Jerry Barth wrote:
My plan for the rig is a biplane junk rig using unstayed carbon masts. From looking at other cats of about the same weight I came up with about 6-700 sq feet of total sail area. This boat will be in the caribbean so smaller might be better because it seems to always blow about 15 knots down there anyway. One other factor is that the longest mast I can make in my shop is about 40 feet, I might be able to splice on stubs or something to make it slightly longer. I would like to keep it on the shorter side anyway for the fixed bridges we have in the States.
Some things I was wondering about since the junk rig book is about 15 years old. What are people using for masts? How about battens and batten material? Does making camber (with lenses etc.) in the sails make enough difference to be worth it?
Thanks,
Jerry Barth
Hi Jerry,
To hoist a 350 sq ft sail, you only need about 33ft of mast above deck, so a 40ft mast should be fine.
I think that today's number one choice for a mast is a spun-tapered alloy pole, as used for streetlighting and flagpoles. There are several links in our pages. Next choice is the hybrid mast, made from an alloy tube with a wooden topmast. That is economical, and has proved to give good service. I would only attempt a carbon mast if you have a lot of previous experience of making large carbon structures.
In your size of sail, an alloy tube of 1 3/4" dia x 16SWG wall in 6061T6 would be first choice for battens.
As to camber, that's a personal choice. Some people sail in a relaxed way, and are not concerned with maximum speed to windward; they stay with a flat sail. Others are more performance orientated, and put camber in. Or you might say, as a rough guide, that the further offshore you sail the less windward performance and hence camber you need. Yes, it does make a difference, but it does take a little more time, effort and skill to make than a flat sail.