Galley stove/ovens

  • 30 Jul 2023 14:49
    Reply # 13234087 on 13233756
    Anonymous wrote:

    According the the advertisement the Trangia burner unit costs $36 and they claim 5 ml of spirit will heat l litre in 10-15 minutes.


    It doesn't say what volume the tank holds, but on the face of it, it does still look pretty good value for money.

    Of course, filling it or spilling the fuel anywhere near a naked flame would be dangerous (the least dangerous of all liquid or gaseous fuels, but still dangerous).

    I'd be keen to hear any other comments. How long does it run on a tank full Mauro?




    IIRC the Trangia burner can take a bit over 1 dL (100 mL): based on the website the diameter is 75 mm and height 42 mm, and you are only supposed to fill it 2/3: so 100-120 mL is probably a safe max. With safe filling you get about 20 min of flame time.

    And you are correct: attempting to refill a lit Trangia burner seldom ends well. I always lift out the burner out of the wind shield when refilling: if burning it will be to hot for my bare hand.

    Last modified: 30 Jul 2023 14:58 | Anonymous member
  • 29 Jul 2023 08:53
    Reply # 13233762 on 1195343

    Sorry 1/2 kg penne….we had to reduce the flame to avoid boiling water spoiling out of the pot..

    ciao

  • 29 Jul 2023 08:47
    Reply # 13233761 on 1195343

    Hi Graeme,

     I don’t have any time measurements. Whit the burner filled up to the halve we were able to boil water for 1kg “penne”, cook the “sugo al pomodoro” and toast “pinoli” for the salad…

    Italian style :)

    ciao

  • 29 Jul 2023 08:41
    Reply # 13233759 on 1195343

    Hi Jami, 

    thank you for the comment and advice!
    I am a beginner and I have thoughts about my Trangia experiment. Anyway the burner is quite deep and when filled up to the halve it must get a lot of tilting to let the fluid out (no cm or angles measured). Anyway I don’t intend to use it under way! I use it just while moored in a quiet situation and the pan filled with water under the basement was also intended as a DIY  safety feature…

    I’d like also to read more opinions about this…

    thanks again and cheers 

    Mauro

  • 29 Jul 2023 08:20
    Reply # 13233756 on 1195343
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Jami: I’m very happy with the Origo. It might be of poor workmanship, but then again the simplicity is a big plus.

    Thanks for the comment Jami. Simplicity is indeed a big plus and perhaps I was unfair to denigrate the quality. The stainless steel body is crude, but OK - what I really meant was, it isn't very impressive, when you consider the cost of it.

    According the the advertisement the Trangia burner unit costs $36 and they claim 5 ml of spirit will heat l litre in 10-15 minutes.


    It doesn't say what volume the tank holds, but on the face of it, it does still look pretty good value for money.

    Of course, filling it or spilling the fuel anywhere near a naked flame would be dangerous (the least dangerous of all liquid or gaseous fuels, but still dangerous).

    I'd be keen to hear any other comments. How long does it run on a tank full Mauro?



    Last modified: 29 Jul 2023 08:28 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 29 Jul 2023 07:27
    Reply # 13233752 on 1195343

    PS 2: on the web site https://trangia.se/en/ there are a lot of infos, pictures and videos…

  • 29 Jul 2023 07:26
    Reply # 13233751 on 1195343

    After seeing someone get burning ethanol spilled on at a forest camp - without the waves - I would never even imagine on taking a Trangia or something like it to a boat.

    The big difference between this and the Origo is the fact that in the latter the fuel is infused into the mineral wool and it cannot be spilled when in use.

    A Trangia burner can be modified to resemble this, but it will lose its potentially better (however small) boiling ability. 

    More danger cames with the fact that a Trangia burner is so small it has to be filled with fuel basically every time it’s being used. More risks involved.

    I’m very happy with the Origo. It might be of poor workmanship, but then again the simplicity is a big plus.

    Last modified: 29 Jul 2023 07:32 | Anonymous member
  • 29 Jul 2023 07:21
    Reply # 13233750 on 1195343

    Hi Graeme! 
    I bought the 25-1 UL/D duossal. It is the set with the steel inside. I bought also the bottle to fill the burner which I found to be a very useful thing to store safely the alcohol and pour safely the alcohol into the burner. I also bought a multifunctional plate (that we used mainly to pour the water of the noodles) and a boiler to boil water. Every piece of the stove is built simply and robust with a lot of practical details. For example there is a flame reduction tool that can be used also to extinguish the flame, in both functions it works very well. The burner has a cap with a rubber gasket that avoid pouring when the burner is stowed away. The handle to grab the hot pans is light and robust and can be put into the boiler together with the burner when stowed away. The entire set can be stowed away like a matrioska puppet, lashed together with a ribbon and takes little space. Last but not least, we love the Swedish touch of this little piece…

    As said, we use an extra 25 alu pan under the basement of the stove filled with water just in case of burning fluid pouring out the burner…of course we have a fire blanket and a fire extinguisher on board and a bucket filled with water near the galley while cooking.

    Next week we go back to the boat and I could take the stove to make some tests…also because the flame is quite yellow and this could mean that a bit of water should be mixed to the alcohol (on this I have to read better what Arne wrote about this!)…

    PS: I’ve found everything on Amazon….

    cheers Mauro 

    4 files
  • 29 Jul 2023 00:47
    Reply # 13233706 on 1195343
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Stoves. Mauro Pau: thanks for that little write-up. I too have followed these discussions.

    Having used a kerosine pressure stove (and loved it) in my early boating days – followed by many years with the more convenient LPG, I don’t think LPG can be beat, for convenience in the galley – provided the gas bottle AND ITS REGULATOR AND CUT-OFF VALVE are all mounted outside the boat. (Bottle mounted next to the stove “so it can conveniently be turned off when not in use” is a fool of an idea, as the regulator is never to be totally relied upon and this needs to be outside). I have used an electro-magnetic remote switch for many years, to shut the valve off when not in use – they are expensive and although fairly reliable I have had one failure over many years. If your battery goes flat, you can’t cook. A couple of years ago I modified a standard gas cut-off valve so that it could be mounted on the outside of the cabin with just the shaft and turning nob inside the cabin, next to the galley. I now think this is the best solution. The standard barbeque bottles are a bit heavy to lug for long distances – I have smaller bottles but they are less easy to get filled, and need to be exchanged more often. Finally – there is always that nagging thought that about once every year we read in the newspaper of yet another boat burned to the water-line, though I don’t really understand how this can happen and the actual probability of it must be very low.

    I don’t think I want to go back to pressure kerosine – the burners are expensive, and although I love that homely roar - fooling around with pre-heating them has lost its appeal, somehow.  My first commercial fishing trip was memorable in that it included a fire on board from a pressure alcohol stove. These work something along the lines of the kerosine pressure stove and burn pretty hot. This one sprung a leak somewhere and set the deckhead on fire – an interesting experience when at sea, with no life raft – fortunately the skipper was an ex-fireman, somewhat sanguine about the whole affair – elbowed me aside and carried the flaming mass in his hands out into the cockpit but then hesitated - rather than throw it overboard, decided to beat the flames out and repair the stove for future use. Coincidently the CO2 fire extinguisher was on shore at the time, at some filling station.

    So, one comes back inevitably to the idea of a stove which does not burn gas or vapour under pressure (nor fossil fuel). These Origo stoves come up for sale from time to time – by the ridiculous price they seem to command I assume they are now some sort of collector’s item. I managed to buy one a few months ago – a two burner unit which had been rarely used, in fact one of the burners seems to have never been used. I haven’t tried it yet. Frankly, to look at it, simple as it is and with no moving or gas-tight parts, I think it is a grossly over-priced piece of poorly manufactured junk (if you don’t mind me using that expression) though people who know about these things seem to like them. The burners look OK: nice and simple. The clunky ss body work is what seems to be poorly made. I wish I could dispense with it and use the burners separately. In fact, one burner is probably all I need.

    (While I am at it, I’ll touch on the subject of swinging stoves. Again, people who know about these things seem to prefer a fixed stove. Most of my stoves have been swung athwartships and I’ll go out on a limb and say this is definitely my preferred configuration, having cooked many a breakfast and brewed untold cups of coffee while lying a-hull, in rolly-polly conditions, waiting for fishing gear to soak, and never failing to marvel at how perfectly the swung stove maintains its horizontal aspect. I hope this diatribe provokes comments - I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise).

    The Trangia stove looks like an interesting solution and I am interested to know more about it. The single-burner Trangia is advertised in NZ at the moment as costing less than $150. It’s tempting to cash up my investment in the Origo, and buy one or maybe two of these. Can anyone tell me if they perform better or worse than the Origo? Anyone done a boil test (time taken to boil a litre of water) on one of these things? Being of a somewhat impatient temperament, I suppose boil time is going to be an important issue – especially with a non-pressure alcohol stove. I quite like the idea of a single burner, or two independently-mounted single burners. Does anyone know how the Trangia stoves perform, in comparison to the Origo?

    They are on special price here at the moment – is this the model you have bought Mauro?


    This is more like the price one might be expected to pay, for such a simple little device.

    Last modified: 29 Jul 2023 01:52 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 28 Jul 2023 22:07
    Reply # 13233649 on 1195343

    Hi all,

    I followed the threads about stoves and owes quite closely looking for an alternative to the origo 1500 stoves that are no more available on the market. 
    For my Kingfisher 20+ I went for a Trangia alcohol stove. They are robust and light and it is available a set whose pans have a stainless steel inside pressed into the aluminum outside (I try to avoid to cook with aluminum pans). 

    I bought anyway an extra aluminum pan. I put it under the basement of the stove and put water in it just I n case of alcohol pouring outside the burner. 

    I’ve found in my garage two old ikea L bolts that allow to fix easily the cooker to the table on the port side. The stove can easily be removed, packed together like a matrioska and stored in the shelve above the table.

    I had thoughts about this solution but it works well. Me, my wife and our two little children spent a week on our boat and the Trangia let us cook some luxury meals while moored…

    ciao Mauro 

    6 files
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software