mehitabel's motor system

  • 10 Dec 2012 17:52
    Reply # 1156375 on 1152590
    Hi David of Footprints,

    I seriously considered building two wells for outboards into mehitabel's vast under-cockpit space. I would have put a 9.9HP 4-stroke motor in one well, and reserved the other well for sometime when we might need more speed or punch.

    The approach you've taken has definite advantages, and as Gary King says, the economics are good.

    We might resurrect the well idea, and put one into mehitabel yet, if we decide to go through Panama, or other canals, or somewhere difficult. Buying, using and selling an outboard once in a while shouldn't be too much trouble, if we do.

    Cheers,
    Kurt

  • 10 Dec 2012 14:08
    Reply # 1156219 on 1155656
    Deleted user
    John Cornicelli wrote:

    We are halfway through an electric conversion also, ..
    Wind turbine on top of the foremast, best place for it!
  • 10 Dec 2012 10:07
    Reply # 1156164 on 1152590
    Deleted user
    I reckon your maths is faultless, Annie, just the unit is wrong?

    The way I read it was 30 nm per 12L at 4 knots = 2.5nm per litre at 4 knots

    But what do I know, my 'baby' burns between 1.8 to 3L per hour depending on prevailing conditions! Interestingly, he drinks 20L an hour which came as something of a shock when in a sleep deprived state of stupidity I rigged a jerrycan in the cockpit to bypass the dirty tanks - and completely forgot to send the return line into the day tank!

    ;o)

    ps At 30p a litre btw

    :oP
  • 10 Dec 2012 08:48
    Reply # 1155995 on 1155928
    avid Thatcher wrote:

    If there is no wind and I have to motor all day I have gotten about 30 nautical miles out of a 12 litre tank of fuel motoring at a bit over 4 knots.


    David, I have never pretended to mathematical competence, but my simple mind says that 30 divided by 12 equals 2.5 knots.  What have I missed?

    Du reste  I agree with everything you say.  If my Bukh 10 were to die, the only thing that would stop me going for the outboard option is the plethora of perfectly good Bukh 10s that have been ditched by owners who wanted more power.

  • 10 Dec 2012 07:28
    Reply # 1155974 on 1152590
    Hi John,

    Fun isn't it? Any smoke yet? I'd be glad to see your boat's propulsion numbers. 

    If you post the data here, some others will probably be interested too. Have you wrestled with how much compromise you'll accept, relative to a large-tank diesel?

    I've always admired the Gazelle. They have a real scenic charm to them.

    Best of luck,
    Kurt

    -----------------
    Hi Bertrand,

    Your system seems like the best of all worlds, and powerful. Beyond our means, for sure. 

    It's great that you can retain the working characteristics of a diesel system, but still lie at anchor and soak up fuel into the batteries. And are those 4 x 240W solar panels you have? Oh yeah, a 46' cat... I guess there's room. 

    Cheers,
    Kurt
  • 10 Dec 2012 05:57
    Reply # 1155928 on 1152590
    Deleted user

    Fuel consumption depends a lot on how clean the hull is and wind and sea conditions. But I have been surprised how long a 12 litre tank of petrol goes for. If there is no wind and I have to motor all day I have gotten about 30 nautical miles out of a 12 litre tank of fuel motoring at a bit over 4 knots. I think the main disadvantage of petrol over diesel might be fuel range on a long ocean passage if you need to do a lot of motoring. When we do an extended coastal cruise of a week or more I carry 2 of the 12 litre Yamaha tote tanks and a 20 litre jerry can. I have always had a surplus of fuel.

    I suspect that the Badger style boat might be a bit more easily driven than Footprints because you do not have the extended topsides for the fill length of the boat. I am about to do a 100 mile passage to the Bay of Islands later this week so will take a careful note of how much fuel I use, although hopefully I will be doing a lot of sailing.

    What are the downsides of an outboard for an auxillary motor? 1/ Possible lack of fuel range compared with a diesel but that depends on the size of motor. 2/ combustability and explosion potential of the fuel although on Footprints the fuel sits in the outboard well compartment and is self draining. 3/ Possible cavitation in rough sea conditions if the motor is too far aft. 4/ Lack of battery charging capability compared to a diesel but then you can tailor your electrical consumption and fit out to that, and fit more solar panels. 5/ Possible drag while sailing caused by the open aperture of the outboard well. On Footprints I have found it best to have a flap closing off the well when the boat is sailing.

    What are the advantages of an outboard? 1/ Significantly lower purchase and installation cost but you need to factor in the construction of the outboard well. 2/Light weight, the Yamaha 9.9hp high thrust motor weighs only 50kg. 3/Ease, and lack of required maintenance. 4/ No motor, fuel tankage to take up interior space and no smell of diesel in the interior of the boat. 3/ 3 x less hull piercings - shaft, exhaust, and cooling water intake. 4/ Usually significantly quieter in operation than a diesel motor. 5/ Easier and lower cost upgrade/replacement in future should that be required.

    I think that another point worth noting, and I do not work for Yamaha, is the Yamaha high thrust 4 stroke outboards are the only outboards that can provide a true diesel replacement option for a displacement vessel. None of the other outboard manufacturers offer a motor which has the low ratio gearbox combined with a high thrust propellor. Also on Footprints the motor has remotes and electric start so once I have used the winch to raise or lower the motor the operation is the same as for a diesel motor.

  • 10 Dec 2012 03:16
    Reply # 1155867 on 1154630
    Deleted user
    David Thatcher wrote:

    On the subject of motors Footprints is also a little different for a boat of her size in that she has a 9.9hp high thrust Yamaha 4 stroke outboard in a well...

    I too weighed all the options, electric, diesel, outboard. (Smaller boat, below 35' does have an outboard option - little harder for 40')
    I figured an outboard in a well gives most range for the buck.

    So David, do you know the fuel consumption/range for your Yamaha setup?
    Last modified: 10 Dec 2012 03:17 | Deleted user
  • 09 Dec 2012 20:07
    Reply # 1155682 on 1152590
    Hello Kurt

    Congratulation for your DIY electric propulsion sytem.

    On my Tiki46 catamaran with Hybrid Marine I put a parallel propulsion system in each hull : a diesel Beta25 which is coupled just after the gear box with a 10KW 48Velectric motor and one battery bank of 10kwh in each hull and 4 solar panels of 240W.
    This afternoon we have had a short sailing test (with not enough wind) and I enjoyed to go away from the marina and to come back only with the electric motors (and it's easier to maneuver than to use the 2 diesels).
    The Tiki46 Apatiki of our Belgium friends has a serial electric system with and electric pod under each hull and a diesel generator + battery banks .
    Now the choice of different propulsion electric systems increase year after year, more and more sail boats will have a series or parallel propulsion system.

    Bertrand
  • 09 Dec 2012 18:38
    Reply # 1155656 on 1152590
    Deleted user
    Greetings, Kurt,

    We are halfway through an electric conversion also, and it is a nice surprise to see someone in our own association that did the same.  For a while it looked like we were the only nuts out there doing it.  Seems you found the same as we did I see, a lot of experience out there on the web and in clubs with electric car conversions, but boat conversion knowledge limited but growing.  

    Since we had to start from scratch, I would like to ask if we can bounce our numbers off you.  Looks like we have similar size boats.

    Cheers

    John
  • 07 Dec 2012 21:01
    Reply # 1154698 on 1154641
    Deleted user
    Kurt Jon Ulmer wrote:
    For the next year, we'll be here in NZ and in the trade~blessed Pacific Islands. Then hopefully on our way to distant problematical spots. Until we get there, I think we're fine. But with compromises.

    Indeed. Making choices for where you are now with an eye for making where you will go later possible is my speed!

    For example, I've got plans for a good heating system on Flutterby. And I am making do with a portable propane heater and electric space heaters until I go someplace cold enough to need it.
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software