Tystie's rig - the 2015 model

  • 17 May 2015 13:07
    Reply # 3346162 on 3302473

    David, when you say 'just the right spot' for the aft attachment of your short batten parrels, is this as shown in PJR, ie in line with the aft face of the mast, and a common parrel length based on the maximum mast girth?

    The photos seem to show this as the sail's balance increases as the mast gets narrower, but did you just use the same parrel length on all battens and just let the sail find its own natural position, or are they different lengths for each batten?

    The batten downhauls look from the photos to be attached at the same point as the aft parrel attachment, but the photo resolution isn't quite enough to be certain. Is this correct?

  • 17 May 2015 06:09
    Reply # 3346062 on 3302473

    Bonjour David

    In which area you plan to be in NZ?

    We'll land the NE of the NZ at the end of next November and we'll be verry happy to meet you again and to talk about wingsails.

    Have a good Pacific crossing.

    Bertrand

  • 12 May 2015 20:44
    Reply # 3341029 on 3302473

    Bonjour Bertrand,

    I think this rig is now fit to sail down the Pacific, and if all goes well, and Neptune smiles on me, I will be in New Zealand towards the end of the year. With luck, we will be able to meet in New Zealand and talk about wing sail battens!

  • 11 May 2015 14:32
    Reply # 3339067 on 3338389
    Dav
     
    id Tyler wrote:.......My guess is that I'd get about 90% of the wingsail's performance to windward and that I'd have to spend another 50% in manufacturing time, money, labour and assembly effort in making and rigging a wingsail to get that last 10% of performance. And as I get older, I hanker less and less after that last 10%.
    Hi David

    I understand, after to have broken all my wishbones I've chosen the cheapest and quickest way to continue to sail without to change my sails and it works well.

    I suppose you have been very disappointed after to have broken your carbon wishbones. I admire your perseverance and courage to have study and build so many rigs and sails.

    Perhaps next year when I'll be in NZ I'll build new wishbones.

    Bertrand


  • 10 May 2015 23:45
    Reply # 3338505 on 3302473

    I forgot to say in my last post that the downwind leg from Silva Bay to Blubber Bay, Texada, was in a strengthening wind that needed four reefs by the end. I was just easing the halyard and taking in the downhaul and the sheets. No problem. No difficulty in lowering the sail, no breakages.

    But there was a little problem when gybing with four reefs. I think what happens is this:

    Suppose you're on starboard tack; the hinges are articulated out to port. Then you decide to gybe. If it's windy and you're deep-reefed, the after ends of the reefed battens tend to lift up high during the gybe. Because the sailcloth is slack, the hinge wants to drop under its own weight, and this causes the batten to rotate on its axis, to allow this to happen (this is because there is no vertical articulation in these lower battens). So the starboard side of the batten is now on top. Then, after the gybe is completed onto port tack, the wind in the sail pushes the hinge, which is still hanging low, to starboard. This completes the rotation of the batten through 180 degrees, into a stable, inverted state. It doesn't cause breakages, unlike the with the wing sail battens, and it will correct itself when the reefs are shaken out.

    What's the solution? Ideally, the vertical angle should equal the horizontal angle. Then there is no tendency to seek any rotated position. Not more, or you get the problem I had last year, where the wingsail battens were stable in an 'on-edge' position. Not much less, and certainly not zero, or the battens can be stable in an upside down position. 

  • 10 May 2015 21:29
    Reply # 3338389 on 3302473

    I'm now in Port McNeill, having motored through the Desolation Sound and Yaculta/Dent/Greene Pt/Whirlpool Rapids area in calm sunny weather, and along Johnston Strait in a light headwind, so there's not much further to report on sailing performance. 

    The way I don't need a THP or LHP, and only need to tension the YHP with 2 or more reefs, is nothing short of uncanny. The short Dyneema batten parrels, with their after ends attached to the battens at just the right spot, combined with the yard being at a low angle, so that the halyard/mast angle is a little large at 35 degrees, are what make this possible. This makes for a little extra friction when hoisting the last panel, but I'm prepared to live with this because life is so very much easier when I'm reefing and shaking out reefs. 

    I don't find that the leech telltales are telling me anything. The flat-cut sail is harder to trim than either the cambered panel fantail sail or last year's short-lived wingsail, which would lift on the weather side, aft of the mast, when I pinched too high. Of course, flat-cut junk sails have always been hard to trim, and a speed indicator of some kind is probably the best way. I would very much like to put in a little bit of camber forward of the hinge, which would both add power and make the sail easier to "read", but I don't know when I'll be able to do this. Where I'd gain most would be in better acceleration after tacking, rather than actual speed to windward, I think. My guess is that I'd get about 90% of the wingsail's performance to windward and that I'd have to spend another 50% in manufacturing time, money, labour and assembly effort in making and rigging a wingsail to get that last 10% of performance. And as I get older, I hanker less and less after that last 10%.

  • 08 May 2015 21:23
    Reply # 3337063 on 3302473
    Deleted user

    Yes, but where to put the mast......  Each of the rigs would prefer a different position, and I have omitted the Split Junk Rig from the list as this is the one sail that David has yet to fit on his boat.

    If David hadn't sailed into my corner of the world I could have built a cambered panel junk and just been happy about it.  However, the wingsail is irresistible in so many ways (ignoring cost, time and keeping it from breaking).

  • 08 May 2015 17:19
    Reply # 3336775 on 3302473
    Deleted user

    Pity the poor Armchair JR wannabe.

    Been sailing with triangular sails for 40+ years and thinking, "There's gotta be a better way".

    If Blondie can sail across the the Atlantic with a JR, that is the future for me!

    But wait, flat sails ignore all we have learned about camber and air flow.  Thanks to Arne, the hard work in lofting cambered JR sails is all done for me!

    But wait, a wing sail is obviously the way to go. Beneteau will get there eventually but I have David right here having worked out all the bugs!

    But wait, David has figured out how to integrate a hinged batten that actually works and I can have the simplicity of the JR with much of the performance of the wing!

    Talk about drowning in options!

    Seriously, I feel fortunate to have stumbled upon the secret base for the Manhattan Project of JR research. 

    I will proceed with buying a boat and installing an alloy mast.  Rig TBD

    Thanks for all the wisdom freely shared

    Dennis


  • 08 May 2015 09:11
    Reply # 3336359 on 3302473
    Deleted user

    Yes Arne, I think we were talking across purposes, which was not helped by my misusing the word stall in my last post.  I see your point about the leach telltales being useful for detecting oversheeting, but in my original post I was trying to describe the differences in the sails as one as trying to sail as close to the wind as possible.  In this regard, with a traditional sail it is easier to detect when you have pinched too far and the sail begins to luff.  Given my limited experience, this transition seems to be more abrupt with a traditional or cambered panel sail and is easier to detect because the single layer of sailcloth luffs, which is easy to see, and the boat shows a distinct transition as it loses drive.  However, as you pinch with a wingsail the loss of lift or drive seemed more gradual and the two layers of sailcloth obscure any luffing of the leeside cloth.  As you said, leach telltales aren't much help in this case (but are still useful in detecting stall or over sheeting).

    Mark, I think the fact that the wingsail is happier over a wider range of angle of attack (AoA) also changes the behaviour of the sail in a way that gives it a different feel.  The wingsail produces useful lift over a wider range of AoA, which is good to keep the boat moving in variable wind and waves, but also makes detecting when you've got it sheeted perfectly more difficult ascertain (happily it probably also makes it less important to sheet it perfectly).  Even in conditions of steady wind and little waves the wingsail should have a better lift to drag ratio.

    Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack the thread into a wingsail discussion.  My main point was that the new hinged sail is powerful and seems to be working well.  The cambered panel fantail sail was also good.  All three sails work and have some interesting differences.

    Last modified: 08 May 2015 15:47 | Deleted user
  • 06 May 2015 13:22
    Reply # 3329559 on 3302473

    My understanding is that the benefit of a wing sail is ability to work over a large variation of angles of incidence.  So in a flat sea it has little benefit over a single sided sail.  When sailing into a sea the boat pitches, changing the apparent wind speed, therefore angle of incidence - this is where the wing sail wins.

    If I recall, with leech tell-tales, the sail is oversheeted until they flutter, then let out until they fly.  So by starting stalled and going to a optimum angle you should not be luffing. (which is the opposite way around to using luff tell-tales) 

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software