That's great Jan - a comparison of the two stoves by someone who owns and uses both.
Not looking for "hair-splitting" comparisons - just that there is such a massive difference in price, it was natural to wonder if there was much difference in performance.
(Come on Jan - surely you are not suggesting that efficiency is "un-junklike" ? These days? Very junklike, if you ask me. Anyway, both stoves are evidently very simple to operate and I am sure we all agree that is very junklike.)
I don't think anyone came up with the idea to try filling a liquid fuel stove while it is alight - that was really just part of a general comment that even ethanol needs to be treated with respect.
Actually, I did not know the stove comprised a simple open bowl of liquid which would spill if tipped over. Perhaps the clunky Origo with its big flat body footprint is much the safer option. Still, if one is careful I am sure the Trangia has its place, as you say. Mauro seems to have a clever way of clamping the stove to make it secure when in use, and easily removable for filling when not in use. It would be small enough too, to fit comfortably into a swung housing, which would be my preferred type of installation.
By the way - thanks for the more realistic performance figures Arne - the figures quoted by the agent here amount to false advertising. It's got me curious now - I've decided to buy one and see for myself how the two compare.
I want to be "chilled out" Jan, but sometimes I get impatient, like when I want a quick cup of coffee, "chilled" just isn't the word for it - I want hot! hot! now!