Stavanger, Monday
I guess our unstayed masts, at least our wooden masts, would be called rather heavy, even by Marchaj. The first JR mast on my 23’, 1400kg Malena was 9.7m long, around 21cm diameter, solid wood and weighed about 80kg. This was a bit too much, with the mast adding 5.7% weight to the boat. We clearly had to reef rather early because the mast made the boat tender. I first cut off one panel height (95cm) of the mast and shaved off one cm of the diameter. This was clearly an improvement. When a new mast was made, it was made hollow and just 9.4m tall. The reduced weight (about 70kg - 5% of boat) definitely helped her, but the mast is still on the heavy side - and way overstrong.
On my present boat Johanna (29’, 3ton) her 25cm hollow mast is around 90kg which adds only 3% to the displacement. From a strength point of view even this is a bit big, but Johanna seems totally happy with it. I guess wind drag is a bigger problem than weight. The mast gives the boat a nice and slow roll rate, so the boat is totally unaffected by swell from motorboats and ships. Only with the waves coming in on the quarter, the boat may roll in resonance with the waves. In all other conditions the inertia of the mast seems to be a good thing.
When I now have gone for a hybrid wood-aluminium mast for my big dinghy (21’, 750kg), it is not so much to save weight, but rather because it was a quick and simple method of making it.
If I dare suggest a rule of thumb, it must be that a mast weight up to 3% of the boat’s displacement is no problem from a static stability point of view (..on a cruiser...). The inertia of a "3% mast" mast ensures a nice and slow roll, and as Marchaj (and Kurt) points out; it also provides a barrier against being knocked down.
Cheers, Arne
PS: Racing is a different business. Then a superthin and superlight and tall mast is what one wants.