Anonymous wrote:
Conclusion:
Until the opposite has been proven, I claim that the Johanna-style version of the HM-rig, sewn with camber in all the panels, assembled in the barrel-only fashion and using Amateur Method B, will be as fast as any other JR with 3D panels formed by broad-seam, shelf foot or tucks, and with the same mast height, (though it may not look as nice). Moreover, I claim that it will be so at any state of reefing. I may well be proven wrong on this, but I no longer buy armchair claims.
Stavanger, 31th July 2018,
Arne Kverneland
That would be a valid and justifiable claim, I think. Would you agree, Arne?
Haha, in your dreams, David ;-) ! I have already moderated that write-up sufficiently in that PS, yesterday.
However, just as I defend my right to do things my way, I’ll defend anyone’s right to do things theirs. One may even express differing opinions about other people’s rigs and their work, but it depends how it is being done.
What I wonder about is how ‘right on’ your criticisms are. You, (..or even I, mostly...) may call it straight talk, but sometimes, from the outside, these criticisms or feedbacks neither look nice nor encouraging.
This is my point, and firm opinion:
All criticisms (i.e. expression of differing opinions) on this site should be encouraging, even when we need to air disagreement.
The ‘straight talk’ version of criticism can easily be interpreted as patronising.
And frankly, David, your straight talk is sometimes too straight, even to me.
Cheers, Arne