Jordan Series Drogues, other Drogues, and Sea Anchors

  • 17 Feb 2013 23:37
    Reply # 1210939 on 592701
    Beth Leonard and her partner on Hawk (a 47 foot Van der Stadt), who have a great deal of heavy weather experience, are currently making up a drogue with two large cones, separated by 100m of line.  They have a JSD aboard that they have used successfully in a Southern Ocean storm but have decided to experiment with this set up because of the difficulty in retrieving the JSD.  It seems to be manageable in a smaller yacht but quite daunting in larger vessels.  I used to have three large drogues that I was going to set in series but my friend got rid of them when he had the boat last year.  Gary, I think your set up will work well will work well if you make the drogue long enough (around 100 metres all up) and have a length of chain at the end to keep it deep, and if the devices you bought are strong enough.  That is the principal drawback of using fewer, larger cones.  The fewer and larger they are the greater the stresses on each one.  The drogues I had were made by Seabrake and they appeared to be very strong.  I like the multiple cones of the JSD (you can buy them if you wish as a kit or make your own or buy a complete drogue) as each cone is not under much load. 

    The other consideration is whether your drogue has enough drag potential.  The reports of vessels deploying a JSD in severe storms that I have read all state that the vessel slowed down to about 1.5 knots, which seems to be the benchmark to aim for.  You could do what Paul did when you are doing sea trials.  Go out in 35 - 40 knots (not an easy thing to force yourself to do) and test it.  If you are still going too fast you can add another cone or two.  You might also be able to test its drag potential by using your engine and/or sails in more moderate conditions.

    As for me I am still thinking.  I am a bit concerned that the bridle of a standard JSD might tangle with my outboard motor stowed on a bracket on the transom.  A few boats have had this sort of problem with their bridles.  As you come over the crest of a wave the bridle angles down steeply and could get under anything mounted on the transom.  One boat got it around the leg of their Aries wind vane with unhappy results.  If the wind stops for a while, as in the eye of a cyclone or when the wind changes direction as a trough passes, the drogue has been known to hang straight down until the boat takes up again with the new wind direction.  I'd rather set it off the starboard quarter without a bridle.  That way the drogue would be on the opposite side to the outboard bracket and lead away from it.  I would also be offering up the starboard edge of the transom to the seas rather than the flat transom, (though this does not appear to have caused any problems with other vessels.)  Mr Jordan and the US coastguard believe the bridle system is superior but I know a lot of boats that have ridden out severe weather with a drogue over the quarter, including the 19 foot Mermaid, that survived 5 typhoons in the North Pacific (see the book Kodoku by Kenichi Horie).  The vessel would yaw a little more and you would need to pay particular attention to preventing chafe, but then you need to do that anyway.  All the load is on one attachment point but it needs to be massively strong no matter how you set up your drogue.  I am thinking of welding a large stainless steel enclosed fairlead on the transom to contain the inboard end of the warp and stop it sawing back and forth.  When you retrieve the drogue you bypass this fairlead so the cones don't get snagged in it.  In all other respects, my proposed drogue will be a standard JSD set up.

  • 17 Feb 2013 22:10
    Reply # 1210888 on 1210801
    Deleted user
    Jonathan Snodgrass wrote: However, here goes.  It sounds as if what you have are sea anchors.  Sea anchors are intended to stay stationary in the water, probably deployed from the bows.
    Possibly^. One is a cone of 30in diameter, two smaller are around 20in diameter, either perforated fabric or a hole in the end. Adds up to 9.3sqft.  Trying to find the stats on this but for a 9,500lbs boat may need one or two more.

    Last modified: 18 Feb 2013 00:02 | Deleted user
  • 17 Feb 2013 21:21
    Reply # 1210845 on 1210801
    Jonathan Snodgrass wrote:Gary, Please forgive me if I try to teach granny to suck eggs.  However, here goes.  It sounds as if what you have are sea anchors.  Sea anchors are intended to stay stationary in the water, probably deployed from the bows.  The cones on the JSD are designed to move slowly through the water, deployed from the stern.  Thus the boat moves forward slowly throught the water which maintains steerage on the underwater profile of the boat and keeps it going forward under control.  At least that is as I understand it from reading the blurb.   However, my experience of the JSD consists of buying one, rigging the chain plates etc, checking that it all goes together, stowing it in a locker and saying a prayer for kind winds.  Jonathan
    I do believe that what matters here is the sum of the projected areas of all the cones.
    Some examples:
    a 12ft diameter parachute sea anchor - 113 sq ft. A sea anchor, that will almost keep a boat stationary.
    120 - 5" cones on a JSD - 16.3 sq ft. A drogue, that will slow progress to a safe speed.
    12 - 17.3" cones on a series drogue - 16.3 sq ft. A drogue.
    3 - 31.5" cones on a series drogue - 16.3 sq ft. A drogue.
    1 - 55" cone - 16.3 sq ft. A drogue.
    1 - 30" cone (quite common) - 5 sq ft. A small drogue.

    As I understand it, a number of people suggested to Mr Jordan that fewer, larger cones would act the same as his large number of 5" cones, if spread out over the same length, but he thought it safer to stay with what had been tried and tested. For myself, I'd rather make and assemble 12 cones than 120 cones.

  • 17 Feb 2013 19:57
    Reply # 1210801 on 592701
    Gary, Please forgive me if I try to teach granny to suck eggs.  However, here goes.  It sounds as if what you have are sea anchors.  Sea anchors are intended to stay stationary in the water, probably deployed from the bows.  The cones on the JSD are designed to move slowly through the water, deployed from the stern.  Thus the boat moves forward slowly throught the water which maintains steerage on the underwater profile of the boat and keeps it going forward under control.  At least that is as I understand it from reading the blurb.   However, my experience of the JSD consists of buying one, rigging the chain plates etc, checking that it all goes together, stowing it in a locker and saying a prayer for kind winds.  Jonathan
  • 17 Feb 2013 11:10
    Reply # 1210550 on 592701
    Deleted user
    So happens on our last visit to Yacht Grot (2nd hand boat parts dealer) we came away with 3 drogues for $20 (one large, two small) with a mind to build a kind of half baked JSD. 100m of line with drogues placed at 60m, 80m and  the large one at 100m.
    I thought of multiple lines w/drogues but think they'll end up twisted together in an unholly mess.
  • 17 Feb 2013 08:01
    Reply # 1210524 on 592701
    I am doing some research on the JSD at the moment as I plan to put one together soon.  I hope to head south in the Tasman later this year, if the gods allow me passage, and I still have vivid memories of being beaten to a pulp in a Tasman storm in 1974.  I am rather fascinated by David's suggestion of using two drogues, one off each quarter, with a chain joining their outer end and a floating rope between them for easy retrieval.  It is very similar to what Robin Knox Johnson used on Suhaili in the Southern Ocean (without the cones).  One added benefit is that you have two chances.  With the single drogue on a bridle, if your bridle chafes through, as happened to Roger Taylor on Ming Ming, you lose the lot.  If one of them chafes through with David's set-up, only half the cones remain in action but the entire drogue is still attached to the boat. 

    Since writing the above earlier today I have been reading the US Coastguard reports on the JDS and other data.  I think perhaps the standard JSD may be a more conservative choice, a system that has been well tested.  The length of the rode and the number of cones on it appear critical.  The attachment of the bridle to the hull is the most critical issue.  Strength is not a problem for Arion, I have a welded cleat on each quarter that you could pick the boat up with.  Chafe is my major concern.  I plan to shackle a short length of chain, covered with heavy duty hose, to each cleat, using tested gal shackles.  The outboard end of the chains will also have a shackle, probably a large stainless one (Ronstan or Wichard, no cheap Chinese rubbish).  The bridle will have soft eyes spliced in it and be cow hitched to the stainless shackles and to a soft eye on the inboard end of the rode.  I will have another line attached to the inboard end of the rode as well which will have some slack in it, both as a final back up and to assist in recovery.

    This set up sounds a bit over the top - even paranoid - but in the insane violence of a major storm (my Tasman storm was reported to be 70 - 80 knots), it is almost impossible to go on deck and check the gear, or do anything about it if you do.  I was interested to read of Paul's experiences with the JDS?  Does he, or any other member, have a comment?
    Last modified: 17 Feb 2013 10:32 | Anonymous member
  • 15 Jun 2011 00:45
    Reply # 621488 on 592701
    I had the same notion of attaching a 3/8" floating line to the end chain to pull the cones in backwards, collapsed, with less effort. I think it's worth a try.
    Further, I wondered if there could be, instead of a bridle and one series drogue, no bridle but two series drogues, each of half-length, joined at their outer ends by a chain, to which a retrieval line is attached. That should take care of the tangling danger - or increase it? : -) who knows without trying. It would be going back to what used to be done, towing a long warp in a bight, but with better drag characteristics.
  • 14 Jun 2011 20:59
    Reply # 621347 on 621282
    Robert Biegler wrote:I wonder whether it would make sense to use a drum, like an oversized bobbin for sewing thread.  Attach a long trip line to the end of the drogue, where the chain is, leave the other end on the drum.  When you want to retrieve start rolling the trip line onto the drum.  When you get to the chain and drogue, keep on rolling until the whole shebang is on board.  While you retrieve, you pull the rode backwards through the water, collapsing the cones and reducing the force.  The possible drawback is that you also have less force on the rode when you unroll to deploy the drogue, but I would hope that the drag on the rode is enough.  Make the first few metres of the bridle out of chain, so that it reliably drops into the water when you start deploying.  Mount the drum permanently on the stern, so that you don't have to mess about with it when you need the drogue.  Give it a cover, so that sunlight doesn't degrade the drogue quickly.

    Is that likely to work?

    Regards

    Robert Biegler

    Yes, it may work but it would have to be tried to know for sure. The draw back is the possibility of the tripline tangling with the drogue. The drogue does not rotate (or should not if you use braided rope as per spec) and I have not observed mine to rotate but never take anything for granted at sea.

    If I tried, I'd use floating line for the tripline for sure. Chain on the first part of the bridal? I do not know as it then raises the possibility of the bridal getting caught under the boat or between the rudder and the keel. On La Chica I have floats on the first 2M's to make sure that it cannot happen.

    But if the above considerations were borne in mind it's quite possible that the system might work. I'd try it out without the drum on a nice boisterous day with a sloppy sea or big sea running to check the system out first before committing myself.
  • 14 Jun 2011 19:40
    Reply # 621282 on 592701
    I wonder whether it would make sense to use a drum, like an oversized bobbin for sewing thread.  Attach a long trip line to the end of the drogue, where the chain is, leave the other end on the drum.  When you want to retrieve start rolling the trip line onto the drum.  When you get to the chain and drogue, keep on rolling until the whole shebang is on board.  While you retrieve, you pull the rode backwards through the water, collapsing the cones and reducing the force.  The possible drawback is that you also have less force on the rode when you unroll to deploy the drogue, but I would hope that the drag on the rode is enough.  Make the first few metres of the bridle out of chain, so that it reliably drops into the water when you start deploying.  Mount the drum permanently on the stern, so that you don't have to mess about with it when you need the drogue.  Give it a cover, so that sunlight doesn't degrade the drogue quickly.

    Is that likely to work?

    Regards

    Robert Biegler
  • 09 Jun 2011 00:35
    Reply # 616460 on 616115
    Edward Hooper wrote:
    By the way did you have a Drogue or sea anchor out when you had your two knock-downs in the South Atlantic?  Would a Jordan Series Drogue (or similar) have helped Tystie cope with the Southern Ocean?

    No, Edward, wind conditions weren't at all bad, at 30 knots. We were sailing slowly, and had no need to slow down further. The seas were the problem - they got, not fast, but very confused due to two ocean currents meeting, and to the wind having veered through a large angle. They got very pointy, and we just fell off the top of them. This was South Atlantic, rather than Southern Ocean. It's about where Bill King got rolled in Galway Blazer, not a nice piece of ocean at all.
    I do carry a single drogue, to stop me hurtling too fast down wave slopes and crashing into the trough at the bottom - the major cause of damage - but have never needed it. I do carry a parachute sea anchor, to keep me off a lee shore in extremis, but have never needed it. The Jordan lies somewhere between those two. I appreciate its benefits, just haven't got around to making one. If I did do a Southern Ocean passage, well south of 40 deg, I would.
    Last modified: 09 Jun 2011 00:37 | Anonymous member
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software