Outboard engines. Merits, problems and suggestions.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 11 Oct 2016 04:54
    Reply # 4299737 on 4299689
    Deleted user
    Darren Bos wrote:
    ...with two cycle engines where the volatile stuff evaporates from the carb over the winter and leaves a goo or varnish that prevents things from working properly in the spring.  
    Gosh, Darren, that takes me back... We used to fly aircraft with 2 stroke engines, and getting rid of that varnish meant dissembling matched pairs of complex, constant vacuum carburetors and an overnight dip in an ultrasonic cleaning bath (for the carburetors, that is). 

    One trick we did was flood the engine to shut it down at the end of the day, by pulling the choke on full. The idea was to get a rich blast of fuel into cylinders, with the idea that a little extra oil would be left to help guard against corrosion (on piston ported engines, an open port allows condensation to occur inside the cooling cylinders). I don't imagine it would hurt a 2 stroke outboard to do likewise.

    Most probably know that a dash of vinegar at engine flush time helps keep the salts from depositing and leaves your engine reminiscing of fresh summer garden salads.

  • 11 Oct 2016 03:43
    Reply # 4299689 on 4299341
    Deleted user
    Arne Kverneland wrote:
    My “winter preservation procedure” was just to start and run it for a few minutes, 2-3 times during winter. If the temp was below zero, it could feel a little stiff and reluctant. Then I fitted a nice long extension line to the starter cord and pulled the engine over the top as many as 10 -15 times.  After this treatment it would usually start at first (2-handed) yank.

    Arne

    After many hours of spring maintenance I became obsessive about winterizing.  After running for a few minutes with new oil (for the 4-cycle engines), I would drain the tank, the carb and blow air through all the fuel lines.  As a result, the motor always started on the first or second pull in the spring.  I once had an outboard mechanic tell me that if everyone properly winterized their outboard, 80% of his business would be gone.  The problem seems to be worse with two cycle engines where the volatile stuff evaporates from the carb over the winter and leaves a goo or varnish that prevents things from working properly in the spring.  Perhaps my winterizing procedure wasn't necessary, although I did always feel pleased with myself in the spring when the motor started up smartly.

    I'm not sure about the rest of the world, but here in Canada our premium fuel does not contain ethanol.  Alcohol will eat some plastic/rubber components in older engines.  Ethanol is also hygroscopic and thus absorbs water into the fuel.  If you have the choice, it is best avoided.  

  • 10 Oct 2016 21:54
    Reply # 4299341 on 4298484
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
    David Thatcher wrote:

    I think it is pretty hard to beat the high thrust version of the Yamaha 9.9hp 4 stroke outboard. This is as fitted to Footprints, mounted in a well with remotes and electric starting.


    David,

    the Yamaha you describe, sounds like a similar version of the one I fitted to the 3-ton Johanna, back in 1999. That was the model with 25” (XL) leg and manual start. The gear lever sat next to the twist grip throttle. The gear ratio was 3:1 and the propeller was 11¾  x 9¼“ (Diam x pitch), if I remember correctly. It pushed the boat up to 6.3kts, which was the theoretical hull speed. At 5.8kts I recorded a fuel consumption of 0.50 l/NMi

    To start that 324ccm engine by one hand called for a special technique: I first pulled it over the compression top a few times, slowly, to prime it. Somehow, I could feel when it was ready, and then it was just to give it a good yank and it would start.  My “winter preservation procedure” was just to start and run it for a few minutes, 2-3 times during winter. If the temp was below zero, it could feel a little stiff and reluctant. Then I fitted a nice long extension line to the starter cord and pulled the engine over the top as many as 10 -15 times.  After this treatment it would usually start at first (2-handed) yank.

    The steering friction could be adjusted very precisely with a lever at the front. Since I used the steering actively when backing out of the berth, this was very useful. The tiller lock for my new Tohatsu for Ingeborg is not so good  -  awkward to reach and difficult to set. I think I will fit a tiller lock to hold it, instead.

    Arne

    PS: That Yamaha is still doing good service on Johanna, now with another owner. Sitting on the stern, at the centreline, it works just as well with the boat rolling or heeling.

  • 10 Oct 2016 21:24
    Reply # 4299309 on 4298083
    Deleted user

    China Girl has an 18hp Tohatsu hanging off a frame at the stern, and I wouldn't change it for an inboard. Three advantages:

    1. It encourages sailing - in any kind of sea the prop is out of the water more than it's in.

    2. If anything needs fixing, it's much more pleasant to do it sitting in the fresh air than upside down with your head in an oily bilge.

    3. For more serious problems, removal is infinitely easier.

    Chris
  • 10 Oct 2016 21:00
    Reply # 4299294 on 4298083
    Building my own boat, I get no end of free advice.  Being a woman building my own boat would appear to lead to even more of it.  Much is good, some simply a result of prejudice.  My decision to go for an outboard engine has probably led to the most negative input (most of my other choices are too far from mainstream even to be understood by many!).  My private mantra has been 'Look-at-Footprints-look-at-Shoestring', both boats equipped with outboard motors and very happy with them.  Their 9.9hp in significantly bigger, heavier boats, is surely equivalent to my choice of 6hp for SibLim. 

    I chose to go outboard largely for the simplicity, but sure, cost is a BIG factor.  My (superficial) research showed me that fitting an inboard would cost me twice the initial cost for the engine itself, and that's to say nothing of the time it would take.  The outboard I will put on the transom, connect to a fuel tank and call it installed.  Moreover, while diesel engines are inarguably reliable they require one or more holes in the hull and their ancillaries require maintenance and replacement during the life of the engine: starter motor, alternator, water pump, stuffing box, etc, etc.

    I have no doubt that I've made the correct choice, but it's really, really good to hear other people speaking so positively about their own experiences with outboard auxiliary power.

    My Nissan/Tohatsu is second-hand.  I shall report on my satisfaction or otherwise when and if I get this boat in the water!

  • 10 Oct 2016 07:19
    Reply # 4298484 on 4298083
    Deleted user

    I think it is pretty hard to beat the high thrust version of the Yamaha 9.9hp 4 stroke outboard. This is as fitted to Footprints, mounted in a well with remotes and electric starting. For all intents it works much like a diesel inboard with plenty of power as an auxillary for a vessel the size and weight of Footprints. I would now never consider fitting a diesel engine. The only possible downside is a lack of battery charging capability but that has been more than made up for by use of solar panels, wind generator, and use of non high power consumption electrics, but we are still able to run an electric fridge. Also the motor has proved over the last 8 years to be very reliable and trouble free, and has done everything we have asked of it in some sometimes difficult situations. 

    Last modified: 10 Oct 2016 07:30 | Deleted user
  • 10 Oct 2016 06:17
    Reply # 4298410 on 4298083
    Deleted user

    Motors:

    I built my boat in 1982, and have had several motors.  I used oars (first four years, 1.5 knt max in no wind for an hour; 0.5 knot for ten hours on Puget Sound, Washington State, playing the tidal currents); a 6hp Seagull (next five years, full-out it pushed boat at 6knts, smoked like crazy, drank gas/oil like a true sailor on shore leave) ; a 2.0hp Gamefisher 2 stroke (1 year, made about 2 knots with no wind); a Johnson Sailmaster 9.9hp (7 years, made 8knts full out, usually cruised at 6.5, used a medium amount of gas); a Mercury 15hp (12 years, maxed at about 7.5knt, even with wrong prop it was GREAT on gas, about 12miles per gallon, but very heavy).  I still often use the oars, but can only get about 1 knot for 10 minutes (getting older).  The 4 stroke is really too heavy for me to be quickly lifting anymore.  I am investigating electric outboards.

    Mounting:

    My boat is like a big canoe, 35' long, 8' wide with a draft (leeboards up) of 18" and 9000lbs displacement.  So, very easy to push. And, I really like traveling into shallow water where I may need to pull the motor up at a moment's notice. I have usually used the outboard in a motor well in the stern.  I have never been happy with any of my attempts to close the hole when the outboard is "up" and sailing or rowing (ideas most welcome). I once built an attachment to set the motor outside the hull near the stern,  making it easier to lift the motor when in shallow water ... but it had the problems that sheets tangled on the motor, in rough water the motor could get dunked from stern waves, and in certain windward wind/wave sailing conditions the bracket liked to scoop water over the windward side and into the cockpit.

    Future - electric outboard (?):

    After checking the numbers using Skene's Elements on motor power, I bought the very expensive Torqeedo 1004, with 1000 watts power.  I was impressed that it actually pushed my boat at what Skene's said it would - maxed at 1000 watts gave me 3.3 knots in no wind, no current, boards up, and no wave conditions.  With its self-contained battery its all-up weight is about 40 lbs ..  and runs long enough to easily get me out from and back to moorage (on the mud at low tide).  I am currently rebuilding the boat to prepare for Junk rig and am thinking that their 4.0 should push my boat at a little over 5 knots, according to Skenes.  I will always keep the oars, also useful for poling.  I expect to build a yuloh sometime soon to see how that works .

    ps - this is my first post to the forum.  Over the past year I believe I have read everything on this site at least once.  I don't have the words to express how much I appreciate everything everyone has kindly shared.  Thank you all.  When I am ready to start my rebuild I will post and share whatever I can as my small way to give back to this wonderful group. - Ron

  • 10 Oct 2016 04:06
    Reply # 4298309 on 4298083
    Deleted user

    I've had the same engine you and now David have, the Tohatsu 6hp, and think it is the best choice around for a small boat.  The starter does have the idiosyncrasies you describe, but I actually preferred it (I have a good-natured spouse and children who instinctively jumped out of the way when I went to start the engine).  Our engine had the long leg and high thrust prop, which I thought were worthwhile.  Anyone considering getting one should know that the 4, 5, and 6hp from Tohatsu (or nissan) are all the same block and the same weight.  So, other than the added expense for the 6hp, there is not much to recommend the smaller engines.  Most manufacturers have this sort of arrangement, so it is worth comparing weight and HP when deciding on an engine.

    The high thrust props on these modern outboards are just lower pitch, slightly wider diameter and a bit more blade area.  They are nothing like the improvement that could be seen with a high gear ratio like the old seagull engines that swung massive props for their hp.  Too bad no one makes an outboard designed for a displacement hull anymore.

    For mounting, I liked the arrangement our Hurley 20 had, with the outboard mounted in a small well on the stern.  An outboard that can be turned allows you to do docking and slow speed manoeuvres so easily.  I'm not a big fan of outboards mounted under the cockpit sole.  They don't seem to get enough fresh air to be happy, and often you can not lift the leg clear of the water when sailing.  I've heard it argued that this location keeps the prop in the water, but with our H20 we never had the prop come clear of the water, despite some pretty boisterous occasions.

    Four cycle is brilliant.  Our fuel usage was about half of what we managed with our two cycle engines and there was no fuel to mix.  Four-cycles do suffer from being much heavier than equivalent two cycles, but the Tohatsu 4, 5, 6hp, were about 60 lbs, which was still reasonable and didn't cause the stern of the H20 to squat.  It is worth working though the hull-speed hp calculations for your boat, and then adding a bit for wind and waves.  So many small boats seem to have larger than necessary engines strapped to their sterns.  Combined with crew in the cockpit, these large engines can make the stern squat and really seem to hurt tacking performance.

    Generally speaking, a four cycle engine is smoother than two cycle.  However, in the lower hp range many of the four cycle engines are single cylinder engines and we found the vibration just as bad as with our previous two cycle engines.

    Last modified: 10 Oct 2016 04:09 | Deleted user
  • 09 Oct 2016 22:25
    Message # 4298083
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
     

    From 2-stroke to 4-stroke outboards

    I elect to start this topic as an offspring from this Weaverbird  -  the refit topic, around 9. October, 2016. These days outboard engines have become so good  -  and the diesel engines so expensive, that many more sailors  -  and practical junkies in particular  -  will prefer the cheaper alternative.

    Before buying my first 4-stroke engine in 1985(?), I had sailed for over ten years with two-stroke engines on the sterns; a 4hp Mercury, a Seagull and a 2-cylinder, 6hp Johnson.

    The first 4-stroke engine surely proved to play in a higher league when it came to reliable starting, slow speed handling and reduced fuel consumption.  However, they needed a different technique when starting. With the 2-strokes I simply grabbed the handle and pulled fairly long and medium hard, and then the engine started, mostly. Not quite so with the 4-stroke. I soon learned the hard way that one must first pull the cord until compression is felt and then give it a fast, short yank. Failing to use this technique, I could well be ‘rewarded’ with a violent backfire, which ripped the handle out of my hand.  On all my previous  4-stroke engines; a 7.5hp Honda, a 9.9hp (324ccm) Yamaha and the little 50ccm 2.3hp Honda , I have used this starting method and got away with it.

    However, the new 6hp single-pot Tohatsu for Ingeborg surprised me: When pulling the starter cord, it felt unnaturally light. It also appeared to be long between each compression. The dealer then showed me how to start it  -  with a fast, long “2-stroke pull”. Obviously the recoil start of this motor has been given a different gearing than earlier models.

    My hunch is that some of those back-firings of earlier models have resulted in complaints from customers, so they have geared the recoil starter down.

    On my Ingeborg there is an about one metre long aft deck which makes access to the engine a bit awkward, so to get the right swing, I soon added an extension starting cord, first with a crude handle, and later with a nice plywood job (left photo). This worked well, as long as I gave it this long, fast pull. This was no problem if I was alone in the cockpit.

    Very recently I added a simple block device (right photo) to let me get a more effective and short pull while standing in the cockpit. A quick two-handed half-meter pull on my (blue) handle gives a super-quick one-meter pull on the starter cord. This makes life less dangerous for passengers sitting around.

     

    Arne

     

    PS: I hope this topic eventually will be filled up with all sorts of good advices about outboard engines.

      


    Last modified: 09 Oct 2016 22:38 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software