Jerry Stebbing wrote:I'm about to buy an aluminium conical pole from ALC for my Rustler 31's new mast but just wanted to seek advice on a few details before I place a firm order.
I've basically gone with similar dimensions to Tystie, ie 222mm diameter with 5mm wall thickness. According to the online junk rig calculator this has a breaking strength of 4975 kpm, and my boat (2.743 metres beam, 5250 kg disp) is shown as having a righting moment of 3200 kpm. I think Tystie is quite a bit heavier and with more sail area than my Rustler so I'm hoping I should have a decent safety margin. Any thoughts?
ALC have sent me an example drawing of a stock 5mm wall thickness lighting pole 9.2 metres overall with 222mm base dia and 90mm top dia. My pole will be 11.7 metres overall. Is 90mm a good choice for the top diameter?
The drawing of Roger Taylor's lighting column specifies 6005A T6 as the aluminium grade used, but the drawing for the 9.2 metre x 222mm x 90mm x 5mm column shows 6063 T5. I'm not sure yet whether I can specify a particular alloy for my special order pole but which would be the preferred grade if I'm offered the choice?
Jerry
Yes, you will be OK with the 222mm dia mast. The calculator in junk FAQ/masts gives a safe stress, not a breaking stress.
I cut a metre off the top of my pole, to get to a top diameter of 100mm. I think that 90mm is too small for this size of mast ( as you'd also think if you climbed to the top of it).
Unfortunately, the spin-tapering method cannot be used on the stronger alloys. I'm surprised that Roger's pole specifies T6 temper, as I've never seen anything other than 6063T5 alloy specified for these tapered poles. However, 6063T5 is fine in practice, as you are looking for stiffness as much as strength in a mast, and stiffness is not related to strength, only to modulus of elasticity, which is the same for all aluminium alloys.If you should happen to be given a choice, then 6061T6 and 6005T6 are stronger, and 6063T5 is less strong.