Karl
Thanks to the horizontal rain here, I found I would rather have another go on that Nicholson 32.
After having traced the profile of the MK XI, Bm rig and all, I compared it with the original rig. It appears to just have had the tail stretched. The rig wasn’t made bigger. As you can see, I traced the mainsail and the working jib, and it is the same as the early Mk. It appears to me that Sailboatdata.com has used the working sail area of the early models and the Main plus Genoa 1 SA on the Mk XI.
Still I had a go to try design a taller sail, and also increased B from 5.50 to 5.60m. This brought the SA up to 55sqm.
I promise you one thing: That 55sqm JR will be much more powerful than a 55sqm main plus Genoa. As you see, the mast is still not very tall, at 12.9m above the wl.
If the boat were mine, my choice between the two JR designs would depend on its use:
If I were to only potter up and down the coast during the summer season, I would choose the tallest rig. However, if I had oceans crossing ambitions, I would go for the lower one. For lightwind coastal work, I could then add a light jib, no more than 15sqm, set on a spectra stay (to a short bowsprit-cum-anchor roller). With both a halyard and a downhaul for it lead aft to the cockpit, one would stay in control.
Now I spotted you latest posting:
Yes, if you can find a suitable light batten material; that would be good. As for choice of canvas; there is no law against using thicker material in the top three panels and lighter material in the lower section.
Electric capstans are in use by several JR sailors. They burn very little energy on one hoisting. I still have the electric winch handle which I bought for a bigger boat.
Good luck.
Arne
PS: Would there be any problems with planting the mast where I have indicated?

