Multi hull junk

  • 28 Jan 2016 18:56
    Reply # 3787809 on 3781386
    Deleted user

    James, from your last posting it sounds as if your current boat needs a considerable amount of work to bring it up to a standard required for your proposed voyage. You really do need the right and safe boat for what you want to do, the key thing being SAFE. People have made successful offshore voyages in a wide range of different types and sizes of boats. So if it were me I would be querying whether it is worthwhile trying to patch up your current boat, or whether it is better get quit of that boat and look around for something more suitable in the second hand market. Size is not everything and it is better to have a well found vessel of 8 to 9 meters rather than a not suitable larger vessel. Your comments about the possible cost and length of time to build a new boat are correct, it will always take a lot longer than advertised by the designer.  It is going to take time and some money but with patience it is achievable. The ideal would be to find a smaller, already equipped boat that has been offshore in the past. Also spend time researching what people have done in the past and the types of boats they have used. And get a lot of coastal sailing and navigation experience which well help you become a better offshore sailor.

    Last modified: 28 Jan 2016 19:13 | Deleted user
  • 28 Jan 2016 18:21
    Reply # 3787757 on 3781386
    Deleted user

    I believe my ambitions and over enthusiasm ( Still 24)  may be getting the best of me.

    I guess I need help making a major decision since not only am I taking my own safety in my hands, but that also of my partner. If it was just me, I would have no issue raising sail and setting off in my current boat, even as it is currently rigged. If you experienced and seasoned voyagers out there think with a proper refit, strengthened, and practically modified, my boat will be able to tansport 2 small people, safely, from the Puget sound in Washington state to Estonia, sailing with the weather and stopping off whenever necessary, or if possible. To combat stowage issue, I will just maintain my 13 gal fresh water tank and get a hand pump operated water maker. We would have no rush, junk rig in some carnation (most likely aerojunk at this stage, or I am still very open to having a flat junk with a big drifter, and honestly split between the two), and have a drogue on board. All I would have to do to my boat at this point is remove and fill the holes of some unnecessary seacocks, remove and patch the hole where the sail drive is installed (power head long gone), cut out outboard well, install outboard or skeg rudder, install junk rig, reinforce deck hull joint (glass over the H channel on the outside, only on the inside if some one wiser then I thinks it is necessary), possibly install some reinforcement stringer along the cabin roof if you folks think it is crucial, and paint. This is way easier, and cheaper then building a boat. I just want to be safe. Is my 3200lbs iron shoal draft keel up to the perils of the ocean?  This is the Keep it Simple Stupid plan.

    If this boat is not able to be made safe for my prospective voyage, I will either obtain a 35ft mono-hull or build the Gypsy 28. I have the sinking feeling that 1000 hours is a bit of a conservative estimate for the build, and I feel like it will most likely cost significantly  more then just the price of the materials. Trying to build a boat, may actually kill my dream of getting out there and voyaging if it is too major of an undertaking. If I can get to Estonia in my current boat, and felt it was too small or I needed another boat, it would be much easier to build any size boat without having to deal with shop space rent ect there. I would also probably get more help from people because of my partners family.

    This is quite a major voyage that will take quite a bit of time with as many stops as possible or visas will permit. Ideally I would like to find some nice places that have very lax visa restrictions and where the authorities will well enough leave me alone to help minimize cost.  I have been playing with charting a course and a rough approximation of the voyage is 28,025.9 nautical miles if I head west from my starting point and go around the horn of Africa. I really would like to explore the Pacific on my way to Estonia. This would mean I would have to round Africa!!! This is sort of terrifying to me, but my plan would to be stay atleast 40 -80 miles out from land or other obstacles. Are Pirates a real concern? No sail boat is going to outrun pirates, and I am not carrying guns, nor will I. I am sure I would be a more likely target in a catamaran, and less likely to get picked on in a tiny little mono. 

    Or I can go through the panama canal, but that is not nearly as interesting to me.  There is so much stuff to check out in the Pacific. I have a ridiculous amount to learn before I set off. I would love to go the norther route and go around Russia, but I have not been able to find many books on those expeditions. A major concern would be ice, starvation, and the cold. My partner is a Russian citizen so if we marry we should be fine long as we file the appropriate papers. The middle east and Africa scare me (Is it for any reason or just from American propaganda?) The voyage is insane in the first place, so I want to try and at-least maintain some reasonable amount of safety. 94% survival rate is acceptable odds.


     

    Last modified: 28 Jan 2016 18:27 | Deleted user
  • 28 Jan 2016 00:40
    Reply # 3786028 on 3781386
    Deleted user

    Thank you for your expertise. I bought the boat because I felt it would be a good little off shore cruiser with modifications and a junk rig. I got her for a very modest price. All the other boaters in my area have repeatedly scolded me for such daft dreams, and have scared me a little of the saftey of such a small boat at sea.  Then again, I want to perpetually sail, not be perpetually tied to land like them, other wise I would build a house. It is very reassuring that you folks with actual voyaging experience don't think I have a death wish for wanting to try and go beyond the beaten path with my modest boat.  The reason I would like to be able to dry out and beach easily is so I do not have pay a boat lift to paint and do maintenance. Beaching seems more favorable to me then  only hanging out in the anchorage. Again, It is only of concern if I build a boat. I want to finish out my apprenticeship before I run away from the world again, because  being a certified cabinet maker would give me the ability to build really pretty boats in the future. I really truly appreciate all of your input.

    I ordered a set of study plans from Bernard Kohler of his P-95. This thing is sweet! It is like a giant hobby cat! I also like how there appears to be plenty of room to extend the bridge deck cabin if necessary.

    My neighbor gave me a good scare, which is what made me start considering a larger boat until I saw price tags. I guess I have to do more sailing, and I want to replace my current rudder any ways for an outboard hung rudder or a skeg rudder.  It should be easy enough. Thank you for renewing my hope in this boat. All of the surrounding sailors keep telling me it is a lost cause.

    I have decided that if I build a boat, I am going to use proven plans, as the cost is worth the peace of mind alone.

    Last modified: 28 Jan 2016 00:44 | Deleted user
  • 28 Jan 2016 00:09
    Reply # 3786017 on 3781386

    "What I don't like is how tender the rudder is."

    "Maybe you should just change the rudder?"

    Not such a crazy idea. I looked at the Columbia 26 Mk II, and she's quite similar to the NZ Raven 26 in hull form and displacement, with a high ballast ratio, but the rudder is not so good. I'd be quite happy to go offshore in a Raven (junk-rigged like Fantail, of course). Looking at the profile here, it would appear to be simple to add a skeg and a transom-hung rudder.

  • 27 Jan 2016 22:29
    Reply # 3785934 on 3783836
    Deleted user

    I know the multi-hull people seem a bit biased towards multi-hulls, but if you notice people who go multi-hull never quite seem satisfied with mono-hulls anymore and usually end up getting another multi-hull.


    I have some thoughts on this, having owned and cruised extensively on both multihulls and monohulls. I loved my Searunner 37 trimaran and I still think they are one of the best amateur buildable cruising boats ever designed for tropical and mid latitude cruising, whether coastal or offshore. My Newick Val trimaran was a different kind of boat altogether, fast and exciting to sail and with minimal accommodation for the size of boat. But still offshore capable, I purchased mine from someone who had sailed it from the US to New Zealand. On my Searunner trimaran I made a total of 11 offshore passages including a single handed passage between Australia and New Zealand. I rode out gales at sea on a parachute sea anchor, and I had a lot of fun exploring much of the western Pacific islands. I always felt safe at sea on the boat, but at 11 meters she was a good size for ocean crossing.

     But multihulls have their complications. They take up a lot more space in an anchorage and marina, they can be more complex, more time consuming, and more expensive, to engineer properly and build. The accommodation is often split between hulls which makes them not so good to live on. I also used to very much dislike having to repaint my Searunner because I was essentially painting three boats. Painting the topsides on 'Footprints' is a breeze in comparison.

    It took me a while to get used to the lower speeds of a monohulls but I have made it work for me. So when dreaming about what the next boat will be, (as we all do), I sometimes think about another multihull but realise that it is going to cost a lot of money to get something worth buying. So for me I think I will stick with monohulls. I am very fortunate to own a boat that has a lot of very workable features including a multihull sized cockpit, and shallow draft without the complication of a centerboard. The boat has enough interior space to live on board comfortably and when sailing off the wind I can even sail past much larger and very much more expensive French built cruising catamarans. I would love a monohull that goes a lot faster but that would cost a lot of money and also produce a much wetter boat as fast means more spray.


    Last modified: 27 Jan 2016 23:04 | Deleted user
  • 27 Jan 2016 20:21
    Reply # 3785634 on 3783836
    James Hleba wrote:

    Thanks for the reality check from all with experience. The thing about badger is that this Hill's sold her, and Pete went multi-hull.

    Yes, we did - but I didn't want to.  Badger was a wonderful boat and I would have kept her forever and sailed to the Pacific if it had been up to me. 

    Also, I  don't want a keel. I think it is too limiting  as far as places to check out. Maybe an internally ballasted dory with retractable centerboard?

    The centreboard would totally dominate the interior, as well as complicating the building process.

    I know for a fact that my buddy with a 24ft catamaran, kicks my boats butt every time, feels safer when heavy weather draws near. Honestly, I don't have an issue with the size of my boat as far as living goes. What I don't like is how tender the rudder is.

    Maybe you should just change the rudder?  Only kidding - if the boat truly requires a complete rebuild then it's worth considering other options.  However, I don't quite understand why your friend feels happier contemplating a gale in a 24ft cat than you do in a 26ft monohull.  It wouldn't be much fun in either, but I don't think the one is inherently more seaworthy than the other.

    Saying she is squirrelly, would be being polite. My budget dictates 30ft max regardless what type of boat. The shop space that is affordable in this region is 30ft by 30ft. Otherwise I will have to drive 2 hours to the nearest DIY yard, work out doors, and pay twice in rent what I can have a heated enclosed 30x 30 shop for.

    There are thousands of cheap boats for sale, especially smaller ones, and shoal draught is not uncommon.  Why would you spend all that time building when you can probably buy the sort of boat you need for less money?

    If I did a "Leon" style cat, I can build the the entire bridge deck into a cabin, and have a huge living area. In one pontoon I can keep the head and have a navigation center in half and some stowage, In the other hull I can set up a small shop for all my projects, and a good solid bench for my lady to use for hers.

    For a better illustration of what I am talking about, please refer to p236 in AYRS 78.  (you can download it from : http://www.ayrs.org/ayrslist.htm )

    I know the multi-hull people seem a bit biased towards multi-hulls, but if you notice people who go multi-hull never quite seem satisfied with mono-hulls anymore and usually end up getting another multi-hull.

    Not so.  I know many people who have gone from multis back to monos - and indeed was talking just a couple of days ago to a couple who built their own tri, have lived on it for years and now want to go back to a monohull.  I considered both before settling on the 26ft boat I am building now (building, because I couldn't find anything remotely like what I wanted in NZ).  A small monohull has a smaller footprint, is easier to heat and has a lot less surface area to paint and maintain.

    There are sooo many mono hulls in this area, that it would not be worth the time or effort to build one. If I build a boat, it will be a multi-hull, if not I will by something that will better suit my needs, now that I know what they are.

    I guess If I was trying to go around any horn, I might feel safer with over a ton of metal hanging beneath me.... I have to do more research into self built catamarans with above and beyond achievements.

    If I am lucky, I might get Pete and Annie to comment, as they both have different perspectives on the whole thing.

    So much to think about......

    I just don't want to start dumping obscene amounts of money into the  current boat I have for it to never be able to safely cross oceans. Since it needs total rebuild, would probably be better off putting my attention into something that will meet my goals.

    Anyone think a 1971 columbia26 mkii with 3200 lbs keel and a total displacement of 6600 lbs can be made to get me to Estonia from WA state in the USA? If so, I will just keep the boat I have.

    If Shane Acton can sail around the world in an 18 ft boat, you can sail your boat to WA.  It's more a case of whether you both want to.  But if your main aim is to cross oceans, why are you concentrating on shoal draught? .

    Thanks for listening to my nutty ideas. Everyone around here tells me to finance a 35ft erikson, but I don't really like them as the few I have sailed seemed to be designed for motor sailing, not just sailing. Again, I could be mistaken, but it is just my opinion. Also, I have no desire to re-chain myself to society through the financial bonds of debt. I am FREE and CLEAR now, and wish to stay that way for the rest of my life.

    Absolutely so, and that being the case, you need to do very, very careful costings before you think of building a boat.


  • 27 Jan 2016 20:07
    Reply # 3785606 on 3781386

    I'm by no means a multihull fan. Quite the opposite, in fact. But I've just looked through all the information on the Gypsy, and I have to grudgingly admit that it's capable of doing what you want it to do. The payload of 0.6 tonne is adequate for two people, but only just, and great care would have to be taken not to over-build and over-equip.

    But still, you are building two hulls, plus a central pod. Building a 30ft monohull should be somewhat quicker.

    I wouldn't even dream of self-designing a boat like the Gypsy. True, the hulls are a very simple shape; but designing a structurally sound catamaran is best left to skilled and experienced catamaran designers. 

  • 27 Jan 2016 07:53
    Reply # 3784534 on 3783836
    James Hleba wrote:

    My budget dictates 30ft max regardless what type of boat. The shop space that is affordable in this region is 30ft by 30ft. Otherwise I will have to drive 2 hours to the nearest DIY yard, work out doors, and pay twice in rent what I can have a heated enclosed 30x 30 shop for. 

    So, setting the centreline of the boat on the diagonal, you could build a 35ft monohull.

    Just saying...

  • 27 Jan 2016 06:26
    Reply # 3784383 on 3783836
    James Hleba wrote: 

    Anyone think a 1971 columbia26 mkii with 3200 lbs keel and a total displacement of 6600 lbs can be made to get me to Estonia from WA state in the USA? If so, I will just keep the boat I have.

    Single-handed? No problem. Two-handed? The problem will be remaining friends, and carrying enough.
  • 26 Jan 2016 23:57
    Reply # 3783836 on 3781386
    Deleted user

    Thanks for the reality check from all with experience. The thing about badger is that this Hill's sold her, and Pete went multi-hull.  Also, I  don't want a keel. I think it is too limiting  as far as places to check out. Maybe an internally ballasted dory with retractable centerboard? I know for a fact that my buddy with a 24ft catamaran, kicks my boats butt every time, feels safer when heavy weather draws near. Honestly, I don't have an issue with the size of my boat as far as living goes. What I don't like is how tender the rudder is. Saying she is squirrelly, would be being polite. My budget dictates 30ft max regardless what type of boat. The shop space that is affordable in this region is 30ft by 30ft. Otherwise I will have to drive 2 hours to the nearest DIY yard, work out doors, and pay twice in rent what I can have a heated enclosed 30x 30 shop for. 

    If I did a "Leon" style cat, I can build the the entire bridge deck into a cabin, and have a huge living area. In one pontoon I can keep the head and have a navigation center in half and some stowage, In the other hull I can set up a small shop for all my projects, and a good solid bench for my lady to use for hers.

    For a better illustration of what I am talking about, please refer to p236 in AYRS 78.  (you can download it from : http://www.ayrs.org/ayrslist.htm )

    I know the multi-hull people seem a bit biased towards multi-hulls, but if you notice people who go multi-hull never quite seem satisfied with mono-hulls anymore and usually end up getting another multi-hull.

    There are sooo many mono hulls in this area, that it would not be worth the time or effort to build one. If I build a boat, it will be a multi-hull, if not I will by something that will better suit my needs, now that I know what they are.

    I guess If I was trying to go around any horn, I might feel safer with over a ton of metal hanging beneath me.... I have to do more research into self built catamarans with above and beyond achievements.

    If I am lucky, I might get Pete and Annie to comment, as they both have different perspectives on the whole thing.

    So much to think about......

    I just don't want to start dumping obscene amounts of money into the  current boat I have for it to never be able to safely cross oceans. Since it needs total rebuild, would probably be better off putting my attention into something that will meet my goals.

    Anyone think a 1971 columbia26 mkii with 3200 lbs keel and a total displacement of 6600 lbs can be made to get me to Estonia from WA state in the USA? If so, I will just keep the boat I have.

    Thanks for listening to my nutty ideas. Everyone around here tells me to finance a 35ft erikson, but I don't really like them as the few I have sailed seemed to be designed for motor sailing, not just sailing. Again, I could be mistaken, but it is just my opinion. Also, I have no desire to re-chain myself to society through the financial bonds of debt. I am FREE and CLEAR now, and wish to stay that way for the rest of my life.

    Last modified: 27 Jan 2016 00:01 | Deleted user
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software