Hi Iain,
Great to see a Fortune 30 with junk rig! I admired the design in BC.
Your cockpit is constrained between the aft cabin and main companionway. A whipstaff and short tiller can give mechanical advantage, but the more of that, the less the rudder moves. Your wheel (rotary whipstaff) is exactly the same, except that it can go right around, giving big rudder deflection while keeping your arms in shape. (Light weight, many reps.) I think you'd be frustrated with a whipstaff.
What if you carried the rudder stock upwards, clear of the aft cabintop? Besides making the aft cabin inaccessible, would there be room for a tiller extending either forward or aft? Or sideways? What provision is made for an emergency tiller? What if you controlled the rudder not by its stock but by its blade, or???
I'm sketching wild here... but a few (no, many) wild sketches eventually worked on mehitabel.
I considered: a universal joint to allow a bend in the rudder stock and a tiller in a new position; a whipstaff; keeping the wheel, but no thanks; building an outboard rudder; building tandem rudders; a pair of sideways tillers, athwartships that is; and in one sketch, a big horizontal wheel...
In conclusion, mehitabel's tiller simply extends aft, and sweeps a wide clear space. But her rudder is balanced, so with 4 feet of tiller, hand force is very light. I think your rudder is keel-hung and unbalanced. In all, it seems that Huntingford's/Fortune's low-geared wheel idea, in that nice cozy cockpit, may be well-justified. But a tiller is so nice. Sketch away!
Cheers, Kurt