compromised to avoid clutter.

    Detail is lacking because of scale reduction, so gear (eg steering) is hard to portray, as too, are rigging lines and structural members that need to be added to the wishbone boom.


    I like the concept of this, being someone who would love to find an alternative to the bermudan rig on the little 6 meter catamaran I am building, and having decided that a conventional junk rig probably is not going to work out.
    Last modified: 04 Dec 2018 05:55 | Deleted user
  • 03 Dec 2018 21:43
    Reply # 6944004 on 6886625

    Thanks for sharing, Jeremy.  I see your artistic skills are still well-honed. Looks like a fascinating project.  Many of us will be watching closely and looking forward to the details in due course.

  • 03 Dec 2018 20:22
    Reply # 6943895 on 6886625
    Deleted user

    Body txt is required for posting, so assuming this is included with the pic, here goes.

    Drawing is representative of a 16 footer  rather than the 12 f'ter spoken about before, and an extra sail panel has been added along with the extra length.

    Headsail on opposite tack to the main is to prevent obscuring of some lines, and other drawn lines are compromised to avoid clutter.

    Detail is lacking because of scale reduction, so gear (eg steering) is hard to portray, as too, are rigging lines and structural members that need to be added to the wishbone boom.

    Sorry if this is a meagre showing, but I have warned that anything more meaningful will have to be a 3D structure.

    1 file
    Last modified: 03 Dec 2018 20:32 | Deleted user
  • 03 Dec 2018 11:25
    Reply # 6942940 on 6886625

    Jeremy,

    Once you've hit 'reply' or 'quote', you should see at the bottom: 'Attachments' and a box to click on: 'Choose files'. Then you can highlight the file in your computer and click on 'open'. That will put a thumbnail image at the bottom of your posting. Write your text, and 'post'.

    1 file
  • 03 Dec 2018 09:18
    Reply # 6942827 on 6886625
    Deleted user

    In order to oblige request for  clarification of the wingsail proa rig I have been on about, a a sketch has been done (which I have in jpeg format), so with helpful directions, I should be able to post it here..... thanks to whoever may hopefully explain the image posting process.  

    In advance, I warn that the scale and eligibility is not wonderful, because  the best way to get it done asap, was to do a pen sketch on A4 paper and ask my wife to snap an iPhone pic, that was mailed to my laptop for filing.

    Once I can see the image on forum, additional written info can be added to explain a few things re  intentional distortion drawn in an attempt toward clarification.

  • 01 Dec 2018 08:38
    Reply # 6940905 on 6940618
    Jeremy wrote:

    This is where the design is different to other junk and wingsails that I have seen, and is different to the Tystie rig, even if David's rig has a rotating masthead/crane and halyard on a bearing.

    Help from David's work was in the way he explains how both the upper and lower first 10% chord distance of the wing's leading edge must hold a convex shape, in order to direct flow around to the upper surface.

    His use of wishbones and 'riblets' to give the cloth shape, was helpful in that I can modify and hopefully lighten this system, to work with my wishbone boom, luffspar and yard, to make the whole wing rotate, including halyards and downhauls.

    Jeremy,

    I've never used anything but fixed masthead blocks for the halyard.

    May we see some sketches of what you're proposing to make?

    In case it helps, here is a photo of the wingsail components that I've made. On the left ,the forward ends of the battens, to joggle around the mast, keeping the mast on the centreline, weight 220 gms, cross section 26 x 13mm, compression moulded in alternate layers of kevlar flat braid and 25mm carbon tape. On the right, the luff formers, to be put into pockets in the sail, two or three per panel, weight 24gms, cross section 10 x 4mm, compression moulded in kevlar flat braid.

    1 file
  • 01 Dec 2018 00:33
    Reply # 6940618 on 6935613
    Deleted user
    Anonymous wrote:
    Jeremy Walker wrote:

    Instead of having a rotating mast, I will go with a junk mast( fixed/unstayed), with the sail rotating, and meaning that there  needs to be a collar and a rotating pin rail on the mast.

    While working on some basic drawings, I would like to go back and have another glance at David's (Tyler0 JRA piece on development of his wing and hinged battens....... somehow I just cannot find it again.Can anyone help point out where it is on the site?
    If you go to the members area and type in David Tyler Wingsails and their battens, you will come up with David's thread, called Wingsails and their battens, about working on his project in Canada.  It is in the Wingsails Forum.  You could also use the same search tool for other threads on hinged battens that should be in the Technical Forum.

    The issue with using fixed masts on a standard junk-rigged shunting proa (not sure about your rig variations) is that the sail is on one side of the mast when going to windward on one shunt, and on the other when you change bows.  Where to attach the halyard at the truck is the biggest issue I have not yet resolved.  On a tacking boat, it works best on the aft side of the mast, offset to the same side the sail is rigged, on a masthead crane that is 30 degrees off centre.  The halyard, yard hauling parrel and luff hauling parrel come down on the opposite side, sometimes called the chimney, where the sail never goes.

    This obviously won't work for us.  The closest I have come to a solution so far is to rig the sail on the opposite side of the mast to the ama.  If you are standing at the bow of the main hull when the ama is to your right, looking back at the mast, and the luff of the sail is closest to you, the crane would be pointing towards you (port and starboard have no meaning here!), or possibly even slightly offset to your left.  Need to make a model to determine where it will have the least twist on both shunts.  The chimney that the halyard and running parrel tails use is behind the mast from this perspective.  That is where the sail never goes.  When you shunt, the sail rotates around the side of the mast that is closest to you.

    There is some unavoidable twist in the halyard, but if you design it with lots of drift when fully hoisted, I think it might work.

    I'll be very interested to see what you come up with.

    Also, I have been reading a lot about the sailing of proa Madness, and it seems the boat sails perfectly well with just its mainsail.  The jib acts like a turbo charger.  So I can see no reason why you cannot use a single junk rig, with a balance of 10-20%, with the masty amidships.  You could have a drifter for very light winds but I wouldn't bother.  You won't get the blistering performance of Jzerro or Madness but I don't want it.  A maximum of 8-10 knots would suit me fine.  Madness and Jzerro have the daggerboard amidships in the ama.  This will work obviously even with just one sail, but I am tempted by the idea of tandem daggerboards in the ama, with a space of perhaps 1.5m between them.  Having sailed across the Pacific with tandem daggerboards, I know how easy it is to adjust balance with them.  And you have a spare to bring you home if you break one!

    Got you Graham, the fixed mast and rotating crane issue had been sorted(on paper) before mentioning the rig design here.


    Normally I work things out on paper, and when I can construct something in a series of sketches, then I can begin sourcing materials and start building the thing in small scale).
    Only then is it worth showing how it looks and functions, because snags will have been sorted, by then.

    Sure, the masthead/crane and chimney need to rotate, along with the boom and battens, while the mast is fixed.

    This is where the design is different to other junk and wingsails that I have seen, and is different to the Tystie rig, even if David's rig has a rotating masthead/crane and halyard on a bearing.

    Help from David's work was in the way he explains how both the upper and lower first 10% chord distance of the wing's leading edge must hold a convex shape, in order to direct flow around to the upper surface.

    His use of wishbones and 'riblets' to give the cloth shape, was helpful in that I can modify and hopefully lighten this system, to work with my wishbone boom, luffspar and yard, to make the whole wing rotate, including halyards and downhauls.

    It may sound like a very big ask, but looks like a goer. (on paper)

    Main concern as I see it, is whether the rig can be built light and strong enough, without going the all carbon composite route, and to find this out, a dinghy size build is the only way to show.

    Doing  an archive search, like you suggest, brings up some stuff going backbite a few years, when there were people taking up the harryproa idea of rotating unstayed rigs, but the use of boards manipulated to provide lateral. area balancing of effort centre and vector is the way that appeals me as well.

    Having shifting sails is the old way that was used on the split rig Pahi, which does free up hull space for accommodation, if external drop or swing down boards can be used as well.

    WWhat. appeals to me  about a modified Pahi configuration is that both mast and boards can be external to the accomodation space.


    Last modified: 01 Dec 2018 01:12 | Deleted user
  • 29 Nov 2018 11:23
    Reply # 6937761 on 6886625
    Deleted user

    Thanks guys, I should have replied sooner, but was having a silly log in glitch, which is now sorted ( thanks to my wife who has a handle on the various email addresses used).

    As well, there has been a weather window for painting the Pahi, which has kept me away from a laptop for a couple of days.

    David's piece on Tystie's wingsail was  in 'documents under 'technical articles, and I probably should not have described battens as being 'hinged', instead they have a  hinge- like pivot at the after end of a wishbone , and are wingsails in his case. 

    So maybe describing my design aa a junk sail could understandably be confusing. However,i I do include a yard, which could be set to one side of the mast (junk like) if not centred like a Gunter.

    It works on paper, and no doubt tweaking will be needed when built in solid material.

    Sail area relative to the mast and CLR is not critical, when boards can be used to shift lateral area....as you are saying Graham.

    As configured( with the Pahi iti design) I have opted for swing down/up foils( dropped to move lateral area aft and varied at direction change),making balanced sail area forward of the mast  helpful rather than indispensable.

     Still, this design allows for a triangular sail before the mast, which at least covers the need for a storm jib.

    Spending time  on design is only justified if I am going to build the thing, so scale is as followes --

    Chief consideration is how to build for body fit, in that I must be able to get on and into the proa...... there is no point in building a model to see where the strings go., because I have to first build a mock-up, and might as well make a stitch and glue V  section hull out of plywood.

    Seating on a platform will be the first step towards a hulls connecting structure, and a mock-up rig could then be set-up outside the garage workspace.

    The longer lee hull is pretty much all that is then needed to get afloat and start with seating and footbraces for rowing..

    David, thanks for that lead on the windsail thread.

    More time needs to be spent on theory re the leading edge shape, at the same time there are critical factors relating to geometry in order to rotate for shunting, which could call for compromise.

     

    Last modified: 29 Nov 2018 11:50 | Deleted user
  • 29 Nov 2018 08:21
    Reply # 6937654 on 6936040
    David wrote:
    Jeremy wrote:While working on some basic drawings, I would like to go back and have another glance at David's (Tyler) JRA piece on development of his wing and hinged battens....... somehow I just cannot find it again.Can anyone help point out where it is on the site?



    For a good guide on how not to do it!

    If I can get clear of my current projects by the spring, I'll be having another go at this. I have the moulded components ready, have made a start on the sail and have bought the batten tubes.

    Also JRA magazine issue 66, p 44.
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software